Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:52:24.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dalbergia Sissoo Roxburgh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

K. R. Maxwell-Hyslop
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The identification of Old Persian yakā- with Dalbergia sissoo Roxburgh was suggested by Ilya Gershevitch in a memorable article in 1957 after extensive investigations in the Bashākard mountains of northern Iranian Makran (east of L. 58, c. 100 miles north-east of Jask). The sissoo has been defined as a “large deciduous tree, bark grey, heartwood brown with darker veins, leaflets 3–5, broadly elliptical or ovate”, and K. A. Chowdhury has studied its distribution in northern India, starting from the Indus, spreading east to Assam, sticking to the sub-Himalayan tracts and usually going up to 1,000 m. above sea level. It also extends far into the plains along river banks. In Baluchistan it grows in the Suleiman range between the Indus and the Zhob rivers, having been noted as early as 1890 by J. H. Lace in his study of the vegetation of Baluchistan in the Wam Tangi forest situated in the limestone ranges in the Hurnai district, where it reached a height of 35 feet. Its distribution within Pakistan includes the districts of Dera Ghazi Khan, Dera Ismail Khan, Bannu, Hazara, and it can be seen in Peshawar growing on the University campus and in front of Dean's Hotel (Pl. XXIIIa). A specimen from Nepal was given to Sir Max Mallowan in 1973 and is illustrated here (Fig. 1).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 33 , December 1983, pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies XIX (1957), 319–20Google Scholar.

2 Brandis, D., Indian Trees (London, 1906), 233Google Scholar: Street, , Exotic Trees of the British Commonwealth (Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar, Pl. 13.

3 Chowdhury, K. A., Ancient Agriculture and Forestry in Northern India (Bombay, 1977)Google Scholar, map 2.

4 Lace, and Hemsley, in Journal ofthe Linnaen Society 28 (1890–1891), 248–313Google Scholar.

5 Journal of Oman Studies. Special Report. Sultanate of Oman Ministry of Information and Culture (1977), 255, 265.

6 Vallat, F. in Syria 48 (1971), 57–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; R. Ass. 64 (1970), 155Google Scholar, 31.

7 Foreign Trade in the Old Babylonian Period (Leiden, 1960), 12Google Scholar, n. 1, 159: Edzard, , Farber, , Sollberger, , Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cuneiformes (Wiesbaden, 1977) IGoogle Scholar, s.v. Magan.

8 Der Anschnitt 5–6 (1981), 174–263Google Scholar.

9 Heimpel, W., “A first step in the diorite question”. R. Ass. 76 (1982), 65–7Google Scholar.

10 Thureau-Dangin, , Les Inscriptions de Sumer et d'Akkad (1906), 155Google Scholar, cyl. A. XV. 8–9; 116, stat. C. 14–15.

11 Oppenheim in J.A.O.S. (1954), 6–17Google Scholar: Sollberger, and Kupper, , Inscriptions royales Sumériennes et Akkadiens (1971) 136Google Scholar.

12 Oppenheim, op. cit., 14, 15.

13 Written MES.MÁ.GAN.AN.NA which may denote uncertainty in the description of a rare foreign wood. cf. UET VII 28 obv. 2. Professor Gurney informs me that he would read GIŠ.MES.MÁ.GAN.AN.NA as GIŠ.MES.MÁ.GANan.NA, interpreting the AN as a phonetic indicator.

14 Iraq XIV (1952), 24–44Google Scholar.

15 Iraq XXV (1963), 56Google Scholar. 1.49.

16 Rost, , Tiglath-Pileser III (Leipzig, 1893), p. 60: 24Google Scholar.

17 Forest Trees and Timbers of the British Empire IV: Éggeling, W. J. and Harris, C. M., Fifteen Uganda Timbers (Oxford, 1939), 93 ffGoogle Scholar. See also Limet, , “Les Schémas du Commerce Neo-Sumérien”, Iraq XXXIX (1977), 54Google Scholar, n.15.

18 Luckenbill, , OIP 2 (1924)Google ScholarAnnals of Sennacherib 115, VIII: 53, 60.

19 OIP 2, 26, I: 55. Parpola, , Neo-Assyrian Toponyms (1970), 149, 154Google Scholar.

20 CAD, s.v. musukkannu.

21 See f.6.

22 South Asian Archaeology 1977, Naples (1979), 87–139Google Scholar.

23 Marshall, , Mohenjo Daro (London, 1931) I, 19Google Scholar; Ratnagar, S., Encounters: The Westerly Trade of the Harappa Civilisation (Delhi, 1981), 102Google Scholar.

24 CAD (s.v. ṣulmu) suggests that mēsu could be identified with the Celtis tree but no reasons are given. Celtis australis – the Nettle tree – is used today for many of the same purposes as the sissoo tree and its distribution in sub-tropical regions of the Northern hemisphere includes the Himalaya ranges from swampy sites at 2,000 feet to dry rocky ground at 8,000 feet. It has not been recorded in Oman or from Harappan sites.

25 Burhān-i qāṭi definition, Gershevitch op. cit., 319.