Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:54:54.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helicopter icing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Y. Cao  and
K. Chen
Y. Cao
Affiliation:
yihuacs@yahoo.com.cn, Department of Aircraft Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China
K. Chen
Affiliation:
AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Chengdu, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Due to constraints of natural condition, cost and of available time associated with model fabrication and for extensive wind-tunnel tests or flight tests, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation was considered an alternative means of providing air vehicle icing simulation and aeromechanic performance analysis. Full-scale icing experiments and, therefore, certification and cost can be significantly reduced by developing full-numerical simulation methods to evaluate the air vehicle performance for a wide range of icing conditions. This paper summarises helicopter icing simulation methods that include the development of helicopter aerodynamics, calculation methods of helicopter icing, icing protection system performance, icing effects on the helicopter performance, and some challenges in helicopter icing simulation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1152 , February 2010 , pp. 83 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

References

1. Owen, D., Air Accident Investigation, 5, 1998, pp 75–90.Google Scholar
2. Fed Aviat Regul Parts 25, 27, 29, Airworthiness Standards: Transportation Category Airplanes, Normal Category Rotorcraft, and Transport Category Rotorcraft, Appendix C, 1914, Washington, DC, USA: Dep Transp Fed Aviat Admin.Google Scholar
3. Cebeci, T. and Kafyeke, F., Aircraft Icing, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, pp 11–21.10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161217Google Scholar
4. Gent, R.W., Dart, N.P. and Cansdale, J.T., Aircraft icing, Phil Trans R Soc Lond A, 2000, 358, pp 2873–2911.10.1098/rsta.2000.0689Google Scholar
5. Potapczuk, M.G., A review of NASA Lewis’ development plans for computational simulation of aircraft icing, 1999, NASA TM 208904.Google Scholar
6. Gressow, A. and Myers, G.C., Aerodynamics of the Helicopter, College Park Pr, 1952.Google Scholar
7. McCormick, B.W., Aerodynamics of V/STOL flight, NY: Academic Press, New York, USA, 1967.Google Scholar
8. Bramwell, A.R.S., Done, G. and Balmford, D., Helicopter Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., London, UK, 1976.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, W., Helicopter Theory, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Stepniewski, W.Z. and Keys, C.N., Rotary-wing Aerodynamics, NY:Dover Publications, New York, USA, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Seddon, J., Basic Helicopter Aerodynamics, BSP Professional Books, 1990.Google Scholar
12. Johnson, W., Recent developments in rotary-wing aerodynamics theory, AIAA J, 1986, 24, (8), pp 1219–1244.Google Scholar
13. McCroskey, W.J., Vortex wakes of rotorcraft, 1995, AIAA paper 0530.Google Scholar
14. Landgrebe, A.J., The wake geometry of a hovering rotor and its influence on rotor performance, J Am Hel Soc, 1972, 17, (4), pp 3–15.Google Scholar
15. Conlisk, A.T., Modern helicopter aerodynamics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 29, pp 515–567.Google Scholar
16. Addy, H.E., Potatpczuk, J.M.G. and Sheldon, D.W., Modern airfoil ice accretions, 1997, AIAA paper 0174.Google Scholar
17. Addy, H.E., Ice accretions and icing effects for modern airfoils, 2002, NASA TP 210031.Google Scholar
18. Coffman, H.J., Review of helicopter icing protection systems, 1983, AIAA paper 2529.Google Scholar
19. Flemming, R.J., Murty, H. and Papadakis, M., et al, The design, fabrication, and testing of simulated ice shapes for the S-92A helicopter, 2004, AIAA paper, 736.Google Scholar
20. Wright, W.B., Lewice 2.2 Capabilities and thermal validation, 2002, AIAA paper 0383.Google Scholar
21. Wright, W.B., A summary of validation results for LEWICE 2.0, 1999, AIAA paper 0249.Google Scholar
22. Habashi, W.G., Morency, F. and Beaugendre, H., FENASP-ICE: A Second Generation 3D CFD-based In-Flight Icing Simulation System, 2003, SAE2003-01-2157.Google Scholar
23. Crock, G., Beaugendre, H. and Habashi, W.G., CHT3D: FENSAP-ICE conjugate heat transfer computations with droplet impingement and runback effects, 2002, AIAA paper 0386.Google Scholar
24. Narramore, J.C., Tran, P., Habashi, W.G., et al, Reducing icing certification flight tests through second-generation 3-D CFD-based technologies, AHS 58th Annual Forum, June 11-13, 2002, pp 40–47.Google Scholar
25. Narramore, J.C., Tran, P. and Habashi, W.G., et al, Ice accretion computation for full tiltrotor configurations, AHS 59th Annual Forum, May 6-8, 2003, pp 1433–1440.Google Scholar
26. Myers, T.G., Charpin, J.P.F. and Thompson, C.P., Slowly accreting ice due to supercooled water impacting on a cold surface, Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14, (1), pp 240–256 10.1063/1.1416186Google Scholar
27. Bartlett, P., Development of a new model of ice accretion on aircraft, 9th Int. Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures (IWAIS 2000), 5-8 June, 2000, Chester, UK.Google Scholar
28. Flemming, R.J., The past twenty years of icing research and development at Sikorsky aircraft, 2002, AIAA paper 0238.Google Scholar
29. Hedde, T. and Guffond, D., Development of a there-dimensional icing code, comparison with experimental shapes, 1992, AIAA paper 0041.Google Scholar
30. Hedde, T. and Guffond, D., Improvement of the ONERA 3D icing code, comparison with 3D experiment shapes, 1993, AIAA paper 0169.Google Scholar
31. Ai-Khalil, K.M., Irani, E. and Rowley, D., Tunnel and natural icing tests of a helicopter engine cooling bay inlet, 2001, AIAA paper 0838.Google Scholar
32. Miller, D., Bond, T. and Sheldon, D., et al, Validation of NASA Thermal Ice Protection Computer Codes Part 1 – Program Overview, 1997, AIAA paper 0049.Google Scholar
33. Shim, J., Chung, J. and Lee, K.D., A computational investigation of ice geometry effects on airfoil performances, 2001, AIAA paper 0540.Google Scholar
34. Britton, R.K., Bond, T.H. and Flemming, R.J., An overview of a model rotor icing test in the NASA lewis icing research tunnel, 1994, AIAA paper 0716.Google Scholar
35. Flemming, R.J. and Lednicer, D.A., High speed ice accretion on rotor-craft airfoils, 1985, NASA CR 3910.Google Scholar
36. Kwon, O.J. and Sankar, L.N., Numerical investigation of performance degradation of wings and rotors due to icing, 1992, AIAA paper 0412.Google Scholar
37. Britton, R.K., Development of an analytical method to predict helicopter main rotor performance in icing conditions, 1992, AIAA paper 0418.Google Scholar
38. FLemming, R.J., Britton, R.K. and Bond, T.H., Role of wind tunnels and computer codes in the certification and qualification of rotorcraft for flight in forecast icing, 1994, NASA TM 106747.Google Scholar
39. Flemming, R.J., Performance characteristics of a model rotor inicing, 1995, AHS International Icing Symposium ‘95 Proceedings.Google Scholar