Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T00:59:06.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bloodhound Missile Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. G. Biggs and
A. R. Cawthorne
A. G. Biggs
Affiliation:
Weapons Research Establishment, Australia
A. R. Cawthorne
Affiliation:
Weapons Research Establishment, Australia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The main objectives of Missile Evaluation Trials are a complete evaluation of the operational performance of the missile tested, a comprehensive assessment of the practical implications of regular operation of the weapon system from the user's point of view, and the feedback of scientific information to assist in future designs. This means that the trials must be planned to provide data on the following aspects: —

  • (a) Scientific evaluation, i.e. determination of performance in the various conditions which will arise in operational use.

  • (b) Technical evaluation, i.e. assessment of the detail design, workmanship, engineering and reliability and its influence on operational performance.

  • (c) User evaluation, i.e. a practical critical examination of (and evolution of) handling and servicing procedures, personnel training requirements, installation requirements, logistics, and the numerous organisational steps necessary for the introduction of a new weapon into service.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 66 , Issue 621 , September 1962, pp. 571 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Lawrence, T. F. C., Hayman, E. G. and Benyon, P. R. Use of a Mathematical Model in the Evaluation of Guided Missile Performance. Jour. I.E. Aust., September 1961.Google Scholar
2.Siefert, W. W. The Role of Computing Machines in the Analysis of Complex Systems. Joumees Internationale de Calcul Analogique, September-October 1955.Google Scholar
3.Keats, R. G. The Evaluation of Complex Systems using Analogue Computers. Third International Conference on Analogue Computing (to be published).Google Scholar
4.Lonergan, J. P. The Australian Guided Weapons Analogue Computer. RAE Technical Note GW319, June 1954.Google Scholar
5.Spearman, F. R. J., Gait, J. J., Hemingway, A. V. and Hynes, R. W. TRIDAC, a Large Analogue Computing Machine. Proceedings of the I.E.E. May 1956.Google Scholar
6.Biggs, A. G. Validation of Mathematical Models using Analogue Computers. Third International Conference on Analogue Computing ﹛to be published).Google Scholar
7.Benyon, P. R. Computing Equipment for the Simulation of Surface-to-Air Guided Missiles. WRE Report SAD31. April 1961.Google Scholar
8.Benyon, P. R. The Australian Guided Weapons Analogue Computer (AGWAC). Third International Conference on Analogue Computing (to be published).Google Scholar
9.Benyon, P. R. The Design of a Drift Corrected Variable Mark-Space Ratio Multiplier. WRE Report SAD18. June 1959.Google Scholar
10.Dunne, L. J. Digital to Analogue Converters used with the Australian Guided Weapons Analogue Computer (AGWAC)' Third International Conference on Analogue Computing (to be published).Google Scholar
11.Best, D. Some Problems of Polar Missile Control. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, August 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar