Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:49:55.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Pragmatic Method for Evaluating Election Schemes through Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert F. Bordley
Robert F. Bordley*
Affiliation:
General Motors Research Labs
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article combines ideas from ethics, social choice, and political theory to develop a simulation method for assessing the desirability of different voting schemes in different situations. I use the method to evaluate six well-known election systems. My results are intuitive. I find that approval voting seems to be a good voting scheme for mass elections.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 1983, pp. 123 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achen, C. 1975. Mass political attitudes and the survey response. AmericanPolitical Science Review 69: 1218–31.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. 1975. Candidate support functions in the 1968 election: an empirical application of the spatial model. Public Choice 22:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D. 1958. The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, A. 1975. Justice: John Rawls vs. the tradition of political philosophy. American Political Science Review 69:648–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, B. 1972. Toward an estimate of the frequency of occurrence of the paradox ofvoting in U.S. Senate roll call votes. In Probability models of collective decision making, eds. Niemi, R. and Weisberg, H.. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.Google Scholar
Brams, S. J., and Fishburn, P.C. 1978. Approval voting. American Political Science Review 72: 831–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C., and Tullock, G. 1965. A measure of the importance of cyclical majorities. Economic Journal 75:853–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, J. R., and Cohen, M. D. 1978. Toward applicable social choice theory: a comparison of social choice functions under spatial model assumptions. American PoliticalScience Review 72:1341–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. W. 1975. Rawls' theory of justice. American Political Science Review 69:588–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. S. 1967. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility: comment. Journal of Political Economy 75:765–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1971. A comparative analysis of group decision methods. Behavioral Science 16:538–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1973. Voter concordance, simple majorities and group decision methods. Behavioral Science 18:364–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1974a. Simple voting systems and majority rule. Behavioral Science 19:166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1974b. Aspects of one-stage voting rules. Management Science Ser. B. 21:422–27.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1974c. Paradoxes of voting. American Political Science Review 68:537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1974d. Single-peaked preferences and probabilities of cyclical majorities. Behavioral Science 19: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. and Gehrlein, W. 1976. An analysis of simple two-stage voting systems. Behavioral Science 21: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. 1978. Strategic analysis of nonranked voting systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 21:1–12.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. and Brams, S. 1981. Expected utility and approval voting. Behavioral Science 26:136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. 1975. Justice and rationality: some objections to the central argument in Rawls' theory. American Political Science Review 69:615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. and Hamlen, M. 1968. The paradox of voting: probability calculations. Behavioral Science 13:306–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63:309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality: a critique of John Rawls' theory. American Political Science Review 69:594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klahr, D. 1966. A computer simulation of the paradox of voting. American Political Science Review 60:384–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, D., Luce, R., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A. 1971. Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ludwin, W. 1976. Voting methods: a simulation. Public Choice 25:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, S. III., 1979. Approval voting: a ‘best buy’ method for multi-candidate elections? Mathematics Magazine 3:98–102.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. III., 1980. Strategic decisions under one-stage multicandidate voting systems. Public Choice 36:115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, D. 1975. Maximum justice and an alternative principle of general advantage. American Political Science Review 69:630–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, A. 1976. The divine science: political engineering in American culture. American Political Science Review 70:140–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richelson, J. 1975. A comparative analysis of social choice functions. Behavioral Science 20: 331–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. 1972. The foundation of statistics. New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Tullock, G., and Campbell, C. 1970. Computer simulation of a small voting system. Economic Journal 80: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, V. 1975. Justice as fairness: for groups? American Political Science Review 69: 607–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. J. 1978. Comparison of voting systems. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Weber, R. J.Reproducing voting systems. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.