Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:24:58.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Runway foreign object detection using RGB

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

W. Chen
W. Chen*
Affiliation:
Airport Research Institute, China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology, Beijing, China
*
wishchen@buaa.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper presents an improved algorithm for foreign object debris (FOD) detection on the runway with several innovative techniques. The detection scheme incorporates four steps of geometric adjustment, background subtraction, clutter suppression and camouflage elimination. After geometric adjustment, the background model is built for each pixel with a set of RGB colour values taken in the past at the same location or in the neighborhood in the step of background subtraction. The background model samples are substituted randomly with an unfixed update period. Furthermore, the steps of clutter suppression and camouflage elimination are added to modify the segmentation map after background subtraction in order to increase the detection probability and decrease the false alarm rate. The overall algorithm is applied to the test data and real data on the runway. The results show that the RGB-based algorithm performs better than the classical gray-based techniques.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1212 , February 2015 , pp. 229 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

References

1. NAS-412: Foreign Object Damage/Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Prevention. Aerospace Industries Association – National Aerospace Standard, 1 October 1997.Google Scholar
2.Patterson, J. Jr. Foreign Object Debris (FOD) detection research. International Airport Review, 2008, 11, (2), pp 22–27.Google Scholar
3.O’donnell, M.J. Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Detection Equipment. FAA, AC No: 150/5220-24, 2009.Google Scholar
4.Yu, L. and Gang, X.Study and design on FOD detection and surveillance system for airport runway, Laser & Infrared, 2011, 41, (8), pp 909–915.Google Scholar
5.Manjie, F.Airport FOD detection research on runway. Beijing Jiaotong University, China, 2011.Google Scholar
6.Qunyu, X., Huansheng, N., and Weishi, C. Video-based foreign object debris detection. IEEE International Workshop on Imaging Systems and Techniques Proceedings, pp 123–126, 11-12 May, 2009.Google Scholar
7.Beasley, P.D.L., Binns, G. and Hodges, R.D., et al. Tarsier®, a millimeter wave radar for airport runway debris detection. Radar Conference, 2004, pp 261–264.Google Scholar
8.Vogel, B.An object lesson in fnding FOD. Jane’s Airport Review, 2008, 20, (8), pp 56–57.Google Scholar
9.Radke, R.J., Andra, S. and Al-Kofahi, O., et alImage change detection algorithm: a systematic survey. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005, 14, (3), pp 294–307.Google Scholar
10Barnich, O. and Van Droogenbroeck, M.ViBe: A Universal Background Subtraction Algorithm for Video Sequences. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 2011, 20, (6), pp 1709–1724.Google Scholar
11McHugh, J., Konrad, J. and Saligrama, V.et alForeground-Adaptive Background Subtraction. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2009, 16, (5), pp 390–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar