Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:50:16.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aircraft program motion along a predetermined trajectory Part 1. Mathematical modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W. Blajer and
J. Parczewski
W. Blajer
Affiliation:
Department of MechanicsTechnical University of RadomPoland
J. Parczewski
Affiliation:
Department of MechanicsTechnical University of RadomPoland
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A mathematical model is presented of the aircraft program flight along a predetermined trajectory, with or without a specified speed history. Moreover, the aircraft is constrained to coordinated turns, which implies zero value of sideslip angle. The final equations of program motion are derived as a set of differential/algebraic equations. The aircraft control input ensuring the exact realisation of program constraints results from the transient dynamic solution of the equations of program motion. A simple numerical illustration is included.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 94 , Issue 931 , January 1990, pp. 17 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Walker, R. A., Gupta, N. K., Duke, E. L. and Paterson, B. Developments in flight test trajectory control, AIAA 22nd Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-84-0240, 9-12 January, 1984.Google Scholar
2. Duke, E. L. and Jones, F. P. Computer control for automated flight test maneuvering, J Aircr, Oct. 1984, 21, pp 776–782.Google Scholar
3. Blajer, W. Modelling of aircraft program motion with application to circular loop simulation, Aeronaut J, Aug.-Sept. 1988, 92, (917), pp 289–296.Google Scholar
4. Blajer, W. Modelling of control of system with program constrains, Adv Model Simul, 1988, 12, (3), pp 53–63.Google Scholar
5. Blajer, W., Maryniak, J. and Parczewski, J. On the mathematical modelling of program motions of flying objects, Proceedings of the 8th Yugoslav Congress of Aerospace Sciences, Mostar, 9-12 June, 1987. Vol. 2, pp 101–106.Google Scholar
6. Blajer, W. Determination of the airplane control model ensuring the exact realisation of program motion, Theor Appl Mech, 1987, 25, (3), pp 439–447.Google Scholar
7. Wittenburg, J. Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, Taubner, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar
8. Etkin, B. Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight, John Wiley and Sons, New York — London — Sydney — Toronto, 1972.Google Scholar
9. Thomas, H. H. B. M. Some thoughts on mechanical models for flight dynamics, Aeronaut J, May 1984, 88, (875), pp 169–184.Google Scholar
10. Hemami, H. and Weimer, F. C. Modelling of nonholonomic dynamic systems with applications, J Appl Mech, Mar. 1981, 48, pp 177–182.Google Scholar
11. Kane, T. R. Dynamics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
12. Nikravesh, P. E. Some methods for dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems: a survey, NATO ASI Series, F9, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1984, pp 351–368.Google Scholar
13. Amirouche, F. M. L. and Jia, T. Automatic elimination of the undetermined multipliersin kane's equations using a pseudo uptriangular decomposition (PUTD) method, Comput Struct, 1987, 27 (2), pp 203–210.Google Scholar
14. Kamman, J. W. and Huston, R. L. Dynamics of constrained multibody systems, J Appl Mech, Dec. 1984, 51, pp 899–903.Google Scholar
15. Blajer, W. Aircraft program motion along a predetermined trajectory, II. Numerical simulation with application of spline functions for trajectory definitions, Aeronaut J, Feb. 1990, 94, (932).Google Scholar
16. Nikravesh, P. E., Wehage, R. A. and Known, O. K. Euler parameters in computational kinematics and dynamics, I. J Mech Trans Autom Des, 1985, 107, pp 358–365.Google Scholar
17. Korn, G. A. and Korn, T. M. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York — San Francisco — Toronto — London — Sydney, 1968.Google Scholar