Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T21:33:58.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sandy Lake Ware and Its Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Leland R. Cooper and
Elden Johnson
Leland R. Cooper
Affiliation:
Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota
Elden Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A newly defined pottery named the Sandy Lake ware is described. This ware extends from northwestern Wisconsin westward across east-central Minnesota into the extreme Mississippi River headwaters region. It is associated with Clam River focus pottery in Wisconsin and in Minnesota. It has a beginning association with Blackduck focus pottery but has a temporal duration beyond Blackduck to the latest prehistoric and perhaps protohistoric period.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 1964, pp. 474 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Evans, G. E. 1961 A Reappraisal of the Blackduck Focus. Unpublished M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. (Editor) 1952 Archeology of Eastern United States. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Macneish, Richard S. 1958 An Introduction to the Archaeology of Southeast Manitoba. National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 157. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Quimby, George I. 1961 Indian Life in the Upper Great Lakes: 11,000 B.C. to A.D. 1800. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wilford, Lloyd A. 1945 The Prehistoric Indians of Minnesota: The Headwaters Lakes Aspect. Minnesota History, Vol. 26, No. 4. St. Paul.Google Scholar