Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T14:16:09.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanization of Artifact Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William J. Folan,
John H. Rick and
Walter Zacharchuk
William J. Folan
Affiliation:
Canadian Historic Sites Division, Ottawa, Canada
John H. Rick
Affiliation:
Canadian Historic Sites Division, Ottawa, Canada
Walter Zacharchuk
Affiliation:
Canadian Historic Sites Division, Ottawa, Canada
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increased costs of processing artifacts can be substantially reduced by the use of labor-saving devices in the laboratory. A standard washing machine has been modified for washing historic-period artifacts with minimal breakage. Forty-five man-hours of hand washing can be accomplished in one hour by machine, with comparable standards of cleanliness. The numbering of artifacts, using rubber stamps, can represent time savings of 80 per cent on certain classes of material. Use of a sandblaster for cleaning iron artifacts triples the output of the conventional electrolytic treatment. A ceramic pantograph and a modified diagraph show promise of reducing the time required to draw pottery sections.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1968, pp. 86 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brainerd, George W. 1958 The Archaeological Ceramics of Yucatán. Anthropological Records, Vol. 19. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Foley, Vincent P. 1965 Another Method for the Treatment of Ferrous Artifacts. The Florida Anthropologist, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 65–8. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Foley, Vincent P. 1967 Suggested Design and Construction for Small Laboratory Electrolysis Apparatus. The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers 1965–1966, Vol. 1, pp. 100–10. Wilmington, North Carolina.Google Scholar
March, Benjamin 1934 Standards of Pottery Description. Occasional Contributions from the Museum of Anthropology of the University of Michigan, No. 3. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
South, Stanley A. 1962 A Method of Cleaning Iron Artifacts. Newsletter of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 17–18. Cambridge.Google Scholar