Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:05:19.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative Language Teaching and Related Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Brian Parkinson and
John Maher
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this section we shall look at ‘movements’ or ‘approaches,’ other than the communicative approach, which have influenced language teaching at the same time as the communicative approach has been dominant. Some definitions of the communicative approach include some of the concerns discussed here, while others exclude them, but an understanding of these alternative response to perceived deficiencies in earlier language teaching practices should clarify the context of the communicative movement.

Information

Type
Communicative Language Teaching
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 8 , March 1987, pp. 126 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ashton-Warner, S. 1963. Teacher. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Bancroft, W. J. 1978. The Lozanov method and its American adaptations. Modern language journal. 62. 4. 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binor, S. 1974. The realtive effectiveness of mastery learning strategies in second language acquisition Chicago: University of chicago. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Blair, R. W. (ed.) 1982. Innovative approaches to language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Brendell, G. A. 1983. A model for mastery learning in German. ADFL bulletin 15. 1. 37–40. [ERIC EJ288297; FL515320.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers college record. 64. 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, K. 1982. Mastery learning topic summary report: Research on school effectiveness project. Juneau: Alaska State Department of Education. [ERIC 218279; SP020495.]Google Scholar
Curran, C. 1978. Counseling learning in second languages. Apple River, IL: Apple River Press.Google Scholar
d'Anglejan, A. 1978. Language learning in and out of classrooms. In Richards, J. C. (ed.) Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 218–237.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1982. Informal and formal approaches to communicative language teaching. ELT Journal. 36. 2. 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. M. 1977. Effect of computer delivered teaching on achievement in a mastery learning course of study with partial scoring and variable pacing. Mimeo. [ERIC ED156214; IR006447.]Google Scholar
Fadil, V. A. 1975. More understanding and appreciation: Learning for mastery in a literature course. TESOL quarterly. 9. 4. 367–377. [ERIC EJ131091; FL508421.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallwey, T. 1974. The inner game of tennis. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Garves, R. 1980. Mastery learning: Team approach--September 1977-August 1980. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Department of Education. [Project termination report.] [ERIC ED195564; TM810004.]Google Scholar
Gattegno, C. 1963. Teaching foreign languages in schools: The Silent Way. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
Gattegno, C. 1975. The mind teaches the brain. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
Jarvis, G. 1976. An integrative approach to FLT: Choosing among the options. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company and American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, J. 1960. Freedom from the known. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. 1981. Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, J. 1986. The state of the art: English for medical purposes. Language teaching. 19. 2. 112–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, G. 1978. Caring and sharing in the foreign language class. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pillet, E. E. 1975. A study of affective and cognitive developement in an introductory French course. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Riggle, R. 1978. Psychological constraints on the utilization of a mastery approach to the language arts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Kansas City, 11. [ERIC ED168011; CS204686.]Google Scholar
Rivers, W. 1964. The psychologist and the foreign language teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T. 1982. State of the art: Recent developements in ELT. Language teaching. 15. 3. 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saféris, F. 1978. Une révolution dans l'art d'apprendre. [A revolution in the art of understanding.] Paris: Robert Laffort.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. 1978. Social and psychological factors in second language acquistion. In Richards, J. C. (ed.) Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 163–178.Google Scholar
Seligr, H. W. 1979. On the nature and function of language rules in language teaching. TESOL quarterly. 13.3 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, D. A. 1983. The curriculum matrix: A management system for mastery laerning. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for supervision and Curriculum Developement, Houston, 03. [ERIC ED250819; EAo17324.]Google Scholar
Strassler, G. 1981. An evaluation of compentency-based school programs in a learning for mastery setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angles, 04. [ERIC ED200626; TMB10211.]Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1985. The use of a computer tutorial as a replacement for human tution in a mastery learning strategy. Computers and education. 9.2. 101–109. [ERIC EJ318713; IR514120.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winitz, H. (ed.) 1981. The comprehensive approach to foreign languages instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. C. 1980. Mastery learning in secondary school: A first year report. [ERIC ED194453; SP016636.]Google Scholar
Young, S. M. 1979. Reading for mastery: An instructional guides. St. Louis, MO: St. Louis Board of Education. [ERIC ED185499; CS005346.]Google Scholar