Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:05:58.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance characterisation of MPD thrusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

T. R. Nada
T. R. Nada*
Affiliation:
National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences Cairo, Egypt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper introduces a characterisation of the performance indices and operating limits of the self field magnetoplasmadynamic thruster. The thrust, specific impulse, and efficiency are considered as the main performance indices, while the operating limits are the cathode lifetime, onset phenomenon, and the overfed state of the thruster. The effects of thruster parameters (current, mass flow rate, geometry, and propellant type) on the performance indices and operating limits are examined using one-dimensional model of cylindrical self-field thrusters. Design charts are presented to help the designers to choose the optimum and safe set of the thruster parameters that realise certain mission requirements.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1121 , July 2007, pp. 443 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

References

1. Winter, M.W., Nada, T.R., Auweter-Kurtz, M., Haag, D. and Fertig, M., Investigation of nozzle geometry effects on the onset of plasma instabilities in high power steady state MPD thrusters, July 2006, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, California, AIAA 2006-5016.Google Scholar
2. Lapoint, M.R., High power MPD thruster performance measurements, September 2004, NASA TM-2004-213226.Google Scholar
3. Fruchtman, A., Limits on the efficiency of several electric thruster configurations, Physics of Plasma May 2003, 10, (5).Google Scholar
4. Subramaniam, V.V. and Lawless, J.L., Onset in magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters with finite-rate ionization, J Propulsion and Power, 1988, 4, (6).Google Scholar
5. Lawless, J.L. and Subramaniam, V.V., Theory of onset in magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters, J Propulsion and Power, 1987, 3, (2), pp 121–127.Google Scholar
6. Sovey, J.S. and Mantenieks, M.A., Performance and lifetime assessment of magnetoplasmadynamic arc thruster technology, J Propul and Power, January-February 1991, 7, (1), pp 71–83.Google Scholar
7. Myers, R.M., Suzuki, N., Kelly, A.J. and Jahn, R.G., Cathode phenomena in low power magnetoplasmadynamic thruster, J Propul and Power, 1991, 7, (51), pp 760–766.Google Scholar
8. Auweter-Kurtz, M. et al. Cathode phenomena in plasma thrusters, J Propul and Power, November-December 1993, 9, (6), pp 882–888.Google Scholar
9. Choueiri, E., Scaling of thrust in self-field magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters, J Propul and Power, 1998, 14, (5), pp 744–753.Google Scholar
10. Toki, K., Optimal control of quasi-one-dimensional self-field magneto plasma dynamic arcjet flowfields, J Propul and Power, 1997, 13, (1).Google Scholar
11. Sankaran, K., Choueiri, E., and Jardin, S.C., Comparison of simulated magnetoplasmadynamic thruster flowfields to experimental measurements, J Propul and Power, 2005, 21, (1), pp 129–138.Google Scholar
12. Heiermann, J. and Auweter-Kurtz, M., Numerical and experimental investigation of the current distribution in self-field magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters, J Propul and Power, 2005, 21, (1), pp 119–128.Google Scholar
13. Jahn, R.G., Physics of Electric Propulsion, 1968, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
14. Burton, R.L., Clark, K.E. and Jahn, R.G., Measured performance of a multi-megawatt MPD thruster, 1983, J Spacecraft, 20, (3), pp 299–304.Google Scholar
15. Choueiri, E.Y. and Ziemer, J.K., Quasi-steady magnetoplasmadynamic thruster performance database, J Propul and Power, 2001, 17, (5), pp 967–976.Google Scholar
16. Lapoint, M.R., Strzempkowski, E. and Pencil, E., High power MPD thruster performance measurements, NASA TM-2004-213226.Google Scholar
17. Kuriki, K., Kunii, Y. and Shimizu, Y., Idealized model for plasma acceleration in an MHD channel, AIAA J, 1983, 21, (3), pp 322–326.Google Scholar
18. Tikhonov, V.B., Semenihin, S.A., Alexandrov, V.A., Dyakonov, G.A. and Popov, G.A., Research on plasma acceleration processes in self-field and applied field thrusters, 23rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC Paper 93-076.Google Scholar
19. Lapointe, M.R., Numerical simulation of cylindrical, self-field MPD thrusters with multiple propellants, 1994, NASA Contractor Report 194458.Google Scholar
20. Domonkos, M.T. et al, Preliminary pulsed MPD thruster performance, June 1995, 31st Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-95-2674.Google Scholar
21. Kurtz, H., Auweter-Kurtz, M. and Schrade, H.O., Self-field MPD thruster design-experimental and theoretical investigations, September 1985, AIAA Paper 85-2002.Google Scholar
22. Polk, J.E., Jaskowsky, W., Kelly, A.J. and Jahn, R.G., Measurement of MPD thruster erosion using surface layer activation, J Propulsion and Power, January-February 1987, 3, (1), pp 33–38.Google Scholar
23. Uematsu, K., Morimoto, S. and Kuriki, K., MPD thruster performance with various propellants, J Spacecraft, 1985, 22, (4), pp 412–416.Google Scholar
24. Lapoint, M.R. and Mikellides, P.G., High power MPD thruster development at the NASA Glenn Research Center, August 2001, NASA CR-2001-211114.Google Scholar
25. Myers, R., Kelly, A.J. and Jahn, R.G., Electro thermal-electromagnetic hybrid thruster research, AIAA paper 87-1018.Google Scholar
26. Wood, N.J., Osborne, J.J., Roberts, G.T. and Gabriel, S.B., Characterization of a low-power steady-state magnetoplasmadynamic device for non-propulsive applications, Plasma Sources Sci Technology, 1997, 6, pp 484–491.Google Scholar
27. Lapoint, M., Numerical simulation of geometric scale effects in cylindrical self-field MPD thrusters, July 1999, NASA CR-1892242.Google Scholar
28. King, D.Q., Magnetoplasmadynamic Channel Flow for Design of Coaxial MPD Thrusters, June 198, PhD dissertation, Princeton University2.Google Scholar