Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T06:32:51.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A framework for environmental risk management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

S. Lloyd,
A. Clifton,
J. Lee,
L. Elghali and
C. France
A. Clifton
Affiliation:
Rolls-Royce, Bristol, UK
J. Lee
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
L. Elghali
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
C. France
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Aero engine designs can have a life time of over 45 years, which is long enough for the understanding of environmental problems to change significantly. This places the aero engine designer in a position of uncertainty, as unforeseen environmental problems could affect the viability of a design. ‘Risk’ is used to describe future uncertainties that can lead to undesirable consequences. This paper presents a framework for environmental risk management that allows the designer to answer the question: what is the risk to a design from its environmental impacts over the life cycle? The framework provides a process for turning complex environmental business hazards into a form that can be used to develop mitigating actions within the design process. The paper demonstrates the framework through two examples and discusses findings, leading to conclusions on what is required to implement the framework into a business.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 116 , Issue 1183 , September 2012, pp. 941 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2012 

References

1. BSI. BS EN ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
2. BSI. BS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management – Principles and guidelines. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, UK, 2009.Google Scholar
3. Lee, J.J. Greener manufacturing, maintenance and disposal – towards the ACARE targets, Aeronaut J, 2006, 110, (1110), pp 567–571.Google Scholar
4. Luttropp, C. Ecodesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of ecodesign and of the papers in this special issue, J Cleaner Production, 2006, 14, pp 1291–1298.Google Scholar
5. Renn, O. Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges. J Risk Research, 1, (1), pp 49–71.Google Scholar
6. RAEng. The Societal Aspects of Risk. Royal Academy of Engineering (RAEng), London, 2003.Google Scholar
7. BSI. BS EN 31010:2010 Risk management – Risk assessment techniques. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
8. Matten, D. Strategy follows structure: environmental risk management in commercial enterprises, Business Strategy and the Environment, 1995, 4, pp 107–116.Google Scholar
9. Sharratt, P.N. and Choong, P.M. A life cycle framework to analyse business risk in process industry projects, J Cleaner Production, 2002, 10, pp 479–493.Google Scholar
10. Elkington, J. and Trisoglio, A. Developing realistic scenarios for the environment: Lessons from Brent Spar, Long Range Planning, 29, (6), pp 762–769.Google Scholar
11. van Weenen, J.C. Towards sustainable product development, J Cleaner Production, 1995, 3, (1-2), pp 95–100.Google Scholar
12. Delay-Saunders, I. Integrating environmental considerations in aircraft design. EngD Thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
13. Ryan, C. Learning from a decade (or so) of ecodesign experience, part 2, J Industrial Ecology, 2006, 8, (4), pp 3–5.Google Scholar
14. Wrisberg, N., Udo de Haes, H.A., Triebswetter, U., Eder, P. and Clift, R. (Eds) Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management from a Systems Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
15. Elghali, L., Clift, R., Begg, K.G. and McLaren, S. Decision support methodology for complex contexts, Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Engineering Sustainability, 2008, 161, (1), pp 7–22.Google Scholar
16. Alonso, E., Gregory, J., Field, F. and Kirchain, R. Material availability and the supply chain: risks, effects, and responses, Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 41, (19), pp 6649–6656.Google Scholar
17. Baumann, H., Boons, F. and Bragd, A. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives, J Cleaner Production, 2002, 10, pp 409–425.Google Scholar
18. Pennington, D.W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T. and Rebitzer, G. Life cycle assessment part 2: Current impact assessment practice, Environment International, 2004, 30, pp 721–739.Google Scholar
19. Duclos, S., Otto, J.P. and Konitzer, D.G. Design in an era of constrained resources. Mechanical Engineering, 2010, September, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).Google Scholar
20. European Commission. Critical raw materials for the EU. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.Google Scholar
21. DEFRA. Review of the future resource risks faced by UK business and an assessment of future viability. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
22. Morley, N. and Eatherley, D. Material security: Ensuring resource availability for the UK economy. C-Tech Innovation Ltd., Chester, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
23. Alonso, E. Materials scarcity from the perspective of manufacturing firms: Effects and strategies. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
24. See www.echa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
25. Commission regulation (EC) no. 1907/2006 of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official J European Union, L 396/1.Google Scholar