Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T00:33:42.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural evaluations of simulators: academic and practical issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. B. Stammers
R. B. Stammers*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Psychology, The University of Aston in Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question posed by the symposium title is one of concern to many psychologists, especially those with interests in the study of high levels of human skill. The area of flight simulation does however present a number of challenges in terms of research questions, which are at present only partially answered.

There are at least three areas of simulator use where psychologists have interests and have a part to play:

  • Man-machine system development

  • Research simulators

  • Training simulators.

Information

Type
SYMPOSIUM ON “Is Flight simulation of academic interest?”
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 84 , Issue 835 , August 1980 , pp. 227 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Adams, J. On the evaluation of training devices. Human Factors, 21, pp 711–720, 1979.Google Scholar
2. Crawford, A. M. and Crawford, K. S. Simulation of operational equipment with a computer-based instructional system: a low-cost training technology. Human Factors, 20, pp 215–224, 1978.Google Scholar
3. Prather, D. C. Prompted mental practice as a flight simulator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, pp 353–355, 1973.Google Scholar
4. Rolfe, J. M., Hammerton-Fraser, A. M., Poulter, R. F., and Smith, E. M. B. Pilot response in flight and simulated flight. Ergonomics, 13, pp 761–768, 1970.Google Scholar
5. Simon, C. W. Economical multifactor designs for human factors engineering experiments. Hughes Aircraft Co, Rept No HAC-P73-326A (AD-A035108), Culver City, California, 1973.Google Scholar
6. Trollip, S. R. The evaluation of a complex computer-based flight procedures trainer. Human Factors, 21, pp 47–54, 1979.Google Scholar