Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:30:56.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Security and Value Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ronald Inglehart and
Paul R. Abramson
Ronald Inglehart
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Paul R. Abramson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Confirming Inglehart's prediction (1971) of an intergenerational shift toward postmaterialist values, a time series analysis controlling for the joint effects of inflation and unemployment demonstrates that there is a statistically significant trend toward postmaterialism in all eight West European countries for which data are available over the past two decades. Evidence from the 1981–83 and 1990–91 World Values Surveys indicates that this value shift occurs in any society that has experienced sufficient economic growth in recent decades so that the preadult experiences of younger birth cohorts were significantly more secure than those of older cohorts. Large intergenerational differences tend to be found in societies that have experienced rapid growth in gross national product per capita, and are negligible in societies that have had little or no growth. Accordingly, postmaterialism increased in 18 of the 20 societies on five continents for which we have comparable data over the past decade.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , June 1994, pp. 336 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald. 1986. “Generational Replacement and Value Change in Six West European Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 30:1–25.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald, 1987. “Generational Replacement and the Future of Post-Materialist Values.” Journal of Politics 49:231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald, 1992. “Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 22:183–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald. 1993. “The Structure of Values on Five Continents.” Michigan State University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Inglehart, Ronald. N.d. “Education, Security, and Postmaterialism.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bennulf, Martin, and Holmberg, Soren. 1990. “The Green Breakthrough in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 13(2): 165–84.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans-Georg. 1990. “Value Change in Postmaterialist Politics: The Case of West Germany.” Comparative Political Studies 23:239–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böltken, Ferdinand, and Jagodzinski, Wolfgang. 1985. “In an Environment of Insecurity: Postmaterialism in the European Community, 1970 to 1980.” Comparative Political Studies 17:453–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatfleld, Christopher. 1989. The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Dutt, Nitish. 1991. “Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment.” American Political Science Review 85:905–20.Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus. 1990. “The Impact of Party Polarization and Postmaterialism on Voter Turnout—a Comparative Study of 16 Industrial Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 18:183–205.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1991. “The Dynamics of Party System Change.” In Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opinion, ed. Reif, Karlheinz and Inglehart, Ronald. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen, eds. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Graaf, Nan Dirk. 1988. Postmaterialism and the Stratification Process. Utrecht: Interdisplinair Sociaal Wetenschappelijk Onderzoeksinstitut.Google Scholar
Diez-Nicolas, Juan. N.D. “Postmaterialismo y Desarollo Economico.” Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Taylor, Michaeli A.. 1993. “Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition.” American Journal of Political Science 37:747–79.Google Scholar
Duncan, Otis Dudley. 1968. “Social Stratification and Mobility: Problems in the Measurement of a Trend.” In Indicators of Social Change, ed. Sheldon, Eleanor B. and Moore, Wilbert E.. New York: Sage, 1968.Google Scholar
Ganzeboom, Harry B. G., and Flap, Henk, eds. 1989. New Social Movements and Value Change: Theoretical Developments and Empirical Analyses. Amsterdam: SISWO.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Duch, Raymond M.. 1994. “Postmaterialism and the Emerging Soviet Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 47:5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Norval D. 1977. Cohort Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Martinot, Vincent. 1991. “Gruene and Verts: Two Faces of European Ecologism.” West European Politics 14(4): 70–95.Google Scholar
Huber, John. 1989. “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology.” European Journal of Political Research 17:599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Herbert H. 1972. Secondary Analysis of Sample Surveys: Principles, Procedures, and Potentialities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65:991–1017.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1981. “Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity.” American Political Science Review 75:880–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1985. “Aggregate Stability and Individual-level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox.” American Political Science Review 79:97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1987. “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 81:1289–1303.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. “Economic Development, Cultural Change, and Democratization: A Global Perspective.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Abramson, Paul R.. 1992. “Value Change in Advanced Industrial Societies: Problems in Conceptualization and Measurement.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Abramson, Paul R.. 1993. “Values and Value Change on Five Continents.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Hellemans, Staf. 1990. “The Left-Right Semantics and the New Politics Cleavage.” Comparative Political Studies 23:210–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, P. Bert. 1990. “Linking the ‘Old’ and ‘New’: Movement Networks in the Netherlands.” In Challenging the Political Order, ed. Dalton, Russell J. and Kuechler, Manfred. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989. “New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology 94(5): 1078–1116.Google Scholar
Lafferry, William M., and Knutson, Oddbjørn. 1985. “Postmaterialism in a Social Democratic State: An Analysis of the Distinctness and Congruity of the Inglehart Value Syndrome in Norway.” Comparative Political Studies 17:411–30.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Exp. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 1990. Neokonservatismus und Neue Rechte in den USA. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, ed. 1990. New Politics in Western Europe: The Rise and the Success of Green Parties and Alternative Lists. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1990. “Reflections on the Institutional Self-Transformation of Movement Politics: A Tentative Stage Model.” In Challenging the Political Order, ed. Dalton, Russell J. and Kuechler, Manfred. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr.,, 1990. Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques. 2d ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1990. “The Roots of Public Opinion toward New Social Movements: An Empirical Test of Competing Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science 34:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1993. “Environmental Belief Systems in Western Europe: A Hierarchical Model of Constraint.” Comparative Political Studies 26:3–29.Google Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1991. Review of Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, by Ronald Inglehart. Journal of Politics 53:235–38.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques A., and van Deth, Jan. 1989. “How New Is Dutch Politics?” West European Politics 12:61–78.Google Scholar
van Deth, Jan W. 1983. “The Persistence of Materialist and Post-materialist Value Orientations.” European Journal of Political Research 11:63–79.Google Scholar
van Deth, Jan W. 1989. “Fighting a Trojan Horse: The Persistence and Change of Political Orientations.” In New Social Movements and Value Change, ed. Ganzeboom, Harry and Flap, Hendrik. Amsterdam: SISWO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.