Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:08:54.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General Deterrence between Enduring Rivals: Testing Three Competing Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Paul Huth
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Bruce Russett
Affiliation:
Yale University

Abstract

General deterrence, unlike immediate deterrence, has rarely been analyzed in a systematic comparative manner. We outline a research design for doing so, by studying the circumstances under which, in a set of enduring rivalries, challengers are likely to initiate militarized disputes. We indicate the conceptual and operational steps necessary to make and empirically compare predictions stemming from three often-competing theoretical frameworks: rational deterrence, a general model of rational conflict initiation, and a cognitive psychological model of behavior emphasizing risk orientation and misperception. The results of probit analysis on a pooled time series of enduring rivalries since 1945 provide support for hypotheses from each of the different theoretical models.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.