Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T14:26:33.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comment on Curren's “Potential Interpretations of ‘Stone Gorget’ Function”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Starna
William A. Starna*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York College, Oneonta, NY 13820
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Curren (1977) presents an interesting and provocative hypothesis regarding the “potential” function of “stone gorgets.” Nevertheless, there are some serious problems with his thesis that require comment.

Initially, there is a danger in the rather simplistic association drawn between form and function. To claim a functional similarity because there is a morphological similarity between stone gorgets and contemporary ceramic tools called “ribs” is a risky procedure. One does not need to go very far to demonstrate analogous examples. For instance, if I were to show a surveyor a stone “plummet,” I would most likely elicit the response, “ a surveyor’s plummet in stone?” If I were to present an unsuspecting archaeologist with a surveyor’s plummet, I might hear, “plummets (net sinkers or bolas] in brass?” In contrast to the paper under disucssion, Ahler’s (1971) important study is a sophisticated treatment of the problems involved in equating form with function.

Information

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1979, pp. 337 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Ahler, Stanley A. 1971 Projectile point form and function at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Missouri Archaeological Society Research Series 8.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James A. 1971 Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. American Antiquity Memoir 25.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. 1952 The archaeology of eastern Georgia and South Carolina. In Archaeology of eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 312–321. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Chapman, Carl H. 1952 Culture sequence in the lower Missouri Valley. In Archaeology of eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 139–151. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Wilbur M. 1948 A study of the Glacial Kame culture in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana. Occasional Contributions fromthe Museum of Anthropology of the University of Michigan 12. Google Scholar
Curren, Cailup B. 1977 Potential interpretations of “stone gorget” function. American Antiquity 42:97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dejarnette, David L. 1952 Alabama archaeology: a summary. In Archaeology of eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 272–284. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Deuel, Thome 1952 Hopewellian dress in Illinois. In Archaeology of eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 165–175. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fischer, David H. 1970 Historians’ fallacies. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Fitting, James E. 1965 Late Woodland cultures of southeastern Michigan. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers 24.Google Scholar
Fitting, James E. (Editor) 1972 The Schultz site at Green Point. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Memoirs 4.Google Scholar
Fitting, James E., and Brose, David S. 1970 The northern periphery of Adena. In Adena: the seeking of an identity, edited by Swartz, B. K. Jr. , pp. 29–55. Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.Google Scholar
Ford T., Latimer Jr. 1976 Adena sites on Chesapeake Bay. Archaeology of Eastern North America 4:63–89.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. (editor) 1952 Archaeology of eastern United States. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Holland, C. G. 1970 An archaeological survey of southwest Virginia. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Herbert C. 1976 The Rosenkrans site, an Adena-related mortuary complex in the upper Delaware Valley, New Jersey. Archaeology of Eastern North America 4:9–50.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. M. N., and Kneberg, M. 1959 The Archaic culture in the middle south. American Antiquity 25:161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1969 The archaeology of New York state. Natural History Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rolingson, Martha Ann, and Schwartz, Douglas W. 1966 Late paleo-lndian and early Archaic manifestations in western Kentucky. University of Kentucky Studies in Anthropology 3.Google Scholar
Streuver, S., and Houart, G. L. 1972 An analysis of the Hopewell interaction sphere. In Social exchange and interaction, edited by Wilmsen, Edwin N., pp. 47–79. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers 46.Google Scholar
Swartz, B. K. Jr. (editor) 1970 Adena: the seeking of an identity. Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ronald A. 1976 A re-evaluation of the St. Jones River site. Archaeology of Eastern North America 4:89–110.Google Scholar
Wauchope, Robert 1966 Archaeological survey of northern Georgia. American Antiquity Memoirs 21.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1949 Archaeology of the Florida Gulf coast. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 113.Google Scholar
Witthoft, John 1953 Broad spearpoints and the transitional period cultures. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 23(1):4–31.Google Scholar
Wray, D. E. 1952 Archaeology of the Illinois Valley: 1950. In Archaeology of eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 152–164. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wright, Gary A. 1974 Archaeology and trade. Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology 49. Google Scholar