Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T12:34:15.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

George L. Cowgill
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA

Abstract

To begin the discussion, I propose distinctions between four archaeological approaches to time. I call these clock time, phase time, social time, and characterization. Main points in the other papers are that Postclassic phases tend to be a century or more earlier than recently thought, that Aztec I may be much earlier than thought, and that there may be considerable temporal overlap among Postclassic phases. The evidence is fairly good for the first of these points, but less clear for the other two—more data are needed. I propose a slightly revised Teotihuacan chronology and mention some issues about the nature of the Teotihuacan to post-Teotihuacan transition.

Information

Type
Special Section: Recent Chronological Research in Central Mexico
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable