Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:33:39.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Boyd and Schroedl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Marvin Smith
Affiliation:
Garrow & Associates, Inc., 4000 Dekalb Technology Parkway, Suite 375, Atlanta, GA 30340
David Hally
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Richard Polhemus
Affiliation:
Frank McClung Museum, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916
Chester DePratter
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

Abstract

C. Clifford Boyd, Jr. and Gerald F. Schroedl find fault with our use of both historical and archaeological evidence in our reconstruction of the paramount chiefdom of Coosa. Herein we answer their criticisms by discussing our overall research strategy and by clarifying our use of historical documents, the Spanish league, and archaeological information. We also point out some of the more obvious errors and misinterpretations in the work of the U.S. De Soto Expedition Commission.

Information

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable