No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
The subject of tail buffeting first came into prominence in this country early in 1931 when the Accidents Investigation Sub-Committee of the Aeronautical Research Committee issued their report on the accident to a Junkers monoplane at Meopham, Kent. The Sub-Committee gave it as their opinion that tail buffeting was the probable primary cause of this accident, and recommended that the phenomenon should be investigated. At this time tail buffeting (Leitwerkschutteln) was quite well known in Germany, where the low-wing monoplane, which is peculiarly susceptible to this trouble, was a popular type of aircraft; and some full-scale experiments on the subject had already been made by the Deutsche Versuchsanstalt fiir Luftfahrt. The findings of the Accidents Investigation Sub-Committee caused an intensive study of buffeting to be undertaken both in Germany and in this country, and the enquiry was also taken up in the United States at a later date. As a result of these studies tail buffeting is now quite well understood, and methods for its avoidance have been established.
Information
- Type
- Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1934
References
List of References
1. “Technical Report by the Accidents Investigation Sub-Committee oil the Accident to the Aeroplane G-AAZK at Meopham, Kent, on 21st July, 1930.” R. & M. 1360.Google Scholar
2. “Die deutsche Untersuchung des Unfalls bei Meopham (England).” Blenk, H., Hertel, H., and Thalau, K.. D.V.L. Report No. 267. Also Z.F.M., Vol. 23 (1932), No. 3, pp. 73-86; No. 7, p. 199.Google Scholar
3. “A German View of Buffeting.” Blenk, H.. “Aircraft Engineering,” May, 1933, p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. “Relazione Finale della Commissione d'Inchiesta sull'Incidente dell'Apparecchio S.64.” Supplement to “Revista Aeronautica,” August, 1931.Google Scholar
5. “Two Reports on Tail Buffeting.” R. & M. No. 1457. The reports included are: “ Experiments on the Buffeting of the Tail of a Model of a Low-wing Monoplane.” By Frazer, R. A., Duncan, W. J., and Falkner, V. M.; and “First Report on the General Investigation of Tail Buffeting.” By Duncan, W. J., Ellis, D. L., and Scruton, C..Google Scholar
6. “Second Report on the General Investigation of Tail Buffeting.” R. & M. 1541. By Duncan, W. J., Ellis, D. L., and Smyth, E..Google Scholar
7. “The Behaviour of Fluids in Turbulent Motion.” Fage, A.. Journ. Roy. Aero. Soc., July, 1933.Google Scholar
8. “On the Flow of Air behind an Inclined Flat Plate of Infinite Span.” Fage, A. and Johansen, F. C.. Proc. Roy. Soc. A., Vol. 116, 1927. Also R. & M. 1104.Google Scholar
9. “The Structure of Vortex Sheets.” Fage, A. and Johansen, F. C.. Phil. Mag., February, 1928. Also R. & M. 1143.Google Scholar
10. “The Measurement of Fluctuations of Air Speed by the Hot-Wire Anemometer.” Dryden, H. L. and Kuethe, A. M.. N.A.C.A. Report No. 320.Google Scholar
11. “The Generation of Vortices in Fluids of Small Viscosity.” Prandtl, L.. Journ. Roy. Aero. Soc., August, 1927.Google Scholar
12. “Some Aspects of the Mutual Interference between Parts of Aircraft.” R. & M. No. 1480. Ower, E..Google Scholar
15. “Versuche zur Beseitigung von Leitwerkschütteln.” By Biechteler, C.. Z.F.M., 24th January, 1933.Google Scholar
16. “Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Research on Tail Buffeting and Wing-Fuselage Interference of a Low-Wing Monoplane.” N.A.C.A. Technical Note No. 460. By Hood, M. J. and White, J. A.. A slightly abridged version appears in “Aircraft Engineering” for September, 1933, under the title “An American Cure for Buffeting.”Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by