Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T21:07:20.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding objectives for red deer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. McManus and
R. Thompson
C. McManus
Affiliation:
AFRC Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS‡
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
AFRC Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS‡
Get access

Abstract

The definition of breeding objectives for farmed red deer in the United Kingdom (UK) was investigated. Options studied include the effects of discounting gene flow and the effect of altering variable costs/income (such as price of food or price received for sale animals). Three different herd structures were investigated. As the discount rate increased the importance of traits measured on the offspring also increased. Traits included in the economic breeding objective included number of calves weaned, carcass weights of stag calves and surplus hinds, hind calf live weight and food consumption for hinds and calves. The breeding objective derived does not include a measure of antler size, as antlers have little/no economic value in the UK market. Suggestions are made for further research.

Keywords

breeding objectivesred deer

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , August 1993, pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bird, P. J. W. N. and Mitchell, G. 1980. The choice of discount rate in animal breeding investment appraisal. Animal Breeding Abstracts 48:499–505.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Kay, R. N. B., Sharman, G. A. M., Cunningham, J. M. M., Eadie, J. and Hamilton, W. J. 1988. Farming the red deer. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Dickerson, D. E. 1982. Principles in establishing breeding objectives for livestock. Proceedings of the world congress on sheep and beef cattle breeding (ed. Barton, R. A. and Smith, W. C.), vol. 1, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Bichard, M. and Pease, A. 1976. Objectives in pig breeding. Animal Production 23: 365–387.Google Scholar
Harris, D. L. 1970. Breeding for efficiency in livestock production: defining the economic objectives. Journal of Animal Science 30: 860–865.Google Scholar
Harris, D. L., Stewart, T. S. and Arboleda, C. R. 1984. Animal breeding programs: a systematic approach to their design. USDA-ARS-Advances in agricultural technology AAT-NC-8. USDA-ARS, Preoria, II.Google Scholar
Hazel, D. L. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476–490.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1974. Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations. Animal Production 18:117–139.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. 1990. A place for deer on lowland farms? In Deer farming — a realistic alternative, pp. 9–13. British Deer Farmers' Association.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1982a. Economic aspects of developing breeding objectives: general considerations. In Future developments in the genetic improvement of animals (ed. Barker, J. S. F., Hammond, K. and McClintock, A. E.), pp. 107–118. Academic Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1982b. Construction, uses and problems of multitrait selection indices. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. V, pp. 130–139. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1986. Economic evaluation of breeding objectives in sheep and goats — general considerations. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. 9, pp. 470–478.Google Scholar
Lincoln, G. A. 1985. Seasonal breeding of deer. Biology of deer production. Royal Society of New Zealand, bulletin 22, pp. 165–179.Google Scholar
McClintock, A. E. and Cunningham, E. P. 1974. Selection in dual purpose cattle populations: defining the breeding objective. Animal Production 18: 237–247.Google Scholar
McManus, C. 1991. Genetic and phenotypic aspects of performance in farmed red deer. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. E. 1982. Economic aspects of the choice of a breeding objective. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Madrid, pp. 50–59.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, R. W. 1982. Breeding objectives for sheep improvement programmes. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. V, pp. 619–634.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, R. W. 1986. A profit equation for the definition of the breeding objective of Australian Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 103:342–357.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, R. W. 1988. The derivation of economic values combining income and expense in different ways: an example with Australian Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 105:143–153.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, R. W. and Newman, S. 1989. Developing breeding objectives for Australian beef cattle prdouction. Animal Production 49: 35–47.Google Scholar
Ronningen, K. 1971. Tables for estimating the loss in efficiency when selecting according to an index based on a false economic ratio between two traits. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavian 21: 33–49.Google Scholar
Vandepitte, W. M. and Hazel, L. N. 1977. The effect of errors in the economic weights on the accuracy of selection indices. Annales de Genetique et de Selection Animale 9: 87–103.Google Scholar
Willham, R. L. 1988. Selection objectives and programs applied to beef breeds in order to improve efficiency: North American example. Proceedings of the third world congress sheep and beef cattle breeding, pp. 261–273. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar