Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:51:49.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on red clover silage for cattle finishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Day,
R. D. Harkess and
D. M. Harrison
N. Day
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
R. D. Harkess
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
D. M. Harrison
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
Get access

Abstract

Trials were carried out over two winters to compare red clover and grass silage for cattle finishing.

The silages were mixed to give rations containing 0,25,50,75 or 100% red clover dry-matter and were offered ad libitum to individually fed British Friesian-type steers. Significant differences in dry-matter intake occurred but the effect of silage type on animal performance was not significant. Barley supplementation had a significant effect on both total dry-matter intake and daily live-weight gain.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978, pp. 97 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H. and McGowan, M. 1969. The assessment of the nutritive value of silage by determination of in vitro digestibility of homogenates prepared from fresh undried silage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1974. Red clover silage for milk production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 29: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J., Harkess, R. D. and Hunt, I. V. 1974. Potentiality studies of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) Proc. XIII int. Grassld Congr., Moscow, Sec. 2, pp. 125–129.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Reid, G. W. 1976. Grazing trials with red clover. Norgrass 16: 6–9.Google Scholar
Harkess, R. D. and Alexander, R. H. 1969. The digestibility and productivity of selected herbage varieties. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 282–289.Google Scholar
Harkess, R. D., Frame, J. and Hunt, I. V. 1971. Factors affecting the digestibility of herbage species in artificial pastures. Proc. 4th Eur. Grassld Fed., Lausanne 1971, 131–136.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1975. The consumption of perennial ryegrass and red clover by grazing lambs. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 307–313.Google Scholar
MacKie, C. K. and Copeman, G. J. F. 1975. Development of the use of tetraploid red clover. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 43 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Wilkins, R. J. 1976. Conserved forage—complement or competitor to concentrates. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 343–364. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1975. The nutritive value of red clover and perennial ryegrass harvested in the autumn. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 89 (Abstr.).Google Scholar