Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:21:35.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comment concerning “Testing Flotation Recovery Rates”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael W. Pendleton
Michael W. Pendleton*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since carbonized seed species differ in buoyancy characteristics, and since certain conditions may cause carbonized seeds to become nonbuoyant, the use of both buoyant and nonbuoyant modern carbonized seed species as a recovery standard is suggested in order to provide a more representative measure of flotation device effectiveness. Recovery standards utilizing modern carbonized seeds should be viewed as probable, rather than absolute, determinations of flotation device recovery efficiency because the effectiveness of flotation systems can be significantly altered by subtle changes in technique.

Information

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 1983, pp. 615 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

French, D. H. 1971 An Experiment in Water-sieving. Anatolian Studies 21:59–64.Google Scholar
Minnis, Paul, and Blanc, Steven Le 1976 An Efficient, Inexpensive Arid Lands Flotation System. American Antiquity 41:491–493.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Michael W. 1979a A Comparison of Two Flotation Methods. Bulletin of the Philadelphia Anthropological Society 31:1–8.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Michael W. 1979b Flotation Methodology. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, Cincinnati. Google Scholar
Pendleton, Michael W. 1980 A Comparison of Two Flotation Methods. Master's thesis, California State University, Chico. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Michael W. 1982 The Use of Flotation Recovery Standards. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Symposium of the Southwestern Federation of Archeological Societies, Midland, Texas. Google Scholar
Renfrew, Jane M. 1973 Palaeoethnobotany: The Prehistoric Food Plants of the Near East and Europe. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schock, Jack M. 1971 Indoor Water Flotation: A Technique for the Recovery of Archaeological Materials. Plains Anthropologist 16:228-231.Google Scholar
Wagner, Gail E. 1982 Testing Flotation Recovery Rates. American Antiquity 47:127–132.Google Scholar
William, David 1973 Flotation at Siraf. Antiquity 47:288–292.Google Scholar
Yarnell, Richard A. 1963 Comments on Struever's Discussion of an Early “Eastern Agricultural Complex.” American Antiquity 28:547-548.Google Scholar