Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T00:23:28.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the Digital Computer on Engineering Sciences: Part 2

Part of:RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. H. Argyris
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Space Division of the North American Rockwell Corporation has developed a comprehensive computer-based heat transfer and thermal analysis capability especially for design support of the Apollo command module. The heat transfer analysis primarily centres about the solution of the diffusion equation using finite difference approximations. Since most problems encountered are non-linear in nature this approach has proved highly effective in producing accurate results economically. Recent studies, however, indicate that heat transfer problems are most successfully analysed by the finite element method. On the other hand, the finite element method in this field of application was not yet established when North American initiated this work. Lack of time does not allow a deserved discussion of this topic.

Information

Type
12th Lanchester Memorial Lecture
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 74 , Issue 710 , February 1970, pp. 111 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

1. Kármán, TH. V. Lanchester's Contributions to the Theory of Flight and Operational Research. JRAeS, Vol 62, No 566, February 1958.Google Scholar
2. Lanchester, F. W. The Part Played by Skin-Friction in Aeronautics, JRAeS, Vol 41, February 1937.Google Scholar
3. Lanchester, F. W. Sustenation in Flight. JRAeS, Vol 49, 1945.Google Scholar
4. Hess, J. L. and Smith, A. M. O. Calculation of Potential Flow about Arbitrary Bodies. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 8, 1967.Google Scholar
5. Gentry, A. E. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Arbitrary Three-Dimensional Shapes at Hypersonic Speeds. Douglas Aircraft Company, Long Beach, California. Aerospace Proceedings, Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
6. Jaffe, N. A., Okamura, T. T. and Smith, A. M. O. The Determination of Spatial Amplification Factors and their Application to Predicting Transition. Douglas Paper No 5504, December 1968.Google Scholar
7. Cebeci, T. Laminar and Turbulent Incompressible Boundary Layers on Slender Bodies of Revolution in Axial Flow. Douglas Paper No 5524, December 1968.Google Scholar
8. Cebeci, T. and Smith, A. M. O. A Finite-Difference Solution of the Incompressible Turbulent Boundary- Layer Equations by an Eddy-Viscosity Concept. Douglas Paper No 4958, July 1968.Google Scholar
9. Smith, A. M. O. and Cebeci, T. Numerical Solution of the Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Equations. Douglas Re port No DAC 33735, May 1967.Google Scholar
10. Smith, A. M. O. Recent Progress in the Calculation of Potential Flows. Douglas Paper No 5022, August 1968.Google Scholar
11. Giesing, J. P. Non-Linear Two-Dimensional Unsteady Potential Flow with Lift. Douglas Paper No 3994, December 1966.Google Scholar
12. Bauer, A. B., Smith, A. M. O. and Hess, J. L. Potential Flow and Boundary Layer Theory as Design Tools in Aerodynamics. Douglas Paper No 5280, November 1968.Google Scholar
13. Faulkner, S., Hess, J. L. and Giesing, J. P. Comparison of Experimental Pressure Distributions with those Calculated by the Douglas Neumann Program. Douglas Report No LB 31831, December 1964.Google Scholar
14. Jaffe, N. A. The Numerical Solution of the Nonsimilar Laminar Boundary-Layer Equations Including the Effects of Nonequiiibrium Dissociation. Douglas Paper No 5550, February 1969.Google Scholar
15. Giesing, J. P. Potential Flow about Two-Dimensional Airfoils. Douglas Report No LB 31946, December 1965. Revised May 1968.Google Scholar
16. Smith, A. M. O. and Pierce, J. Exact Solutions of the Neumann Problem. Calculation of Non-Circulatory Plane and Axially Symmetric Flows about or within Arbitrary Boundaries. Douglas Report No ES 26988, April 1958.Google Scholar
17. Babaev, D. A. Numerical Solution of the Problem of Supersonic Flow Past the Lower Surface of a Delta Wing. AlAA Journal, Vol 1, No 9, September 1963.Google Scholar
18. Hall, M. G. A Numerical Method for Calculating Steady Three-Dimensional Laminar Boundary Layers. RAE Technical Report No 67145, June 1967.Google Scholar
19. Hall, M. G. A Numerical Method for Calculating Unsteady Two-Dimensional Laminar Boundary Layers. RAE Technical Report No 68102, May 1968.Google Scholar
20. Harlow, F. H. and Fromm, J. E. Dynamics and Heat Transfer in the von Karman Wake of a Rectangular Cylinder. The Physics of Fluids, Vol 7, August 1964.Google Scholar
21. Yoshizawa, Y. A Monte Carlo Calculation of a Chemically Reacting Gas. Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Fifth Symposium, Vol 1, Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
22. Ujihara, B. H. et al. An Analytical Study of Separated Flow about a Circular Cylinder. NAR Space Division, Report No SID 65-1730, January 1966.Google Scholar
23. Argyris, J. H. Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis, (a) Part 1, General Theory. Aircraft Engineering. Vol 26, 1954. Oct, pp 347–356, Nov, pp 383–387, 394, Vol 27, 1955: Feb, pp 42–58. March, pp 80–94, April, pp 125–134, May, pp 145–158. Argyris, J. H. and Kelsey, S. (b) Part II, Applications to Thermal Stress Analysis and to Upper and Lower Limits of St. Venant Torsion Constant. Aircraft Engineering, Vol 26, 1954, Dec, pp 410–422. Also published London, Butterworths, 1960.Google Scholar
24. Argyris, J. H. and Kelsey, S. Modern Fuselage Analysis and the Elastic Aircraft. Butterworths, 1963.Google Scholar
25. Balmer, H. A., Bernhardt, K., Buck, K. E., Fuchs, G. V., Hilber, H. M., König, M., Roy, J. R., Schrem, E. and Sörensen, M. Automatic System for Kinematic Analysis (ASKA). Research Report No 8 issued by the Institut fur Statik und Dynamik der Luft- und Raum-fahrtkonstruktionen, October 1965 (Resumé to be published externally).Google Scholar
26. Argyris, J. H. Continua and Discontinua. Opening Address to the International Conference on Matrix Methods of Structural Mechanics, Dayton, Ohio, Wright- Patterson USAF Base, 26th October 1965. Published in the Proceedings of the Conference by US Government, pp 1–198, January 1967.Google Scholar
27. Brönlund, O. E., Kollmann, W., Malejannakis, G. A. and Straub, K. Dynan Preliminary Manual, 1SD Report No 61, 1969.Google Scholar
28. Mlejnek, H. P. Some Results of the Dynamic Analysis of the Starfighter F 104-G. 27th Meeting, Structures and Materials Panel (AGARD), Stuttgart, November 1968.Google Scholar
29. Argyris, J. H. and Fried, I. The LUMINA Element for the Matrix Displacement Method. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 690, June 1968.Google Scholar
30. Argyris, J. H., Fried, I. and Scharpf, D. W. The TET20 and TEA Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 691, July 1968.Google Scholar
31. Argyris, J. H., Fried, I. and Scharpf, D. W. The HERMES 8 Element for the Matrix Displacement Method. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 691, July 1968.Google Scholar
32. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. A Sequel to Technical Note 13: The Curved Tetrahedronal and Triangu lar Elements TEC and TRIC for the Matrix Displacement Method. Part 1: Small Displacements. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 697, January 1969.Google Scholar
33. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. A Sequel to Technical Note 13: The Curved Tetrahedronal and Triangular Elements TEC and TRIC for the Matrix Displacement Method. Part II: Large Displacements. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 697, January 1969.Google Scholar
34. Argyris, J. H., Fried, I. and Scharpf, D. W. The TUBA Family of Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 692, August 1968.Google Scholar
35. Argyris, J. H. and Buck, K. E. A Sequel to Technical Note 14 on the TUBA Family of Plate Elements. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 695, November 1968.Google Scholar
36. Morley, L. S. D. The Triangular Equilibrium Element in the Solution of Plate Bending Problems. The Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol XIX, Part 2, May 1968.Google Scholar
37. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. The SHEBA Family of Shell Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 694, October 1968.Google Scholar
38. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. Some General Considerations on the Natural Mode Technique. Part I, Small Displacement. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 699, March 1969.Google Scholar
39. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. Some General Considerations on the Natural Mode Technique. Part II, Large Displacement. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 700, April 1969.Google Scholar
40. Fluegge, W. Stresses in Shells. Springer, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg-New York, 1966.Google Scholar
41. Witmer, E. A. and Kotanchik, J. J. Progress Report on Discrete-Element Elastic and Elastic-Plastic Analyses of Shells of Revolution Subjected to Axisymmetric and Asymmetric Loading. 2nd Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Analysis, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. October 1968.Google Scholar
42. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. The SHEBA Family of Shell Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method. Part III, Large Displacements. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 701, May 1969.Google Scholar
43. Kalnins, A. Analysis of Shells of Revolution, Subjected to Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Loads. Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, September 1964.Google Scholar
44. Buck, K. E. Zur Berechnung der Verschiebungen und Spannungen in rotations-symmetrischen Körpern unter beliebiger Belastung, Dr.-Ing Thesis to be submitted at the University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
45. Rodden, W. P. A Matrix Approach to Flutter Analysis. North American Aviation, Inc, Report NA-56-1070 (IAS Fairchild Fund Paper FF-23).Google Scholar
46. Turner, M. J., Clough, R. W., Martin, H. C., Topp, L. J. Stiffness and Deflection Analysis of Complex Structures. Journal Aero Sciences, Vol 23, No 9, pp. 805–823, 1956.Google Scholar
47. Denke, P. H. Matrix Structural Analysis. Second National Congress of Applied Mechanics, Ann Arbor, Mich. June 1954.Google Scholar
48. Rodden, W. P. and Reveix, J. D. The Status of Un steady Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients. IAS 30th Annual Meeting, January 22 1962 (IAS Fairchild Fund Paper FF-33).Google Scholar
49. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F., Malcolm, H. A. and Kliszewski, A. M. Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients from Supersonic Strip Theory: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division, Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-1, August 1962.Google Scholar
50. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F., Malcolm, H. A. and Kliszewski, A. M. Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients from Piston Theory: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure, Aerospace Corporation, Labora- ties Division, Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-2, August 1962.Google Scholar
51. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Kliszewski, A. M. Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients from Incompressible Strip Theory: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division. Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-5, September 1962.Google Scholar
52. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Malcolm, H. A. Harmonic Gust Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients from Incompressible Strip Theory: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division. Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-4, September 1962.Google Scholar
53. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Takata, G. Y. Aero dynamic Influence Coefficients from Slender-Body Theory: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division, Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-6, October 1962.Google Scholar
54. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Malcolm, H. A. Quasi-Static Aero-Thermo-Elastic Analysis: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division. Report No TDR- 169(3230-11) TN-8, March 1963.Google Scholar
55. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Malcolm, H. A. Flutter and Vibration Analysis by a Collocation Method: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division. Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN-14, July 1963.Google Scholar
56. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F. and Malcolm, H. A. Flutter and Vibration Analysis by a Modal Method: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure, Aerospace Corporation, Laboratories Division. Report No TDR-169(3230-11) TN 15, July 1963.Google Scholar
57. Core, T. C. et al. Private Communication.Google Scholar
58. Robertson, J. M. Apollo Command and Service Modules Simulation. AIAA Paper No 67-231, AIAA Flight Test, Simulation and Support Conference, Cocoa Beach, Florida, February 1967.Google Scholar
59. McPhail, C. D. Apollo External Simulation Display Systems. AIAA Paper No 67-253. AIAA Flight Test, Simulation and Support Conference, Cocoa Beach, Florida, February 1967.Google Scholar
60. Hoskins, W. R. Apollo Hybrid Real-Time Simulation. AIAA Paper No 67-255. AIAA Flight Test, Simulation and Support Conference, February 1967.Google Scholar
61. Acceptance Checkout Equipment in Spacecraft—ACE Requirements Engineers Space Division Report No 64-38B, September 1966.Google Scholar
62. Thwaites, B. 1984: Mathematics-Computers? The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, November 1967.Google Scholar
63. Gloudeman, J. F. The Next 100 Years? Paper presented to MCCM, Berchtesgaden, April 1969.Google Scholar
64. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. The FUGA Family for Folded Plate Structures. AJRAeS, Vol 73, July 1969.Google Scholar
65. Lyon, R. G., et al. Interactive Graphics Applications at the Space Division of North American Rockwell Corporation. April 1969. Private communication.Google Scholar
1. Willes, M. V. Computers Then and Now. 1967 ACM Turing Lecture, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol 15, No 1, January 1968.Google Scholar
2. Platt, M. Lanchester and the Motor Vehicle. Lanchester Centenary Lectures, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, The Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1968.Google Scholar
3. Stephens, A. V. The Aeronautical Work of F. W. Lanchester. Lanchester Centenary Lectures, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, The Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1968.Google Scholar
4. Wilkes, W. V. The Coming of Multiple-Access Computers. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 676, April 1967, and The Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering. A Joint Symposium with the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 1966.Google Scholar
5. Leslie, W. H. P. Computer Graphical Design Aids. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 676, April 1967, and The Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering. A Joint Symposium with the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 1966.Google Scholar
6 Argyris, J. H. and Patton, P. C. A Look into the Future, How Computers will Influence Engineering. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 676, April 1967, and The Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering. A Joint Symposium with the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 1966.Google Scholar
7. Eccles, E. S. The Use of a Digital Computer for On- Line Control of a Jet Engine. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 676, April 1967, and The Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering. A Joint Symposium with the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 1966.Google Scholar
8. Taig, I. C. The Computer in the Stress and Design Offices. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 676, April 1967, and The Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering. A Joint Symposium with the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 1966.Google Scholar
9. Proceedings of the Conference on High-Speed Aeronautics. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, January 1955.Google Scholar
10. Binder, R. C. Fluid Mechanics. Prentice-Hall Inc, 1955. 3rd Edition.Google Scholar
11. Miele, A. Theory of Optimum Aerodynamic Shapes, Extremal Problems in the Aerodynamics of Supersonic, Hypersonic, and Free-Molecular Flows. Academic Press, New York, London, 1965.Google Scholar
12. Martynov, A. K. Practical Aerodynamics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, New York, Paris, Frankfurt, 1965.Google Scholar
13. Sovran, G. Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flow. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flow. General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan, 1965. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, London, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
14. Belotserkovskii, S. M. The Theory of Thin Wings in Subsonic Flow. Plenum Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
15. Bundin, C. L. Rarefied Gas Dynamics. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Held at the University of Oxford, Vols I and II. Academic Press, New York, London, 1967.Google Scholar
16. Ferri, A., Küchemann, D. and Sterne, L. H. G. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, New York, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
17. Küchemann, D., et al. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 9. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Braunschweig, 1968.Google Scholar
18. Allen, J. E. Looking Ahead in Aeronautics, The Second Century Papers, AJRAeS, Vol 72, January 1968.Google Scholar
19. Blottner, F. G. Viscous Shock Layer Problem for the Stagnation Point of a Blunt Body. AGARD Seminar on Numerical Methods for Viscous Flows. NPL, Teddington, England, 18-21 September 1967.Google Scholar
20. Cheng, H. K. and Lee, R. S. Freezing of Dissociation and Recombination in Supersonic Nozzle Flows: Part II. More General Analysis and Numerical Example. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 5, May 1968.Google Scholar
21. Chorin, A. J. A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems. Journal of Computational Physics 2, 12–26, 1967.Google Scholar
22. Chu, C. K. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. IV. AIAA Selected Reprint Series.Google Scholar
23. Chung, P. M., Holt, J. F. and Liu, S. W. Merged Stagnation Shock Layer of Nonequilibrium Dissociating Gas. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 12, December 1968.Google Scholar
24. Coleman, B. D. and Dill, E. H. On the Stability of Certain Motions of Incompressible Materials with Memory. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol 30, No 3, 1968.Google Scholar
25. Cooke, J. C. and Mangler, K. W. The Numerical Solution of the Laminar Boundary Layer Equations for an Ideal Gas in Two and Three Dimensions. RAE TM Aero 999, August 1967.Google Scholar
26. Davies, H. Some Thoughts about the Future of European Aeronautics. The Twenty-First Louis Blériot Lecture. AJRAeS, Vol 72, May 1968.Google Scholar
27. Davis, R. T. The Hypersonic Fully Viscous Shock-Layer Problem. NASA Grant NGR-47-004-006.Google Scholar
28. Dennis, S. C. R., Hudson, J. D. and Smith, N. Steady Laminar Forced Convection from a Circular Cylinder at Low Reynolds Numbers. The Physics of Fluids, Vol 11, No 5, May 1968.Google Scholar
29. Dennis, S. C. R. A Numerical Method for Calculating Two-Dimensional Wakes. University of Western Ontario Report.Google Scholar
30. Gerking, L. Ein Verfahren zur Lösung der Navier-Stokesschen Gleichungen mit Integralbedingungen und seine Anwendung auf die Strömung urn eine endlich lange ebene Platte, Dr.-Ing. Thesis, University of Karls ruhe, October 1967.Google Scholar
31. Griffith, B. J. and Lewis, C. H. Laminar Heat Transfer to Spherically Blunted Cones at Hypersonic Conditions. AIAA Journal, Vol 2, No 3, March 1964.Google Scholar
32. Guyan, R. J. Ujihara, B. H. and Welch, P. W. Hydro-elastic Analysis of Axisymmetric Systems by a Finite Element Method. North American Rockwell Corporation Report. Also presented at 2nd Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, October 1968.Google Scholar
33. Hall, M. G. A Numerical Method for Solving the Equations for a Vortex Core. RAE Tech Report No 65 106-ARC 27 150, 1965.Google Scholar
34. Hornung, H. G. Inviscid Hypersonic Flow over Plane Power-Law Bodies. J Fluid Mech, Vol 27, Part 2, 1967.Google Scholar
35. Jaffe, N. A., Lind, R. C. and Smith, A. M. O. Solution to the Binary Diffusion Laminar Boundary-Layer Equtions with Second-Order Transverse Curvature. AIAA Journal, Vol 5, No 9, September 1967.Google Scholar
36. Jones, J. G. A Method for Designing Lifting Configuarations for High Supersonic Speeds using the Flow Fields of Non-Lifting Cones. RAe Report No Aero 2674, March 1963.Google Scholar
37. Kendall, R. M. and Bartlett, E. P. Nonsimilar Solution of the Multicomponent Laminar Boundary Layer by an Integral-Matrix Method. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 6, June 1968.Google Scholar
38. Küchemann, D. Aerodynamic Design. The Fourth Reynolds-Prandtl Lecture. AJRAeS, Vol 73, No 698, February 1969.Google Scholar
39. Küchemann, D. Looking Ahead in Aeronautics—1, An Aerodynamicist's Prospect of the Second Century. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 680, February 1968.Google Scholar
40. Lee, R. S. and Cheng, H. K. Higher-Order Approximations in the Theory of Hypersonic Boundary Layers on Slender Bodies. University of Southern California Report.Google Scholar
41. Lewis, C. H. First- and Second-Order Boundary-Layer Effects at Hypersonic Conditions. AGARD Seminar on Numerical Methods for Viscous Flows, September 1967, at the NPL, Teddington, England.Google Scholar
42. Loftin, L. K. Research Relating to Long-Range Supersonic Cruising Aircraft. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 690, June 1968.Google Scholar
43. Magnus, R. J. and Gallaher, W. H. Rarefied Hypersonic Flow over the Forward Part of a Blunted Cone. AGARD Seminar on Numerical Flows, NPL, Teddington, England, September 1967.Google Scholar
44. Nonweiler, T. R. F. Aerodynamic Problems of Manned Space Vehicles. JRAeS, Vol 63, No 585, September 1959.Google Scholar
45. Nonweiler, T. Delta Wings of Shapes Amenable to Exact Shock-Wave Theory. JRAeS, Vol 67, No 625, January 1963.Google Scholar
46. O'hara, F. and Burnham, J. The Second Century Papers: Looking Ahead in Aeronautics—5, The Atmospheric Environment and Aircraft—Now and the Future. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 690, June 1968.Google Scholar
47. Runchal, A. K. and Wolfshtein, A. Finite-Difference Procedure for the Integration of the Navier-Stokes Equation, Imperial College of Science and Technology Report (Department of Mechanical Engineering), No SF/TN/1, July 1966.Google Scholar
48. Rusanov, V. V. Studies of Flows Around Blunt Bodies by Numerical Methods. USSR Academy of Science Report, Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar
49. Scala, S. M. and Gordon, P. Solution of the Time-Dependent Navier-Stokes Equations for the Flow Around a Circular Cylinder. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 5, May 1968.Google Scholar
50. Sells, C. C. L. Plane Subcritical Flow Past a Lifting Aerofoil. Proc Roy Soc A 308, 1968.Google Scholar
51. Sells, C. C. L. Two-Dimensional Laminar Compressible Boundary-Layer Programme for a Perfect Gas. MinTech Report No 3533, 1968.Google Scholar
52. Smith, J. H. B. Improved Calculations of Leading-Edge Separation from Slender, Thin, Delta Wings. Proc Roy Soc A 306, 1968.Google Scholar
53. Stewartson, K. and Thompson, B. W. On One-Dimensional Unsteady Flow at Infinite Mach Number. Proc Roy Soc A 304, 1968.Google Scholar
54. Szewczyk, A. A., Thoman, D. C. and Kopfer, J. Numerical Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations for Time Dependent Flow Past a Circular Cylinder. University of Notre Dame Report.Google Scholar
55. Thwaites, B. The Second Century Papers: Looking Ahead in Aeronautics—3, The Future Role of Computers with Special Reference to Aerodynamic Design. AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 688, April 1968.Google Scholar
56. Ujihara, B. H., Oder, H. S. and Harris, L. A. Simulated High Reynolds Number Flow about a Circular Cylinder. North American Rockwell Corporation (Space Division) Report No SD 68-33 22, NAS-4327, August 1968.Google Scholar
57. Duncan, W. J., Thom, A. S. and Young, A. D. An Elementary Treatise on the Mechanics of Fluids. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London. 1960.Google Scholar
58. Argyris, J. H. and Patton, P. C. Computer Oriented Research in a University Milieu. Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol 19, No 12, December 1966.Google Scholar
59. Mallett, R. H., Braun, W. F. and Hunter, D. T. Structural Analysis Practices for Large Scale Systems. Bell Aerosystems Report.Google Scholar
60. Przemieniecki, J. S., Bader, R. M., Bozich, W. F., Johnson, J. R. and Mykytow, W. J. Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics. Proceedings of Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Institute of Technology, Report No AFFDL-TR-66-80, 1965.Google Scholar
61. Bisplinghoff, R. L., Ashley, H. and Halfman, R. L. Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, November 1957.Google Scholar
62. Fung, Y. C. An Introduction to The Theory of Aero-elasticity. John Wiley and Sons, London, 1955.Google Scholar
63. Kariappa, and Somashekar, B. R. Application of Matrix Displacement Methods in the Study of Panel Flutter. AIAA Journal, Vol 7, No 1, January 1969.Google Scholar
64. Rodden, W. P. Aeroelasticity Course Notes, USC, 1962–1967.Google Scholar
65. Rodden, W. P., Farkas, E. F., Commerford, G. L. and Malcolm, H. A. Structural Influence Coefficients for a Redundant System Including Beam-Column Effects: Analytical Development and Computational Procedure. Aerospace Corporation Report No TDR-469(5240-10)-7, April 1965.Google Scholar
66. Jakob, M. and Hawkins, G. A. Elements of Heat Transfer and Insulation. John Wiley and Sons, New York; Chapman and Hall, London. Second Edition, January 1957.Google Scholar
67. Schuh, H. Heat Transfer in Structures. Pergamon Press, 1965.Google Scholar
68. Garabedian, P. R. Partial Differential Equations. John Wiley and Sons, New York, London, Sydney, 1964.Google Scholar
69. Ibele, W. Modern Developments in Heat Transfer. Academic Press, New York and London, 1963.Google Scholar
70. Frank, A. J., Knotts, E. F. and Johnson, B. C. An Entry Monitor System for Maneuverable Vehicles. J Spacecraft, Vol 3, No 8, August 1966.Google Scholar
71. Cohen, J. B., Gardner, G. O. and Romberg, B. W. Design Automation in Ship Detailing. Proceedings ACM National Meeting, 1967.Google Scholar
72. Mitchell, J. R., Moore, J. W. and Trauboth, H. H. Digital Simulation of an Aerospace Vehicle. Proceedings ACM National Meeting, 1967.Google Scholar
73. Brender, K. D. and Llewellyn, C. P. Development and Utilization of a Space Station Mission Simulation Model. Proceedings ACM National Meeting, 1967.Google Scholar
74. De Wrr, G. J. Reliability and Utilisation of Flight Simulators. Technical Notes, AJRAeS, Vol 72, No 685, January 1968.Google Scholar
75. Parslow, R. D., Prowse, R. W. and Green, R. E. Computer Graphics, Techniques and Applications. Plenum Press, London and New York, 1969.Google Scholar
76. Churchhouse, R. F. and Herz, J. C. Computers in Mathematical Research. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1968.Google Scholar
77. Project MAC Progress Report II. MIT, July 1964 to July 1965.Google Scholar
78. Sutherland, I. E. Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. MIT, Lincoln Laboratory, Technical Report No 296, January 1963.Google Scholar
79. Lindley, R. N. The Gemini Programme from an Engineering Point of View. JRAeS, Vol 71, No 681, September 1967.Google Scholar
80. Coons, S. A. and Herzog, B. Surfaces for Computer-Aided Aircraft Design. J Aircraft, Vol 5, July-Aug 1968.Google Scholar
81. Genthner, H. J. Interactive Computer Graphics. Computers and Automation, November 1968.Google Scholar
82. Logan, J. R. Computer Graphics in Electronic Circuit Design. Computers and Automation, November 1968.Google Scholar
83. Van Gieson, W. D. Jr. and Chapman, W. D. Machine-Generated Speech for Use with Computers, and the Problem of Fitting a Spoken Word into one Half Second. Computers and Automation, November 1968.Google Scholar
84. Noll, A. M. Stereographic Projections by Digital Computer. Computers and Automation, May 1965.Google Scholar
85. Goodenough, J. B. A Lightpen-Controlled Program for Online Data Analysis. Communications of the ACM, Vol 8, No 2, February 1965.Google Scholar
86. Gray, J. C. Compound Data Structure for Computer Aided Design; A Survey. Proceedings ACM National Meeting, 1967.Google Scholar
87. Ross, D. T. The AED Approach to Generalized Computer-Aided Design. Proceedings ACM National Meeting, 1967.Google Scholar
88. Interactive Graphics in Data Processing. IBM Systems Journal, Vol 7, No 3 and 4, 1968.Google Scholar
89. Digigraphic System 270, Digigraphic Man—Machine Systems. System Information Manual Control Data Corporation Report No 270-SIM32-965-1.Google Scholar
90. Bardorf, W. J., Kapur, S. S. and Sayer, R. B. The Role of Computer Graphics in the Structural Design Process. Lockheed-Georgia Company Report.Google Scholar
91. IBM Annual Report 1968.Google Scholar
92. A Visual Display System for Dynamic Design. Third Annual Report to The Science Research Council, Computer-Aided Design Project, Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, August 1967.Google Scholar
93. Computer Graphics for Engineering Design. Fourth Annual Report to The Science Research Council, Computer-Aided Design Project, Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, August 1968.Google Scholar
94. Walker, A. F. and Aperghis, G. G. Modern Abacus or Something More? Computer Aided Design, 1968.Google Scholar
95. Breuning, S. M. Automated Highways: What is the Dream and How do we Reach it? Project Transport, MIT.Google Scholar
96. Morrison, P. Intellectual Prospects for the Year 2000: The Natural Sciences, MIT Report.Google Scholar
97. Winograd, H. HOW Fast Can Computers Addl Google Scholar
98. McLaughlan, R. A. The CDC 7600. Datamation, January 1969.Google Scholar
99. Seifert, H. S. Space Technology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
100. Riley, F. E. and Sailor, J. D. Space Systems Engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York, Toronto, London, 1962.Google Scholar
101. Jensen, J., Townsend, G., Kork, J. and Kraft, D. Design Guide to Orbital Flight. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Toronto, London, 1962.Google Scholar
102. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol 23, 1963. Spring Joint Computer Conference. Spartan Books Inc, 1963.Google Scholar
103. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol 26, Part II, 1964. Fall Joint Computer Conference. Spartan Books Inc, 1965.Google Scholar
104. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol 29, 1966. Fall Joint Computer Conference. Spartan Books Inc, 1966.Google Scholar
105. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol 31, 1967. Fall Joint Computer Conference. Thompson Books, 1967.Google Scholar
106. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol 32. 1968. Spring Joint Computer Conference. Thompson Books, 1968.Google Scholar