Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T04:53:05.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computers and wind tunnels: complementary aids to aircraft design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. B. Haines
A. B. Haines*
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association Ltd
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This Second European Pioneers Day Lecture has two main themes: to pay tribute to the memory of Professor Dietrich Küchemann and second, to comment on how computers and wind tunnels should be used to assist aircraft design. These are not separate themes; as I will show, they are closely interrelated. You may be surprised that I feel that a lecture on the second theme is needed. However, in the past ten years, there has been a dramatic advance in theoretical methods on aerodynamics and in particular, for transonic flow calculations. This has created new opportunities but if we are not alert, there are also dangers in the new situation. My aim in this lecture is to draw attention to the opportunities and the dangers. I want to express my belief that computers will never completely replace the wind tunnel; we must learn to use them in partnership; only in this way can we hope to compensate for the limitations of any theory or the deficiencies of any experiment and finally, we must never forget that both are only tools; they are not a substitute for the human brain. Ideas, concepts, inventive genius, intuition, experience, the ability to interpret and draw logical conclusions will always be needed: in short, without scientists such as Professor Küchemann, the computers and the wind tunnels will be of little value.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 81 , Issue 799 , July 1977, pp. 306 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Peake, D. J. and Rainbird, W. J. Technical evaluation report on the Fluid Dynamics Symposium on flow separation. AGARD-AR-98. October 1976.Google Scholar
2. Küchemann, D. Aerodynamic design. The Fourth Reynolds-Prandtl Lecture, The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society. February 1969.Google Scholar
3.Flow separation. AGARD CP-168. May 1975.Google Scholar
4. Küchemann, D. Some developments in aerofoil theory. Eleventh Ludwig Prandtl Memorial Lecture, Zurich. RAE TR 67051. 1967.Google Scholar
5. Küchemann, D. and Weber, J. Aerodynamics of propulsion. McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Küchemann, D. and Weber, J. The subsonic flow past swept wings at zero lift without and with body. ARC R & M 2908. 1956.Google Scholar
7. Küchemann, D. A simple method for calculating the span and chordwise loading on straight and swept wings of any given aspect ratio at subsonic speeds. ARC R & M 2935. 1956.Google Scholar
8. Prandtl, L. Tragflügeltheorie. I. Mitteilung. Nach-richten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Math. Phsy. Klasse, p 451. 1918.Google Scholar
9. Jones, R. T. Properties of low-aspect-ratio pointed wings at speeds below and above the speed of sound. NACA Rept 835. 1946.Google Scholar
10.Method for predicting the pressure distribution on swept wings with subsonic attached flow. ESDU Transonic Data Memorandum 73012. June 1973.Google Scholar
11. Bagley, J. A. Some aerodynamic principles for the design of swept wings. RAE Report Aero 2650. May 1961.Google Scholar
12. Maskell, E. C. Flow separation in three dimensions. RAE Report Aero 2565. November 1955.Google Scholar
13. Maskell, E. C. and Küchemann, D. Controlled separation in aerodynamic design. RAE Tech Memo No Aero 463. March 1956.Google Scholar
14. Küchemann, D. Aircraft shapes and their aerodynamics for flight at supersonic speeds. Advances in Aeron. Sciences. Proceedings of the Second International Congress in Aeron. Sciences, Zurich 1960, 3, 221. Pergamon Press. 1962.Google Scholar
15. Küchemann, D. Die aerodynamische Entwicklung von schlanken Flügeln für den Uberschallflug. Jahrbuch 1962 der WGLR, 66. 1962.Google Scholar
16. Edwards, J. B. W. Unpublished RAE note.Google Scholar
17. Gates, S. B. The all-wing aircraft. New Scientist 26, pp 592–594. 1965.Google Scholar
18. Thomas, H. H. B. M. and Küchemann, D. S. B. Gates, 1893–1973. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, Vol 20, pp 182–212. December 1974.Google Scholar
19. Lee, G. H. Possibilities of cost reduction with all-wing aircraft. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 69, No 659, pp 744–749. November 1965.Google Scholar
20. Küchemann, D. The aerodynamic design of aircraft—an inreduction. To be published in 1977.Google Scholar
21. Slaney, R. The publications of Dietrich Küchemann. RAE Library Bibliography 357. 1977.Google Scholar
22.The need for large wind tunnels in Europe. Report of the Large Wind Tunnels Working Group. AGARD-AR-60. December 1972.Google Scholar
23.Facilities and techniques for aerodynamic testing at transonic speeds and high Reynolds number. AGARD CP-83. 1972.Google Scholar
24.Wind tunnel design and testing techniques. AGARD CP-174. 1975.Google Scholar
25. Pearcey, H. H. Aerodynamic design of section shapes for swept wings. Advances in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol III, pp 277–323, Pergamon Press. 1962.Google Scholar
26. Langley, M. J. Unpublished ARA report.Google Scholar
27. Baker, T. J. A numerical mehod to compute inviscid transonic flows around axisymmetric ducted bodies. IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum II, Springer Verlag. 1975.Google Scholar
28. Küchemann, D. Methods of reducing the transonic drag of swept-back wings at zero lift. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 61, pp 37–42. January 1957.Google Scholar
29. Haines, A. B. Wing section design for swept-back wings at transonic speeds. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 61, pp 238–244. January 1957.Google Scholar
30. Küchemann, D. and Hartley, D. E. The design of swept wings and wing-body combinations to have low drag at transonic speeds. RAE Report No Aero 2537. June 1955.Google Scholar
31. Albone, C. M., Hall, M. G. and Joyce, Gaynor. Numerical solutions for transonic flows past wing-body combinations. IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum II, Göttingen 1975. Spr.-Verlag. 1976.Google Scholar
32. Haines, A. B. Aerodynamics. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, pp 277–293. July 1976.Google Scholar
33. Bocci, A. J. Unpublished ARA Report.Google Scholar
34. Ledger, J. A. Computation of the velocity field induced by a planar source distribution approximating a symmetrical non-lifting wing in subsonic flow. RAE TR 72176. 1972.Google Scholar
35. Carr-hill, G. A. Unpublished RAE Report.Google Scholar
36. Lock, R. C. Research in the UK on finite difference methods for computing steady transonic flows. IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum II, Göttingen 1975 Spr.-Verlag. 1976.Google Scholar
37. Chapman, D. R., Mark, H. and Pirtle, M. W. Computers vswind tunnels for aerodynamic flow simulation. Astronautics and Aeronautics, pp 22–30. April 1975.Google Scholar
38. Deiwert, G. S. Numerical simulation of high Reynolds number transonic flows. AIAA Paper 74–603, AIAA 7th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, California. June 1974.Google Scholar
39. Hunt, B. The prediction of external store characteristics by means of the panel method. BAC(MAD) Report Ae/372. January 1977.Google Scholar
40. Garabedian, P. R. and Korn, G. G. Analysis of transonic airfoils. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Vol 24, pp 841–851. 1971.Google Scholar
41. Rizzi, A. Transonic solutions of the Euler equations by the finite volume method. IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum II, Göttingen, pp 567–574. September 1975.Google Scholar
42. Pendleton, A. Experience with a computerised data system for a transonic wind tunnel. ARA Aero Memo 171. September 1975.Google Scholar
43. Catherall, D. The computation of transonic flows past aerofoils in solid, porous or slotted wind tunnels. AGARD CP-174. Paper No 19. October 1975.Google Scholar
44. Vidal, R. J., Erickson, J. C. Jr. and Catlin, P. A. Experiments with a self-correcting wind tunnel. AGARD CP-174. Paper No 11. October 1975.Google Scholar
45. Küchemann, D. Some remarks on the interference between a swept wing and a fuselage. AGARD CP-71-71. Paper No 1. 1971.Google Scholar
46. Hess, J. L. and Smith, A. M. O. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary bodies. Prog, in Aeron. Sci 8, 1. 1976.Google Scholar
47. Pendleton, A. A visual display device for data loggers. ARA Report No 28. September 1972.Google Scholar
48. Küchemann, D. Looking ahead in aeronautics—1. An aerodynamicist's view of the second century. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 72. No 686, pp 109–114. February 1968.Google Scholar