Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:52:50.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Galerkin solution for clamped skew plates in bending

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Madhujit Mukhopadhyay
Madhujit Mukhopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Department of Naval Architecture, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous attempts to analyse clamped skew plates by Galerkin's variational procedure have resulted in discrepancy occurring for rhombic plates. Iyenger and Srinivasan employed along both of the skew axis of the plates the characteristic displacement functions for the normal modes of vibration of a clamped-clamped beam. Their results compared well with those of other investigators but not with Kennedy which differed significantly from the others for rhombic plates.

Information

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 82 , Issue 813 , September 1978, pp. 396 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Iyengar, K. T. S. and Srinivasan, R. S. Clamped skew plate under uniform normal loading. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 71, pp 139–140, 1967.Google Scholar
2. Kennedy, J. B. On the bending of clamped skew plates under uniform pressure. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 69, pp 352–355, 1965.Google Scholar
3. Kennedy, J. B. Discussion of Reference 1. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 72, pp 338–339, 1968.Google Scholar
4. Iyengar, K. T. S. and Srinivasan, R. S. Authors’ reply to J. B. Kennedy's discussion on their paper. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 72, pp 340, 1968.Google Scholar