Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T23:35:56.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fragile-Pattern Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Julian D. Hayden
Julian D. Hayden*
Affiliation:
Tucson, Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A fragile-pattern area is defined as any archaeological area in which man's material remains lie without depth upon an existing natural surface and thus comprise a pattern which is disturbed or broken by any form of selective artifact collecting. Such surfaces as desert pavements, degraded lake terraces, dunes, and trails are described, and it is shown why the first surveyor to visit a site should collect all available materials and information rather than sample them in the traditional manner. Suggestions are made for surveying areas that have already been damaged by collectors.

Information

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 31 , Issue 2Part1 , October 1965 , pp. 272 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Campbell, E. W. C. and Campbell, W. H. 1937 The Archeology of Pleistocene Lake Mohave: A Symposium. Southwest Museum Papers, No. 12. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Ezell, Paul H. 1954 Northwestern Papagueria, Archeology and Ethnology. The Kiva, Vol. 19, Nos. 2–4, pp. 18–19. Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Malcolm J. 1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 3. San Diego.Google Scholar
Rogers, Malcolm J. 1945 An Outline of Yuman Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 180–90. Albuquerque.Google Scholar