Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:47:57.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unmanned aviation traffic forecast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

L. R. Newcome
L. R. Newcome*
Affiliation:
Modern Technology Solutions, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

“Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.”

Niels Bohr

The pace at which new technologies are assimilated into society is driven by trends in the regulatory, budgetary, and societal environments in addition to the pace of technology development itself. This study merges trends in these areas to develop an integrated forecast of the levels to which unmanned aviation can be expected to emerge in the military, air cargo, business, general aviation, and airline aviation segments over the coming 40 years. One out of every 80 aircraft on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan over the US are anticipated in this forecast to be unmanned by 2025 and two out of nine (18 of every 80) by 2050. Portions of this study were originally researched in 2005 in support of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) for planning the Next Generation (NextGen) air traffic system and later presented at the 23rd Bristol UAV Systems Conference.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1145 , July 2009, pp. 459 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

References

1. Crabtree, P., Discovering the Future, The Futurist, May-June, 2008.Google Scholar
2. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, http://bluebrain.epfl.ch. 2009.Google Scholar
3. FAA-APO-00-5, FAA long-range aerospace forecasts fiscal years 2015, 2020, and 2025, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, June 2000.Google Scholar
4. Interim operational approval guidance 08-01, Unmanned aircraft Systems Operations in the U.S. National Airspace System, Federal Aviation Administration, AIR-160, 13 March 2008.Google Scholar
5. Unmanned Aircraft Operations in the National Airspace System (NAS), Federal Aviation Administration, AJR-36, Air Traffic Organisation Policy N JO 7110.495, 15 January 2009 (cancellation notice 7110.497 dated 14 January 2009).Google Scholar
6. Luczak, M., The power of remote control: US railroad experience strongly suggests that remote control locomotive technology is safe and efficient, Railway Age, February, 2005. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1215/is_2_206/ai_n13455603.Google Scholar
7. Moravec, H., Robot, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
8. Pain, E., Leading the Blue Brain project, Science, 6 October 2006, http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2006_10_06/leading_the_blue_brain_project/(parent)/68 Google Scholar
9. US Department of Defense, OSD unmanned systems roadmap, 2007-2032, 2008. Reference Appendix A.3 ‘UAS Airspace Integration,’ which is based on the OSD airspace integration plan for unmanned aerial vehicles, released in November 2004. http://www.acq.osd.mil/uas/docs/2007_Unmanned_Systems_Roadmap.pdf Google Scholar
10. US Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Final report: safety of remote control locomotive (RCL) operations, March, 2006. http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/05_007775finalreport_RCL.pdf Google Scholar