Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:58:01.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and electromagnetic behaviour of auxetic honeycomb structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

F. Scarpa,
F. C. Smith,
B. Chambers and
G. Burriesci
F. Scarpa
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield, UK
F. C. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield, UK
B. Chambers
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield, UK
G. Burriesci
Affiliation:
University of Palermo, Italy
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work a combined analysis of the out-of-plane mechanical and the electromagnetic properties of auxetic re-entrant honeycombs is performed. Experimental and numerical simulations are carried out to evaluate the correlation between the anisotropicity of the transverse mechanical properties (shear and compressive modulus) and the permittivity tensor of auxetic honeycombs. The results are evaluated to assess the feasibility of this kind of cellular solid for electromagnetic absorption and window applications with high structural integrity performance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1069 , March 2003, pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Timoshenko, S.P. History of Strength of Materials, 1953, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
2 Evans, K.E. Auxetic polymers: a new range of materials, Endeavour, New Series, 1991, 15, (4), pp 170–174.Google Scholar
3 Lakes, R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson's ratio. Science, 1987, 235, pp 1038–1040.Google Scholar
4 Evans, K.E. Microstructural modelling of auxetic microporoues polymers, J Mat Sci, 1995, 30, pp 3319–3332.Google Scholar
5 Scarpa, F. and Tomlinson, G. Investigation on negative Poisson's ratio honeycombs, 1998, Fourth seminar on experimental techniques and design in composites, Found, M.S. (Ed), 1–2 September 1998, Sheffield.Google Scholar
6 Scarpa, F. and Tomlinson, G. Theoretical characteristics of the vibration of sandwich plates with in-plane negative Poisson's ratio values, J Sound Vib, 2000, 230. (1). pp 45–67.Google Scholar
7 Anderson, K.L. and Evans, K.E. The fabrication of microporous polyethylene having a negative Poisson's ratio, Polymer, 1992, 33, (20), pp 4435–4438.Google Scholar
8 Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. Cellular Solids-Structure and Properties,Second edition, 1997, Cambridge Press, UK.Google Scholar
9 Clarke, J.F., Duckett, R.A., Hine, P.J., Hutchinson, I.J. and Ward, I.M. Negative Poisson's ratios in angle-ply laminates: theory and experiment. Composites, 1994, 25, (9), pp 863–868.Google Scholar
10 Warren, W.E and Kraynik, A.M. Foam mechanics: the linear elastic response of two-dimensional spatially periodic cellular materials. Mechanics Mater, 1987, 6, pp 27–31.Google Scholar
11 Masters, I.G. and Evans, K.E. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs, Comp Struct, 1996, 34, (4), pp 403–422.Google Scholar
12 Scarpa, F., Panayiotou, P. and Tomlinson, G. Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs, J Strain Analysis, 2000, 35, (5), pp 383–388.Google Scholar
13 ASTM Standard E 1091–98, Standard specification for nonmetallic honeycomb core for use in shelter panels.Google Scholar
14 Hallquist, J.O. Ls-Dyna theoretical manual, 1998, Livermore Software Technology Corp.Google Scholar
15 Bettermann, J. and Wentzel, H. Design features and test of low observable structures for large aircrafts, 1993, Third international conference on electromagnetics in aerospace applications, 14–17 September 1993, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
16 Smith, F.C Effective permittivity of dielectric honeycombs, Proceedings of Institute of Electrical Engineers, Microwave antennas, Propagat, 1999, 146, (1), pp 55–59.Google Scholar
17 Zhang, J. and Ashby, M.F. The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs, Int J Mech Sci, 1992, 34, (6), pp 475–489.Google Scholar
18 ASTM Standard C365-00, Standard test method for flatwise compression properties.Google Scholar
19 ANSYS Rel. 5.6 User's Manual, 2000, Swanson.Google Scholar
20 Grediac, M. A. finite element study of the transverse shear in honeycomb cores, Int J Solids Struct, 1993, 30, pp 1777–1788.Google Scholar
21 Scarpa, F. and Tomlin, P.J. On the transverse shear modulus of negative Poisson's ratio honeycomb structures, Futique Fractures Eng Mat Structures, 2000, 23, pp 717–720.Google Scholar
22 Johnson, R. Radar-absorbing material: a passive role in an active scenario, 2001, http://www.randf.com/ramapriaas.html. Google Scholar
23 Smith, F.C., Scarpa, F. and Chambers, B. The electromagnetic properties of re-entrant dielectric honeycombs, IEEE Microw, Guided Wave Lett, 2000, 10, (11), pp 451–453.Google Scholar
24 Clarkson, B.L. and Ranky, M.F. Modal density of honeycomb plates, J Sound Vib, 1983, 91, pp 103–118.Google Scholar
25 Larsen, U.D., Sigmund, O. and Bouwstra, S. Design and fabrication of compliant mechanisms and structures with negative Poisson's ratio, J Microelectronic Syst, 1997, 6, (2), pp 99–106.Google Scholar
26 Scarpa, F., Remillat, C., Landi, F.P. and Tomlinson, G. Damping modelisation of auxetic foams, 2000, Smart structures and materials, Hyde, Tupper (Ed), pp 336–343, 6-8 March 2000, Newport Beach, CA.Google Scholar
27 Scarpa, F., Burriesci, G., Smith, F.C. and Chambers, B. Comportamento meccanico e dielettrico di strutture a nido d'ape auxetiche, 2001, XXX AIAS conference, pp 621–630, 11-15 September 2001, Alghero, Italy.Google Scholar
28 Ferguson, N.S. and Clarkson, B.L. The modal density of honeycomb shells, ASMEJ Vib Acoustics, 1986, 108, pp 399–404.Google Scholar