Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T07:51:02.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. Basic Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Wayne Coy
Wayne Coy
Affiliation:
The Washington Post
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Federal Executive Reorganization Re-Examined: A Symposium, I
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , December 1946, pp. 1124 - 1137
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Senate Report No. 1011, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., Mar. 4, 1946. The La Follette Committee benefited greatly from the earlier report entitled The Reorganization of Congress prepared by the Committee on Congress of the American Political Science Association (Washington, 1945). For an incisive appraisal of these and related documents, see Harris, Joseph P., “The Reorganization of Congress,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 6 (1946), pp. 267 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 “Teamwork in Washington,” Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 169 (Apr., 1942), p. 400.

3 Art. 2, sec. 3.

4 Executive Order No. 8248 of Sept. 8, 1939.

5 See Marx, Fritz Morstein, “The Bureau of the Budget; Its Evolution and Present Rôle,” in this Review, Vol. 39 (1945), pp. 653 ff., 869 ff.Google Scholar

6 For substantiating observations, see Appleby, Paul H., “Organizing Around the Head of a Large Federal Department,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 6 (1946), pp. 207 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.