Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:37:44.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of prediction equations incorporated in a computer program to ration beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. D. St C. Neal,
M. Gill,
J. France,
A. Spedding and
S. Marsden
H. D. St C. Neal
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
M. Gill
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
J. France
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
A. Spedding
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley MK2 2EF
S. Marsden
Affiliation:
Dalgety Agriculture Ltd, Dalgety House, The Promenade, Clifton, Bristol BS8 3NJ
Get access

Abstract

Equations for the prediction of forage dry-matter intake, metabolizable energy (ME), rumen degradable protein and undegraded protein, based on those in the current Agricultural Research Council system, were incorporated into a computer program designed to be used by livestock advisors for on-farm rationing of beef cattle. The predictions of silage intake and live-weight gain are compared with experimental data.

Voluntary intake of grass silage was generally over-estimated by the program by proportionately at least 0·06, with a root mean square error of ±0·18 of the mean observed silage intake for the all-silage rations. The prediction of ME requirement for observed production had an error of +0·15 of average ME intake but the calculations of ME intake were themselves dependent on the predictions of the ME concentrations of the silages and supplements. Similarly the comparison of protein supply with requirement was highly dependent on the value assigned to N-degradability. However, the program can be used to assess how changes in the input values would affect ration formulation.

The mathematical basis of the program is described in the Appendix.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1988, pp. 169 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Barber, W. P., Adamson, A. H. and Altman, J. F. B. 1984. New methods of forage evaluation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1984 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 161–176. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, J. and Toutenburg, H. 1977. Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models. Chapter 1.5.4. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Black, J. L., Beever, D. E., Faichney, G. J., Howarth, B. R. and Graham, N. McC. 1980. Simulation of the effects of rumen function on the flow of nutrients from the stomach of sheep: Part I — Description of a computer program. Agricultural Systems 6: 195–219.Google Scholar
Blaxtfr, K. L. 1974. Metabolizable energy and feeding systems for ruminants. In University of Nottingham Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers: 7 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 3–25. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, P. and Gill, M. 1983. The effect of wilting and short-chopping of grass on the subsequent voluntary intake of silage, and live-weight gain of calves. Animal Production 36: 73–77.Google Scholar
England, P. and Gill, M. 1985. The effect of fish meal and sucrose supplementation on the voluntary intake of grass silage and live-weight gain of young cattle. Animal Production 40: 259–265.Google Scholar
Gill, M. and England, P. 1984. Effect of degradability of protein supplements on voluntary intake and nitrogen retention in young cattle fed grass silage. Animal Production 39: 31–36.Google Scholar
Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique. 1979. [The system of bulk units for cattle.] Bulletin Technique, Centre de Recherches Zootechniques et Veterinaires de Theix 38: 57–79.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. 1981. Equations for predicting silage intake by beef and dairy cattle. In Summary of Papers of the Sixth Silage Conference (ed. Harkess, R. D. and Castle, M. E.), p. 35. The School of Agriculture, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. 1981. The Biochemistry of Silage. Wiley, Chichcster.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin, No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and McIlmoyle, W. A. 1982. The effect of frequency of harvesting grass for silage and level of concentrate supplementation on the intake and performance of beef cattle. Animal Production 35: 245–252.Google Scholar
Theil, H. 1966. Applied Economic Forecasting. Chapter 2. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Wilkinson, J. M. and Tayler, J. C. 1975. The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. 1. The effect of level and source of supplementary nitrogen on the utilization of maize silage by cattle of different ages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84: 353–364.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Kitcherside, M. A., Keirby, J. R. and Hall, P. A. 1984. Evaluation of protein foods for dairy cows. Animal Production 38: 548 (Abstr.).Google Scholar