Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T00:42:22.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whirl flutter analysis of prop-rotors using unsteady aerodynamics reduced-order models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

M. Gennaretti and
L. Greco
M. Gennaretti
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
L. Greco
Affiliation:
INSEAN, Italian Ship Model Basin, Rome, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The prediction of this aeroelastic phenomenon is an urgent need of the designer and requires devoted numerical tools. This work examines the influence of the accuracy of the aerodynamic modelling on whirl flutter analysis, with particular attention to those models that can conveniently be applied to preliminary design and control purposes. Considering a simple pylon/prop-rotor structure, the aeroelastic instability boundaries are identified by 2D quasi-steady and 2D unsteady aerodynamics theories, along with a 3D unsteady, potential flow BEM solver. A methodology for deriving reduced-order models from unsteady aerodynamic solutions is used. The numerical investigation highlights that the accuracy of the aerodynamic solver included in the analysis may be of crucial importance. The use of 2D aerodynamic models does not always guarantee conservative stability predictions, and this is particularly true for three-bladed rotors where a fully 3D unsteady solver coupled with a wake alignment algorithm seems to be necessary.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 112 , Issue 1131 , May 2008, pp. 261 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2008 

References

1. Reed, W.H. and Bland, S.R., An analytical treatment of aircraft propeller procession instability, 1961, NASA TN D-659.Google Scholar
2. Houbolt, J.C. and Reed, W.H., Propeller-nacelle whirl flutter, J Aerospace Sci, 1962, 29, (3), pp 333–346.Google Scholar
3. Reed, W.H., Propeller-rotor whirl flutter: a state-of-the-art review, J Sound and Vibration, 1966, 4, (3), pp 526–544.Google Scholar
4. Singh, B. and Chopra, I., Whirl flutter stability of two-bladed proprotor/pylon systems in high speed flight, J American Helicopter Soc, 2003, 48, (2), pp 99–107.Google Scholar
5. Hathaway, E.L. and Gandhi, F.S., Modeling refinements in simple tiltrotor whirl flutter analyses, J American Helicopter Soc, 2003, 48, (3), pp 186–198.Google Scholar
6. Kunz, D.L., Analysis of proprotor whirl flutter: Review and Update, J Aircr, 2005, 42, (1), pp 172–178.Google Scholar
7. Gennaretti, M. and Greco, L., A time-dependent coefficient reduced-order model for unsteady aerodynamics of proprotors, J Aircr, 2005, 42, (1), pp 138–147.Google Scholar
8. Peters, D.A., Karunamoorthy, S. and Cao, W., Finite state induced flow models Part I: two dimensional thin airfoil, J Aircr, 1995, 32, (2), pp 313–322.Google Scholar
9. Peters, D.A. and He, C.J., Finite state induced flow models Part II: three dimensional rotor disk, J Aircr, 1995, 32, (2), pp 323–333.Google Scholar
10. Theodorsen, T., General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, NACA Report 496, 1935.Google Scholar
11. Morino, L. and Gennaretti, M., Boundary integral equation methods for aerodynamics, Computational nonlinear mechanics in aerospace engineering, Atluri, S.N. (Ed), Aeronautics & Astronautics AIAA Series, 1992, 146, pp 279–320.Google Scholar
12. Johnson, W., Dynamics of tilting proprotor aircraft in cruise flight, 1974, NASA TN D-7677.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, W., Helicopter Theory, 1980, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
14. Loewy, R.G., A two-dimensional approximation of unsteady aerodynamics of rotary wings, J Aeronautical Sci, 1957, 24, (2), pp 81–93.Google Scholar