Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:46:37.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rear body influence on base pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Indushekher Das and
J. N. Mishra
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Little information is available on the behaviour of the base pressure on a body of revolution having a following body in its wake. A preliminary investigation for the case of axisymmetric rear body has been reported by Mishra and Chatterjee. Their experiments were conducted on a 20° included-angle blunt cone. Mishra and Das reported an investigation for the case of asymmetric rear bodies having the same diameter. These investigations indicate significant rear body effects on the base pressure.

In multistage rockets, the flow characteristics of upper stages could be seriously affected by the proximity of a lower stage after they separate from one another.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 84 , Issue 832 , May 1980, pp. 168 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

00

The Authors: (L) Professor I. S. Das, MSc Eng, (R.) Professor J. N. Mishra, BSc Eng, ME, PhD, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India.

References

1. Mishra, J. N. and Chatterjee, A. K. Following body effects on base pressure in supersonic stream. Journal of Spacecrafts & Rockets, Vol 12, p 317, May 1975.Google Scholar
2. Mishra, J. N. and Das, Indushekher. Influence of rear body eccentricity on supersonic base pressure. AIAA Journal, Vol 16, pp 166–168, February 1978.Google Scholar
3. Browand, F. K., Carter, J. E. and Mclaughlin, D. K. Wake measurements behind cone suspended magnetically in a Mach number 4-3 stream. AGARD Conference Proc No 19, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Wu, J. J. and Behrens, W. An experimental study of hypersonic wakes behind wedges at angle of attack. AIAA Journal, Vol 10, December 1972, pp 1582–1589.Google Scholar
5. Merchxat, J. An experimental study of the near wake of a slender cone at varying incidence at M∞=7. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 63, Part 1, March 1974, pp 195–208.Google Scholar
6. Chapman, D. R. An analysis of base pressure at supersonic velocities and comparison with experiment. NACA Tech Note 2137, 1950.Google Scholar
7. Reid, J. and Hastings, R. CExperiments on the axi- symmetric flow over afterbodies and bases at M=2·0. Royal Aircraft Establishment, Rept Aero 2628, October 1959.Google Scholar
8. Kavanau, L. L. Results of some base pressure experiments at Intermediate Reynolds number with M=2·84. Journal of The Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 21, No 4, pp 257–260, April 1954.Google Scholar
9. Sivier, K. R. and Bogdonoff, S. M. The effect of support interference on the base pressure of a body of revolution at high Reynolds number. Princeton University Department of Aeronautical Eng, Rept 332, AFOSR Tech Note 55-301, October 1955.Google Scholar
10. Perkins, E. W. Experimental investigation of the effects of support interference on the drag of bodies of revolution at a Mach number of 1·5. NACA Tech Note 2292, 1951.Google Scholar