Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:49:13.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voting Correctly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard R. Lau and
David P. Redlawsk
Richard R. Lau
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
David P. Redlawsk
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The average voter falls far short of the prescriptions of classic democratic theory in terms of interest, knowledge, and participation in politics. We suggest a more realistic standard: Citizens fulfill their democratic duties if, most of the time, they vote “correctly.” Relying on an operationalization of correct voting based on fully informed interests, we present experimental data showing that, most of the time, people do indeed manage to vote correctly. We also show that voters' determinations of their correct vote choices can be predicted reasonably well with widely available survey data. We illustrate how this measure can be used to determine the proportion of the electorate voting correctly, which we calculate at about 75% for the five American presidential elections between 1972 and 1988. With a standard for correct vote decisions, political science can turn to exploring the factors that make it more likely that people will vote correctly.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , September 1997, pp. 585 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rohde, David. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86(03):55–69.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1975. Financing the 1972 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1979. Financing the 1976 Election. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1983. Financing the 1980 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Bauer, Monica. 1991. Financing the 1988 Election. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Haggerty, Brian A.. 1987. Financing the 1984 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1990. “Public Opinion and Political Interests.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uniformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(02):194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1988. News: The Politics of Illusion. 2d ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1992. The Governing Crisis: Media, Money and Marketing in American Elections. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review 59(03):7–28.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1974. “Theory and Voting Research: Some Reflections on Converse's ‘Change in the American Electorate.’” American Political Science Review 68(12): 1002–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1972. “On ‘Interests’ in Politics.” Politics and Society 2(Summer):459–77.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Delli, Carpini|Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1995. “Political Knowledge and Enlightened Group Interests.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Delli, Carpini|Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Mark. 1980. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelly E.. 1991. Social Cognition. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert. 1979. Deciding What's News. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., and Mirer, Thad W.. 1974. “The Simple Act of Voting.” American Political Science Review 68(06):572–91.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Changing Perspectives on Political Thinking.” Invited address to the 81st annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1986. “Political Schemata, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior.” In Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ed. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1989. “Construct Accessibility and Electoral Choice.” Political Behavior 11(03):5–32.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1992. “Searchable Information during an Election Campaign.” Rutgers University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1995. “Information Search during an Election Campaign: Introducing a Process Tracing Methodology for Political Scientists.” In Political Information Processing, ed. Lodge, Milton and McGraw, Kathleen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1992. “How Voters Decide: A Process Tracing Study of Decision Making during Political Campaigns.” Presented at the 88th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. N.d. “An Experimental Study of Information Search, Memory, and Decision Making during a Political Campaign.” In Political Psychology and Public Opinion, ed. Kuklinski, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Sears, David O., eds. 1986. Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen, and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83(06):399–419.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Steenbergen, Marco R., with Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(06):309–27.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B., and Converse, Philip E.. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73(12):1055–70.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58(06):361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Predictions: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of the Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1971. The Power Elite. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meuller, John. 1992. “Democracy and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery: Elections, Equality, and the Minimal Human Being.” American Journal of Political Science 36(11):983–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Miller, Arthur H., Brody, Richard, Dennis, Jack, Kovenock, David, Shanks, Merrill, and the Center for Political Studies. 1975. The CPS 1972 American National Election Study: Pre- and Post-Election Waves, Volumes I and II. [computer file] (Study #7010). Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan. 1st ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1977. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Miller, Arthur H., and the Center for Political Studies. 1977. The CPS 1976 American National Election Study: Pre- and Post-Election Waves, Volumes I and II. [computer file] (Study #7381). Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan. 1st ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1977. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies. 1982. American National Election Study, 1980. Volume 1: Pre- and Post-Election Surveys. [computer file] (Study #7763). Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1982. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1982.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies. 1986. American National Election Study, 1984. Pre- and Post-Election Survey File. [computer file] (Study #8298). Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1986. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1986.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies. 1989. American National Election Study, 1988. Pre- and Post-Election Survey. [computer file] (Study #9196). Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1989. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1989.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public-Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles W.. 1960. “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Politics 22(05):276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and MacDonald, Stuart Elaine. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83(03):93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Information Processing Models of Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 30:363–396.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(09): 1124–31.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.