Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:19:17.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the aerodynamics of the Miles M.52 (E.24/43) – a historical perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

B. J. Brinkworth
B. J. Brinkworth*
Affiliation:
Hants, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The aerodynamic design of the Miles M.52 experimental supersonic aircraft is reviewed relative to the state of knowledge at its time of 1943 – 1946. Drawing on widely-ranging material, much not previously published, this study enlarges upon, and in places amends, previous accounts of the project.

Based on advice collated from the fields of aerodynamics and ballistics, Miles conceived an original and forward-looking design, backed by an extensive test programme. Novel solutions to new requirements in the areas of structures and systems provided a robust airframe, showing fair prospects of being stable and controllable throughout the specified flight envelope. An equally innovative power plant was devised for it by Whittle’s company, Power Jets Ltd.

Contradictory predictions of its performance were made by Miles and the RAE, through differences in their estimations of fuselage drag. A new evaluation suggests that the available information would have shown the aircraft to be capable of providing vital aerodynamic data for the transonic and early supersonic regimes at a time when no other sources were available, though further engine development would be needed for it to reach its full potential.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1153 , March 2010, pp. 125 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

References

1. Wood, D., Project Cancelled, 1975, Macdonald & Janes, London.Google Scholar
2. The supply of military aircraft, 1955, White Paper, Cmd 9388, HMSO, London, UK.Google Scholar
3. Kershaw, T., Jet Pioneers: Gloster and the Birth of the Jet Age, 2004, Sutton Publishing, Stroud, UK.Google Scholar
4. Grierson, J., Jet Flight, 1946, Sampson Low, Marston & Co Ltd, London, UK.Google Scholar
5. Brinkworth, B.J., On the aerodynamics of the Gloster E28/39 – a historical perspective, Aeronaut J, 2008, 112, pp 307–326 Google Scholar
6. Lock, C.N.H., Problems of high speed flight as affected by compressibility, Aeronaut J, 1938, 42, pp 193–228.Google Scholar
7. Research on aircraft flying at supersonic speeds, 1943-1945, AVIA15/1908, continued in Athodyd propulsion for aircraft flying at supersonic speeds 15/1909, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
8. Hall, A.A. and Constant, H., Note on the development of the additional power from aircraft by jet reaction, May 1940, RAE Report BA1604, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
9. Staff of Engine Dept. A brief discussion of the use and performance of propulsive ducts, June 1943, RAE Tech Note Eng 159, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
10. Relf, E.F., Some simple considerations relating to flight at supersonic speeds, 28 May 1943, Ae2242, Aero Sub-Cttee, ARC, AIR 62/800, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
11. Durand, W.F. (Ed). Aerodynamic Theory, Vol III, 1935, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
12. Smelt, R., Fougère, C.M. and Howell, A.R., Note on supersonic flight, June 1943, RAE Tech Note Aero 1216, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
13. Golley, J., Genesis of the Jet, 1996, Airlife Publications, Marlborough, UK.Google Scholar
14. Brown, D.L., Miles Aircraft since 1925, 1970, Putnam, London, UK.Google Scholar
15. Temple, J.C., Wings over Woodley, 1987, Aston Publications.Google Scholar
16. Serby, J.E., Morgan, M.B. and Cooper, E.R., Flight test on the profile drag of 14% and 25% thick wings, 1937, ARC R&M 1826.Google Scholar
17. Staff of Aerodynamics Dept, RAE. Flight and model rests of the ‘Hawcon’ with wings 30% thick at the root, 1939, ARC R&M 1937.Google Scholar
18. Cohen, J. and S/L Fraser, H.P., light tests of a Falcon fitted with an Irving flap, 1938, ARC R&M 1863.Google Scholar
19. Hills, R., Brown, E.C., Morrison, M.A. and Becker, H.V., Wind-tunnel test on the experimental high lift M.18, 1942, ARC R&M 2453.Google Scholar
20. Brown, D.L., Visit to Messrs Power Jets Ltd, Rugby, 5 November, 1942 and Memorandum on visit to Power Jets Ltd, Rugby, 16 June 1943, Pratt, J., private communication.Google Scholar
21. Miscellaneous papers relating to visits of and telephone calls with Miles Aircraft Ltd (formerly Phillips and Powis), September/October 1943, Power Jets Ltd, AIR 62/804, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
22. Bancroft, D.S., The Miles M.52 supersonic aircraft, Space Chronicle, J Brit Interplanetary Soc, 2002, 55, Suppl 2, pp 77–85 Google Scholar
23. Whittle, F., Jet – the Story of a Pioneer, 1953, Frederick Mueller, London, UK.Google Scholar
24. Miles E24-43 with large wing, January 1944. AIR 30/1628, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
25. Some notes on the firm’s activities during the war, October 1947, for inclusion in MAP Scientific War Records, Miles Aircraft Ltd, AVIA 44/603, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
26. Cowley, W.L., 1927 Schneider Trophy Contest (Intro), January 1931, Collected Reports on British High Speed Aircraft. ARC R&M 1300.Google Scholar
27. Diehl, W.S., Engineering Aerodynamics, Revised edition, 1936, The Ronald Press Co, New York, USA.Google Scholar
28. Warner, E.P., Airplane Design – Performance, Second edition, 1936, McGraw-Hill, London, UK.Google Scholar
29. Wilkins, E.W.C., Airplane Design, 1938, Charles Griffin, London, UK.Google Scholar
30. Piercy, N.A.V., Aerodynamics, 1937, EUP Ltd, London, UK.Google Scholar
31. Ackroyd, J.A.D., The United Kingdom’s contributions to the development of aeronautics, Part 4. The origins of the jet age, Aeronaut J, 2003, 107, pp 1–47.Google Scholar
32. Reed, S.A., Air reactions to objects moving at rates above the velocity of sound, with applications to the air propeller, 1922, NACA Tech Memo 168.Google Scholar
33. Briggs, L.J. and Dryden, H.L., Aerodynamic characteristics of twenty-four airfoils at high speed, 1929, NACA Rep 319.Google Scholar
34. Briggs, L.J. and Dryden, H.L., Aerodynamic characteristics of circular-arc airfoils at high speed, 1930, NACA Rep 365.Google Scholar
35. Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, The characteristics of the aerofoil RAF 31a at high speeds, 1927, ARC R&M 1086.Google Scholar
36. Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, The characteristics of a bi-convex aerofoil at high speeds, 1927, ARC R&M 1091.Google Scholar
37 Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, The characteristics of bi-convex No2 aerofoil at high speeds, 1927, ARC R&M 1123.Google Scholar
38. Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, The characteristics of a conventional airscrew section, aerofoil R&M 322 No3 at high speeds, 1927, ARC R&M 1124.Google Scholar
39. Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, The characteristics of airscrew section R&M 322 No4 at high speeds, 1927, ARC R&M 1134.Google Scholar
40. Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, Some experiments upon an airscrew of conventional blade section, aerofoil R&M 322 No. 3 at high speed, 1928, ARC R&M 1174.Google Scholar
41. Douglas, G.P. and Perring, W.G.A., Wind tunnel tests with high tip speed airscrews, Some experiments upon an airscrew of conventional blade. section, 0 082c thick, and of RAF 27 and RAF 28 sections, 1928, ARC R&M 1198.Google Scholar
42. Glauert, H., The effect of compressibility on the lift of an aerofoil, 1927, ARC R&M 1135.Google Scholar
43. Anderson, J.D., A History of Aerodynamics and its Impact on Flying Machines, 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
44. Thom, A., Blockage corrections and choking in a high-speed tunnel, 1943, ARC R&M 2033.Google Scholar
45. Mair, W.A. (Ed). Research on high speed aerodynamics at the Royal Aircraft Establishment from 1942 to 1945, 1950, ARC R&M 2222.Google Scholar
46. Ferri, A. (trans Vanier, J.). Investigations and experiments in the Guidonia supersonic wind tunnel, July 1939, NACA Tech Memo 901.Google Scholar
47. Smelt, R., Proposed programme of work on drag of aerofoils near the speed of sound, by measurement on falling bodies, March 1944, RAE Tech Note Aero 1410, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
48. Hallion, R., Supersonic Flight, 1972, Collier-Macmillan Ltd, London, UK.Google Scholar
49. Tallboy: ballistic trials, May 1944, Orfordness Research Station Rep BT61, AVIA6/13312, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
50. Howarth, L., Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, Vol 2, High Speed Flow, 1953, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
51. Hilton, W.F., British aeronautical research facilities, Aeronaut J, 1960, Centenary edition, 70, pp 103–107.Google Scholar
52. Pritchard, J.L., The dawn of aerodynamics, Aeronaut J, 1957, 61, pp 149–180.Google Scholar
53. Hunt, F.R.W., The reaction of the air to artillery projectiles, The Mechanical Properties of Fluids, 2nd Edition, 1936, Blackie & Son, London.Google Scholar
54. Stanton, T.E., The development of a high speed wind channel for research in external ballistics, 1931, Proc Royal Society London, Ser A, 131, pp 122–132.Google Scholar
55. Taylor, G.I. and Maccoll, J.W., The air pressure on a cone moving at high speed, 1933, Proc Royal Society London, Ser A, 139, pp 278–311.Google Scholar
56. Maccoll, J.W., The conical shock wave formed by a cone moving at high speed, 1937, Proc Royal Society London, Ser A, 143, pp 459–472.Google Scholar
57. Von Kármán, T.H. and Moore, N.B., Resistance of slender bodies moving with supersonic velocities, with special reference to projectiles, Trans ASME, J Appl Mechs, 1932, 54, pp 303–310.Google Scholar
58. Tsien, H.S., Supersonic flow over an inclined body of revolution, Aeronaut J, 1938, 5, pp 480–483.Google Scholar
59. Ballistic Tables 1940, Cmd 726, War Office, UK, WO279/166, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
60. Lighthill, M.J., Supersonic flow past bodies of revolution, 1945, ARC R&M 2003.Google Scholar
61. Nelson, W.C. (Ed), Selected Topics on Ballistics, 1959, Pergamon Press for AGARD.Google Scholar
62. Stanton, T.E., A high speed wind channel for tests on aerofoils, 1928, ARC R&M 1130.Google Scholar
63. Taylor, G.I., Applications to aeronautics of Ackeret’s Theory of aerofoils moving at speeds greater than that of sound, 1932, ARC R&M 1487.Google Scholar
64. Hooker, S.G., The pressure distribution and forces on thin aerofoil sections having sharp leading edges, and moving with speeds greater than that of sound, 1936, ARC R&M 1721.Google Scholar
65. Relf, E.F., Some simple considerations relating to flight at supersonic speeds, ARC Current Paper Ae2242, AIR62/801, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
66. Ferri, A., Experimental research in the Guidonia Supersonic Wind Tunnel, Aeronaut J, 1939, 43, pp 803–832.Google Scholar
67. Ferri, A., The Guidonia High Speed Tunnel, A description of the Italian wind tunnel built for super-sonic research. Aircraft Engineering, 1940, 12, pp 302–305.Google Scholar
68. Ferri, A. (trans Flint, M). Some experimental results obtained on wing profiles in the Guidonia Supersonic Wind Tunnel, November 1940, Current Paper FM476, ARC (MAP Trans 1115), DSIR 23/10617, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
69. Cheshire, L.J., Note on visit to Dr J.W. Maccoll, Armament Research Dept, Sevenoaks, 30 December 1943, AIR62/815, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
70. M.52 Construction, The Miles Aircraft Collection, undated, Amos, P., private communication.Google Scholar
71. Davidson, I.M. and Umney, L.E., On the preliminary tests of an annular intake at supersonic speed, 1943, NGTE Memo M4, AVIA28/13198, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
72. Miles Aircraft Company – M-52 Project, July 1946, US Military Attache London Report No R-2420-46, Pratt, J., private communication.Google Scholar
73. Bancroft, D.S., The Miles E.24/43 cabin stability and velocity distribution above pilot’s emergency exit, Miles Aircraft Ltd report WT52/4, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
74. Marshall, W.S.D., Model tests in the Blower Tunnel on the emergency escape of a pilot from a high speed aircraft (Miles E.24/43) and hood jettisoning tests, November 1945, RAE Tech Note Aero 1727, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
75. Bancroft, D.S., The Miles E. 24/43 take-off and landing performance, Miles Aircraft Ltd Report PE.52/2, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
76. Bancroft, D.S., The Miles E.24/43, September 1945, Miles Aircraft Ltd report 52/0, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
77. Sturtivant, R., British Research and Development Aircraft, 1990, Foulis/Haynes Publishing Group.Google Scholar
78. The Miles Supersonic, The Aeroplane 13 September 1946, 71, (1843), pp 295–296.Google Scholar
79. Brown, E., Miles M.52 – The supersonic dream, Air Enthusiast, August/November 1980, pp 35–42.Google Scholar
80. Bancroft, D.S., Wind tunnel tests on a biconvex wing with 25% plain flap, Miles Aircraft Ltd report WT52/3, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
81. Levacic, I., Marshall, W.S.D. and Young, A.D., No.2 11 1/2 foot wind tunnel tests on a ¼ scale model wing of the Miles E 24/43 aircraft, June 1945, RAE Report Aero 2044, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
82. Marshall, W.S.D., Levacic, I. and Young, A.D., No.2 11 1/2 foot wind tunnel tests of a high lift supersonic wing, May 1945, RAE Report Aero 2045, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
83. Schmitz, F.W. (trans Flint, M.). Aerodynamik des Flugmodels, 1942, Air Min RTP Trans 2460.Google Scholar
84. Bancroft, D.S., Flight tests of the Falcon with biconvex wings, Part I, Miles Aircraft Ltd report M.A.3/1, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
85. Bancroft, D.S., E.24/43. Clothed wing, (1), Miles Aircraft Ltd report WT.52/6 undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
86. Marshall, W.S.D, Levacic, I., Young, A.D. and Powter, G.J., Low-speed wind tunnel tests of a high lift supersonic wing, 1946, ARC R&M2365 (comprising RAE Reports Aero 2045, May 1945, Aero 2157, Dec 1946 and Addendum to Aero 2157, March 1947).Google Scholar
87. Winter, K.G. and Morgan, M.B., Wind tunnel tests on the Miles E24/43, July 1944, Part I, RAE Report Aero 1959, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
88. Hutton, S.P. and Gamble, H.E., High speed wind tunnel tests on an aircraft designed for supersonic speeds (Miles E24/43), July 1945, RAE Report Aero 2057, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
89. Bancroft, D.S., Preliminary wind tunnel tests on the Miles E.24/43, August 1945, Miles Aircraft Ltd Report WT.52/1, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
90. Hilton, W.F. and Pruden, F.W., Subsonic and supersonic high speed tunnel tests of a faired double wedge aerofoil, 1943, ARC R&M 2057.Google Scholar
91. Lighthill, M.J., The conditions behind the trailing edge of the supersonic aerofoil, 1944, ARC R&M 1930.Google Scholar
92. Lighthill, M.J., The supersonic theory of wings of finite span, 1944, ARC R&M 2001.Google Scholar
93. Bancroft, D.S., Wind tunnel rests of a biconvex tailplane and elevator, Miles Aircraft Ltd Report WT.52/2, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
94. Bancroft, D.S., Flight tests of the Falcon with biconvex wings, Part II, Biconvex tailplane and elevator, Miles Aircraft Ltd Report M.A.3/1a, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
95. Bancroft, D.S., Flight tests of the Falcon with biconvex wings, Part III, (all-moving biconvex tailplane), Miles Aircraft Ltd Report M.A.3/1b, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
96. Kleckner, H.F., Preliminary flight research on an all-movable horizontal tail as a longitudinal control for flight at high Mach numbers, March 1945, NACA Report L5CO8.Google Scholar
97. Mitchell, K., Thorpe, A.W. and Frayn, E.M., A theoretical investigation of the response of a high-speed aeroplane to the application of ailerons and rudder, May 1945, ARC R&M 2294.Google Scholar
98. Collar, A.R., Theoretical forces and moments on a thin aerofoil with hinged flap at supersonic speeds, 1943, ARC R&M 2004.Google Scholar
99. McDonnell, P., Beaten to the barrier, Aero Monthly, January 1998, pp 20–25.Google Scholar
100. Smelt, R., Note on longitudinal stability and trim changes at speeds near the speed of sound, February 1944, RAE Report Aero 1911, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
101. Burnet, C., Three Centuries to Concorde, 1979, Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd, London, UK.Google Scholar
102. Collar, A.R., Resistance derivatives of flutter theory, Part II: Results for supersonic speeds, 1944, ARC R&M 2139.Google Scholar
103. Temple, G. and Jahn, H.A., Flutter at supersonic speeds : derivative coefficients for a thin aerofoil at zero incidence, 1945, ARC R&M2140.Google Scholar
104. Aircraft: Design and Development: Bombers (Code 6/2), Miles fighter-bomber jet propulsion aircraft to specification E.24/43: development policy, AVIA15/1968, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
105. Bancroft, D.S., Definitive list of M.52 models to various scales, March 2000, Amos, P., private communication.Google Scholar
106. Fougère, C.M. and Smelt, R., Note on the Miles supersonic aircraft (preliminary version), December 1943, RAE Tech Note Aero1347, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
107. Hodge, J., Comments on Minutes of 8th Meeting of Supersonic Flight Committee, 14 December 1943, January 1944, AIR62/813, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
108. Fougère, C.M., Further note on the Miles supersonic aircraft, July 1944, RAE Tech Note Aero 1470, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
109. Bancroft, D.S., The Miles E.24/43, fitted with W2/700 and No.4 Augmenter, Estimated performance, March 1946, Miles Aircraft Ltd, report PE.52/1, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
110. Smelt, R., Experimental supersonic aircraft employing rocket propulsion, February 1945, RAE Report Aero 2016, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
111. Nonweiler, T., The design of a supersonic aircraft utilising the German HWK-509 A-1 bi-fuel rocket unit, June 1945, RAE Tech Note Aero 1655, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
112. Brotherton, J., Further consideration of an experimental supersonic aircraft, June 1945, RAE Tech Note Aero 1648, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
113. Hilton, W., Subsonic and supersonic tests on a 7½% bi-convex aerofoil, May 1944, ARC R&M 2196.Google Scholar
114. Thom, A.W., Smith, F. and Brotherton, J., Flight tests at high Mach number on E28/39 W4041 (single-engined jet-propelled aircraft), October 1945, ARC R&M 2264.Google Scholar
115. Cheshire, L.J., Visit of Dr Maccoll, Dr Hayworth, and Mr Illingworth of the Armament Research Depot; and Mr Capley and Mr Bancroft of Miles Aircraft Ltd, 19 June 1944, 16-6-44, Power Jets Ltd, AIR62/821, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
116. Some notes on compressibility effects in relation to the design of high speed aircraft, 9 February 1945, Miles Aircraft Ltd, AVIA15/2233, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
117. Moss, G.M., Leeming, D.W. and Farrar, C.L., Military Ballistics, 1995, Brassey’s, London, UK.Google Scholar
118. Place, E.L. and Smith, A.G., Note on the estimation of head drag of nacelles at supersonic velocities, 28 June 1944, Aerodynamics Test Report No. 106, Power Jets Ltd, AIR62/823 National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
119. Hodge, J., Estimated performance of W2/700 with No.4 design augmenter in M.52, January 1944, Report A.122, Power Jets Ltd, AVIA28/2970, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
120. Millikan, C.B., Draft Technical Report of Visit, British M.A.P. Project E24/43 Miles 52 Transonic Research Airplane, June 1946, Clark Millikan papers, Box 6, File 6.2, NavTechMisEu, California Institute of Technology.Pratt, J., private communication.Google Scholar
121. Benecke, T. and Quick, A.W. (Ed). History of German guided missiles development, AGARDograph, 1957, 20, Verlag E. Appelhans, Brunswick, Germany.Google Scholar
122. Nonweiler, T., German high-speed aircraft and guided missiles, Part 1 – aircraft, August 1945, RAE Report Aero 2070, AVIA 6/9900, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
123. The 8-346 supersonic research aircraft, A.I.2(g) Report 2382, AIR 40/142, National Archives, Kew, UK.Google Scholar
124. Smelt, R., Notes on discussion with the staff of Focke-Wulf Ltd, May 1945, RAE Tech Note Aero 1644, FAST Museum, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
125. Staff of Supersonics Division, Flight Section, Flight trials of a rocketpropelled transonic research model: the RAE-Vickers Rocket Model, March 1950, ARC R&M 2835.Google Scholar
126. Bancroft, D.S., Note on the practicability of wing section and plan forms etc, for various flight speeds, Miles Aircraft Ltd Report no 52/1, undated, Bancroft, D.S., private communication.Google Scholar
127. Bowman, M.W., The Lockheed F-104 Starfighter, 2000, Crowood Press Ltd, Marlborough, UK.Google Scholar