Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:24:53.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Variation in Occupation Span into Settlement-Pattern Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Dewar
Robert E. Dewar*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, U-176, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Settlement patterns recovered by archaeologists differ fundamentally from synchronic settlement patterns analyzed by geographers since they are a static record of occupations that may often have had differing periods of use in the past. Many maps of the “settlement pattern” of prehistoric phases show more occupations than were ever simultaneously occupied. After discussing some of the problems this can cause, I describe a way of characterizing past settlement dynamics and a method for estimating (1) the mean number of likely simultaneous occupations for a region and (2) phase-to-phase differences in mean occupation span. The method is illustrated by the analysis of settlement data from the Ixtapalapa region in the Basin of Mexico.

Résumé

Résumé

Los patrones de asentamiento recuperados por arqueólogos difieren fundamentalmente de los patrones de asentamiento sincrónicos analizados por geógrafos, ya que aquellos son registros estáticos de ocupaciones que frecuentemente pudieron haber tenido diferentes períodos de uso en el pasado. Muchos mapas del “patrón de asentamiento” de fases prehistóricas muestran mayor cantidad de asentamientos que los que fueron simultáneamente ocupados en momento alguno. Tras discutir algunos de los problemas que esta situácion puede ocasionar, describo una forma de caracterizar las dinámicas de asentamiento del pasado y un método para estimar: (1) el promedio de probables ocupaciones simultáneas para una región y (2) las diferencias entre fases en cuanto a intervalos medios de ocupación. El método es ilustrado mediante el análisis de datos de asentamiento provenientes de la región de Ixtapalapa en la cuenca de México.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 604 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Ammerman, A. J. 1981 Surveys and Archaeological Research. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 10 : 63–88.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1975 Sampling, Judgement, and the Archaeological Record. In Sampling in Archaeology, edited by Mueller, J. W., pp. 251–257. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. 1972a Prehispanic Adaptation in the Ixtapalapa Region, Mexico. Science 175 : 1317–1326.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. 1972b Prehistoric Settlement Patterns of the Ixtapalapa Peninsula Region, Mexico. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 6. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. 1973 The Culture-Ecology of Shifting (Pioneering) Cultivation Among the Yanomamo Indians. In Peoples and Cultures of Native South America, edited by Gross, D. R., pp. 126–44. Doubleday and Natural History Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dewar, R. E. 1986 Discovering Settlement Systems of the Past in New England. Man in the Northeast 31 : 77–88.Google Scholar
Dewar, R. E., and McBride, K. A. 1988 Remnant Settlement Patterns. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Gross, D. R. 1983 Village Movement in Relation to Resources in Amazonia. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, edited by Hames, R. B. and Vickers, W. T., pp. 432–449. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hames, R. B. 1983 The Settlement Pattern of a Yanomamo Population Bloc : A Behavioral Ecological Interpretation. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, edited by Hames, R. B. and Vickers, W. T., pp. 393–427. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. A., and LeBlanc, S. A. 1986 Short-Term Sedentism in the American Southwest : The Mimbres Valley Salado. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. R., Kintigh, K. W., and Gregg, S. A. 1983 Archaeological Settlement Pattern Data from the Chalco, Xochimilco, Ixtapalapa, Texcoco and Zumpango Regions, Mexico. Technical Reports No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1989 Monitoring Mississippian Homestead Occupation Span and Economy Using Ceramic Refuse. American Antiquity 54 : 288–310.Google Scholar
Plog, F. T. 1973 Diachronic Anthropology. In Research and Theory in Current Archaeology, edited by Redman, C. L., pp. 181–198. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Plog, F. T. 1974 The Study of Prehistoric Change. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rouse, I. 1972 Settlement Patterns in Archaeology. In Man, Settlement and Urbanism, edited by Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R. and Dimbleby, G. W., pp. 95–107. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., Parsons, J. R., and Santley, R. S. 1979 The Basin of Mexico : Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schacht, R. M. 1984 The Contemporaneity Problem. American Antiquity 49 : 678–695.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1975 The Effect of Occupation Span on Site Content. In The Cache River Archaeological Project : An Experiment in Contract Archaeology, assembled by Schiffer, M. B. and House, J. H., pp. 265–269. Research Series No. 8. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Stanislawski, M. B. 1973 Ethnoarchaeology and Settlement Archaeology. Ethnohistory 20 : 375–392.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, P. 1975 Settlement and Population Trends in the Basin of Mexico (Ixtapaluca and Zacatenco Phases). Journal of Field Archaeology 2 : 331–349.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, P., and Fish, S. K. 1975 Surface and Subsurface Evidence for Community Size at Coapexco, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 2 : 97–104.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. 1977 Periodization, Population, and Early State Formation in Khuzistan. In Mountains and Lowlands : Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia, edited by Levine, L. D. and Young, T. C. Jr., pp. 347–370. Undena Publications, Malibu, California. Google Scholar