Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:21:10.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new look at parachute opening dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Peter R. Payne
Peter R. Payne*
Affiliation:
Payne Inc.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is some evidence to indicate that injuries associated with parachute opening shock are much less frequent than injuries associated with the acceleration loads imposed by ejection seats, even though the stresses presumed to be induced in the human body may often be of the same order. Since all such data is based on operational experience, the details are necessarily vague, and it is hard to draw firm conclusions.

The Aeromedical Research Laboratory, USAF, as part of its studies of aircrew injury, decided to see whether there was any difference between the dynamics of parachute opening when used with a rigid anthropometric dummy of the type normally used to obtain opening shock data, and a human parachutist whose body is naturally more resilient.

Information

Type
Technical notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 77 , Issue 746 , February 1973, pp. 85 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Karman, Von, Theodore. Note on analysis of the opening shock of parachutes at various altitudes. AAF Scientific Advisory Group, Wright Field, Ohio. (Date unknown.)Google Scholar
2. O'Hara, F. Notes on the opening behaviour and the opening forces of parachutes. Journal of the Royal Aeronautcal Society. October 1948.Google Scholar
3. Topping, A. D., Marketos, J. D. and Costakos, N. C. A study of canopy shapes and stresses for parachutes in steady descent. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation, Akron, Ohio. WADC Technical Report 55-294. October 1955.Google Scholar
4. Personnel of USAF Parachute Branch Equipment Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio. United States Air Force Parachute Handbook. WADC Technical Report 55-265, ASTIA Document No AD 118036. December 1956.Google Scholar
5. Wilcox, Bruce. The calculation of filling time and tran sient loads for a parachute canopy during deployment and opening. Sandia Corporation SC-4151(TR). February 1958.Google Scholar
6. Freeman, Henry F. and Rosenberg, Cwo I. High alti tude and high airspeed tests of standard parachute canopies. 6511th Test Group (Parachute), US NAAS, El Centro, California. AFFTC TR 58-32. October 1958.Google Scholar
7. Heinrich, H. G., et al. Theoretical parachute investigations. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, WADC Contract No AF 33 (616)-8310, Progress Report No 17. 1st March to 31st May 1961.Google Scholar
8. Heinrich, H. G., et al. Theoretical parachute investigations. Department of Aeronautics and Engineering Mechanics, ASD Contract No AF 33 (616)-8310, Pro gress Report No 21. 1st March to 31st May 1962.Google Scholar
9. USAF Flight Dynamics Laboratory, AFSC, WPAFB, Ohio. Performance of and design criteria for deployable aerodynamic decelerators, ASD-TR-61-579. December 1963.Google Scholar
10. Heinrich, H. G. and Jamison, L. R. Jr. Parachute stress analysis during inflation and at steady state. University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, AIAA Entry Technology Conference, Williamsburg, Va. 12th-14th October 1964.Google Scholar
11. Melzig, H. D., et al. Parachute canopies during inflation —final reiport. Institut Fur Flugmechanik, Braunschweig, Germany, AD 631777. September 1965.Google Scholar
12. Ibrahim, S. K. Potential flowfield and added mass of the idealised hemispherical parachute. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 4, No 2. March-April 1967.Google Scholar
13. Jamison, Lelan R. A method for calculating parachute opening forces for general deployment conditions. Journal of Spacecraft, Vol 4, No 4. April 1967.Google Scholar
14. Asfour, K. J. Analysis of dynamic stress in an inflating parachute. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 4, No 5. September-October 1967.Google Scholar
15. Heinrich, H. G. Opening time of parachutes under in finite-mass conditions. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 6, No 3. May-June 1969.Google Scholar
16. French, K. E. Initial phase of parachute inflation. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 6, No 4. July-August 1969.Google Scholar
17. Improved C-9 canopies. 16mm film produced by US Air Force. 1957.Google Scholar
18. Sir Horace, Lamb. Hydrodynamics. Article 91a, Dover Publications, New York. 1945.Google Scholar
19. Weinig, F. S. On the dynamics of the opening shock of a parachute. Office of Air Research, Technical Report No 6. USAF Air Material Command, WPAFB. February 1951.Google Scholar
20. Foote, J. R. and Giever, J. B. Study of parachute opening, phase 1. WADC Technical Report 56-253. September 1956.Google Scholar