Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:57:25.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Daniel Treisman
Daniel Treisman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do political and fiscal decentralization make it easier or harder to control inflation? Statistical analysis of average annual inflation rates in a panel of 87 countries in the 1970s and 1980s found no clear relationship between decentralization and the level of inflation. Political decentralization, however, does appear to reduce change in countries' relative inflation rates over time. By creating additional veto players, federal structure may “lock in” existing patterns of monetary policy—whether inflationary or strict. Among the (mostly developed) countries that started with low inflation, inflation tended to increase more slowly in federations than in unitary states. Among the (mostly developing) countries that started with high inflation, inflation tended to increase faster in the federations. There is evidence that political decentralization locks in a country's degree of practical central bank independence—whether high or low—and the relative hardness or softness of budget constraints on subnational governments.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 4 , December 2000, pp. 837 - 857
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza, and Easterly, William. 1997. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Harvard University. Typescript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Drazen, Allan. 1991. “Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?” American Economic Review 81 (5): 1170–88.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Hausmann, Ricardo, Hommes, Rudolf, and Stein, Ernesto. 1996. “Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America.” NBER Working Paper No. W5586. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1993. “Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25 (05): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Summer): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 1994. “Cross-National Time Series Data Archive.” Binghamton, NY: Center for Social Analysis, SUNY Binghamton.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (05): 407–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., and Gordon, David B.. 1983. “Rules, Discretion, and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12 (07): 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Richard M. 1993. “Threading the Fiscal Labyrinth: Some Issues in Fiscal Decentralization.” National Tax Journal 46 (06): 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1950. “Federalism and Fiscal Equity.” American Economic Review 40 (4): 583–99.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tim, Peterson, George, and Brakarz, Jose. 1991. “Decentralization to Local Government in LAC: National Strategies and Local Response in Planning, Spending, and Management.” Report No. 5, Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Department, Regional Studies Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex. 1992. Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Edwards, Sebastian, and Tabellini, Guido. 1992. “Seignorage and Political Instability.” American Economic Review 82 (06): 537–56.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, and Webb, Steven B.. 1995. “Political Influence on the Central Bank: International Evidence.” World Bank Economic Review 9 (3): 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Webb, Steven B., and Neyapti, Bilin. 1992. “Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes.” World Bank Economic Review 6 (3): 353–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoodi, Hamid, and Zou, Heng-fu. 1998. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study.” Journal of Urban Economics 43 (2): 244–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demery, David, and Demery, Lionel. 1992. Adjustment and Equity in Malaysia. Paris: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asl, and Levine, Ross. 1995. “Stock Market Development and Financial Intermediaries: Stylized Facts.” Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Dillinger, William. 1994. “Decentralization and Its Implications for Urban Service Delivery.” Urban Management and Municipal Finance Discussion Paper No. 16. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillinger, William, and Webb, Steven B.. 1998. “Fiscal Management in Federal Democracies: Argentina and Brazil.” Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Directorate General of the Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Republic of China. 1998. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of China 1998. Taipei: Directorate General of the Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the ROC.Google Scholar
Easterly, William, and Levine, Ross. 1997. “Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (11): 1203–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Tabellini, Guido. 1991. “Explaining Fiscal Policies and Inflation in Developing Countries.” Journal of International Money and Finance 10 (03): 16–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1995. “From Statism to Federalism: A Paradigm Shift.” Publius 25 (Spring): 5–18.Google Scholar
Fornasari, Francesca, Webb, Steven B., and Zou, Heng-Fu. 1998. “Decentralized Spending and Central Government Deficits: International Evidence.” Washington, DC: World Bank. Typescript.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. 1998. “The Positive Political Economy of Public Debt: An Empirical Examination of the OECD Post-War Experience.” University of Michigan. Typescript.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. 1999. “Partially Independent Central Banks, Politically Responsive Governments, and Inflation.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (07): 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fundacion de Investigaciones Economices Latinoamericanas. 1993. Hacia una Nueva Organizacion del Federalismo Fiscal en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: FIEL.Google Scholar
Garman, Christopher, Haggard, Stephan, and Willis, Eliza. 1996. “Decentralization in Latin America.” University of California, San Diego. Typescript.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barabara. 1995. “Challenging the Conventional Wisdom.” In Economic Reform and Democracy, ed. Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 59–73.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Atish R., Gulde, Anne-Marie, Ostry, Jonathan D., and Wolf, Holger C.. 1995. “Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?” IMF Working Paper No. 95/121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giavazzi, Francesco, and Pagano, Marco. 1988. “The Advantage of Tying One's Hands: EMS Discipline and Central Bank Credibility.” European Economic Review 32 (5): 1055–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grilli, Vittorio, Masciandaro, Donato, and Tabellini, Guido. 1991. “Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries.” Economic Policy 13 (10): 342–92.Google Scholar
Gunnemark, Erik V. 1991. Countries, Peoples and Their Languages: The Linguistic Handbook. Gothenburg, Sweden: Lanstryckeriet.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert, eds. 1992. The Politics of Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yasheng. 1996. Inflation and Investment Controls in China: The Political Economy of Central-Local Relations in the Reform Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy: 1983–1995.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 259–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn E., and Prescott, Edward C.. 1977. “Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans.” Journal of Political Economy 85 (3): 437–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Ross, and Zervos, Sara. 1996. Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1998. “Federalism and Central Bank Independence: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–92.” World Politics 50 (3): 401–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. [1788] 1961. “Federalist No. 46.” In The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Ronald I. 1997. “Market-Preserving Fiscal Federalism in the American Monetary Union.” In Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance, ed. Blejer, Mario I. and Ter-Minassian, Teresa. New York: Routledge. Pp. 73–93.Google Scholar
Moser, Peter. 1997. “Checks and Balances, and the Supply of Central Bank Independence.” University of St. Gallen. Typescript.Google Scholar
Nickson, R. Andrew. 1995. Local Government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1996. “Russia's Party System: Is Russian Federalism Viable?” Post-Soviet Affairs 12 (3): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (11): 1163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Adam S. 1995. “Declarations Are Not Enough: Financial Sector Sources of Central Bank Independence.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1995. Pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
Prud'homme, Remy. 1995. “On the Dangers of Decentralization.” World Bank Research Observer 10 (2): 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Yingyi, and Roland, Gérard. 1998. “Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint.” American Economic Review 88 (12): 1143–62.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Romer, David. 1993. “Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (11): 869–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubini, Nouriel, and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1989. “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrialized Countries.” Economic Policy 8 (Spring): 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Anwar. 1991. The New Fiscal Federalism in Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Shah, Anwar. 1994. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Shibata, Tokue, ed. 1993. Japan's Public Sector. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Sivard, Ruth L. 1993. World Military and Social Expenditures 1993. Washington, DC: World Priorities.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. 1977. “The Politics of Economic Stabilization in Postwar Latin America.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, ed. Malloy, James M.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Pp. 149–90.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (11): 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 1995. “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects.” In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, DC: World Bank. Pp. 295–316.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (10): 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835–1840] 1988. Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J. P.. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1996. “Fiscal Politics and the Fate of Post-Communist Federations: Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, Czecho-slovakia—and Russia.” Paper presented at the 1996 annual meeting of the APSA, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1999. “Political Decentralization and Economic Reform: A Game Theoretic Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 488–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (07): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93 (09): 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. N.d. “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis.” Governance. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hagen, Jurgen, and Harden, Ian. 1996. “Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline.” IMF Working Paper WP/96/78. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (06): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Johnsen, Christopher. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 642–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildasin, David. 1996. “Comment on ‘Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects’ by Vito Tanzi.” In The Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995, ed. Bruno, Michael and Pleskovic, Boris. Washington, DC: World Bank. Pp. 323–8.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1992. World Tables. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Report: The State in a Changing World. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2000. World Development Report: Entering the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.