Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:05:39.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feature modeling based on design catalogues for principle conceptual design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Feng Peien,
Xu Guorong and
Zhang Mingjun
Feng Peien
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou P.R., China
Xu Guorong
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou P.R., China
Zhang Mingjun
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou P.R., China
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The research on new types of design knowledge bases and conceptual solution catalogues is an advanced subject of design methodology. Using the separate function as an example, this paper establishes design catalogues for principle conceptual design to realize the function, and proposes a general computer-oriented action principle design process. Upon studying the relationship of knowledge in the process, this paper represents functions of action principles in function feature models and provides computer-oriented feature models for action principle design.

Keywords

Action PrincipleDesign CatalogueFeature ModelFunction Feature ModelPrinciple Conceptual Design

Information

Type
Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 10 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Representing functionality in design , September 1996, pp. 347 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Horvath, I. (1991). Theory and methodology for conceptual design based on expert system paradigm. ICED'91, 1059–1064.Google Scholar
Koller, R. (1990). Methodology of mechanical design, (Chinese ed.) Scientific Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Koller, R., & Kastrup, N. (1994). Prinziplosungen zur konstruktion technischer produkte. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering design. The Design Council, London.Google Scholar
Peien, F., & Jing, L. (1992). Expert system. Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Peien, F., & Mingjun, Z. (1993). The research on development of design catalogues for conceptual design. Proc. 3rd Nat. Conf. Eng. Design, pp. 101–104. Industrial Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Roth, K. (1981). Foundation of methodical procedures in design. Design Studies 2(2), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, K. (1982). konstruieren mit konstruklion-katalogen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, G., & Jianzhong, Z. (1995). The research on basic theories of concurrent design. Comput. Aided Design and Manufac. 12, 5–10.Google Scholar
Zhao, F., & Maher, M.L. (1992). Using network-based prototype to support creative design by analogy and mutation. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '92, (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 773–793. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar