Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T01:46:50.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation of automatic helicopter deck landings using nature inspired flight control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

M. Voskuijl,
G. D. Padfield,
D. J. Walker,
B. J Manimala and
A. W. Gubbels
M. Voskuijl
Affiliation:
M.Voskuijl@tudelft.nl, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
G. D. Padfield
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
D. J. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
B. J Manimala
Affiliation:
AgustaWestland (UK), Yeovil, UK
A. W. Gubbels
Affiliation:
Institute for Aerospace Research (IAR), National Research Council (NRC), Ottawa, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Research studies have indicated that the optical flow parameter, time to close tau, is the basis of purposeful control in the animal world, and used by both fixed wing and helicopter pilots during manoeuvring. This parameter is defined as the instantaneous time to close a gap (spatial or force) at the current closing rate. A novel automatic flight control strategy has been developed that makes use of optical flow theory and in particular, the parameter tau. This strategy has been applied to two distinct problems; (1) the landing of a helicopter on a ship and (2) the lateral repositioning of a helicopter. The first is a challenging case because the landing of a helicopter on a ship is one of the most dangerous of all helicopter flight operations. Furthermore, helicopters are often subject to torque oscillations during rapid collective control, which increases pilot workload significantly when operating with low power margins and/or whilst performing tasks that require accurate heave control. The second case demonstrates the generality of the technique. Both automatic manoeuvres were simulated successfully within desired limits, with the novel control strategy creating a ‘natural’, smooth, tau motion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1151 , January 2010, pp. 25 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

References

1. Jump, M. and Padfield, G.D., Investigation of the flare maneuver using optical tau, AIAA J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29, (5), pp 1189–1200.Google Scholar
2. Padfield, G.D., Clark, G. and Taghizad, A., How long do pilots look forward? Prospective visual guidance in terrain hugging flight, J American Helicopter Soc, 2007, 52, (2), pp 134–145.Google Scholar
3. Padfield, G. D., Lee, D.N. and Bradley, R., How do pilots know when to stop, turn or pull-up? (Developing guidelines for visual aids), J American Helicopter Society, 2003, 48, (2), pp 108–119.Google Scholar
4. Du Val, R.W., A real-time multi-body dynamics architecture for rotor-craft simulation, 2001, Proceedings of RAeS conference ‘The Challenge of Realistic Rotorcraft Simulation’, 7-8 November 2001, London, UK.Google Scholar
5. Ellis, D.K. and Gubbels, A.W., Preliminary investigation of methods to improve Bell 412 torque dynamics, 2001, National Research Council of Canada, LTR-FR-172.Google Scholar
6. Padfield, G.D. and Wilkinson, C.H., Handling Qualities Criteria for Maritime Helicopter Operations, 1997, Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2, pp 1425–1440.Google Scholar
7. Padfield, G.D., The making of helicopter flying qualities: A requirements perspective, Aeronaut J, 1998, 102, (1018), pp 409–437.Google Scholar
8. Lee, D., Horn, J., Sezer-Uzol, N. and Long, L., 2003, Simulation of pilot control activity during helicopter shipboard operations. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibition, Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
9. Lee, D. and Horn, J., 2005, Optimization of a helicopter stability augmentation system for operation in a ship airwake, Proceedings of the 61st Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, 2, pp 1149–1159.Google Scholar
10. Gibson, J.J., 1998, Original work published in 1958, Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals, Ecological Psychology, 10, (3–4), pp 161–176.Google Scholar
11. Lee, D. N., 1998, Guiding movement by coupling taus, Ecological Psychology, 10, (3-4), pp 221–250.Google Scholar
12. Rieser, J.J., Lockman, J.J. and Nelson, C.A. (Eds), (2005) Perception and Cognition in Learning and Development, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
13. Manimala, B. J., Walker, D.J., Padfield, G.D., Voskuijl, M. and Gubbels, A.W., 2007, Rotorcraft simulation modelling and validation for control law design. Aeronaut J, 111, (1116), pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
14. Padfield, G.D., Helicopter Flight Dynamics, Second edition, 2007, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
15. Peters, D.A. and He, C.J., Finite state induced flow models Part II, three dimensional rotor disc, J Aircraft, 1995, 32, (2), pp 323–333.Google Scholar
16. Noonan, K.W., Aerodynamic characteristics of two rotorcraft airfoils designed for application to inboard region of a main rotor blade, July 1990, NASA TP-3009.Google Scholar
17. Bailey, F.J., A simplified theoretical method of determining the characteristics of a lifting rotor in forward flight, 1947, NACA Report 716.Google Scholar
18. Harris, F.D., Kocurek, J.D., McLarty, T.T. and Trept, T.J., Helicopter performance methodology at Bell Helicopter Textron, 1979, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
19. Biggers, J.C., McCloud, J.L. and Patterakis, P., Wind-tunnel tests of two full scale helicopter fuselages, 1962, NASA TN D-1548.Google Scholar
20. Wilson, J.C. and Mineck, R.E., Wind-tunnel investigation of helicopter rotor-wake effects on three helicopter fuselage models, 1975, NASA TM X-3185.Google Scholar
21. Hui, K., Advanced Modelling of the engine torque characteristics of a Bell 412HP Helicopter, 1999, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibition, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
22. Howlett, J.J., UH-60A Black Hawk Engineering Simulation Program: Vol 1 — Mathematical Model, 1981, NASA contractor report 166309.Google Scholar
23. Padfield, G.D. and White, M.D., Flight simulation in academia; HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation, Aeronaut J, September 2003, 107, (1075).Google Scholar
24. Walker, D.J., Voskuijl, M., Manimala, B.J. and Gubbels, A.W., Nonlinear attitude control laws for the Bell 412 helicopter, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2008, 31, (1), pp 44–52.Google Scholar
25. McFarlane, D. and Glover, K., A loop-shaping design procedure using H∞ synthesis, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37, (6), pp 759–769.Google Scholar
26. Voskuijl, M., Rotorcraft Flight Control for Improved Handling, Loads Reduction and Envelope Protection, 2007, PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
27. Ferrier, B. and Duncan, J., UAV all weather autonomous ship board operations, 2007, AHS International Specialists’ Meeting — Unmanned Rotorcraft: Design, Control and Testing, Chandler, AZ, USA.Google Scholar
28. ADS-33E-PRF Aeronautical Design Standard Performance Specification, Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft, 2000, United States Army Aviation and Missile Command Engineering Directorate, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, USA.Google Scholar