Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-03T23:32:37.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in Teacher Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

H. G. Widdowson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All of the issues dealt with in the preceding sections of this volume clearly carry with them implications for language teaching and call for a reconsideration of the teacher role, the nature of pedagogic competence which such a role requires, and how people might be most effectively prepared to enact it. In the case of national curricula, as discussed in Section 1 of this volume, whatever proposals are made at the macro-level of educational policy depend for their effectiveness on the interpretation by teachers at a micro-level of pedagogic practice and their abilities to carry out the proposals. So whatever is proposed for language education as policy carries clear implications for language teacher education as well. This might seem to be all too self-evident, but it is easy to cite instances where policy decisions have been made and proposals imposed without taking such implications into account.

Information

Type
Innovation In Second Language Teaching
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 13 , March 1992 , pp. 260 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alatis, J. E. (ed.) 1990. Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The Interdependence of theory, practice and research. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990.]Google Scholar
Alatis, J. E. (ed.) 1991. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991.]Google Scholar
Allwright, D. 1988. Observation in the language classroom. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Allwright, D. and Bailey, K.. 1991. Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. 1990. The use of diary studies in teacher education programmes. In Richards, J. and Nunan, D. (eds.) Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 215–226.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (ed.) 1970. Perspectives in personal construct theory. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, L. 1990. Teacher development through reflective teaching. In Richards, J. and Nunan, D. (eds.) Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202–214.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1983. The integration of theory and practice. In Alatis, J. E., Stern, H. H. and Strevens, P. (eds.) Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Towards a rationale. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 59–73. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1983.]Google Scholar
Candlin, C. and Widdowson, H. G. (eds.) 1987–1993. Language teaching: A scheme for language teacher education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [A Teacher Development Series for Language Teachers.]Google Scholar
Cazden, C. 1990. Recent publications in classroom research. TESOL Quarterly. 24.717–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. 1983. Problem-solving: A bridge builder between theory and practice. In Alatis, J. E., Stern, H. H. and Strevens, P. (eds.) Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Towards a rationale. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 97–105. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1983.]Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. 1988. Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. 1989. Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, D. 1988. A practical handbook of language teaching. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Cullen, R. 1991. Video in teacher training: The use of local materials. English Language Teaching Journal. 45.33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. and Rinvolucri, M.. 1990. The confidence book. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Doff, A. 1988. Teach English. A training course for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Trainers' Handbook/Teachers' Workbook.]Google Scholar
Ellis, G. and Sinclair, B.. 1989. Learning to learn English: A course in learner training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. 1989. Teacher training, development and decision making. TESOL Quarterly. 23.27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, D. 1991. Mistaken constructs: Re-examining the nature and assumptions of language teacher education. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 25–39. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991.]Google Scholar
Harmer, J. 1991. The practice of language teaching. London: Longman. [New edition.]Google Scholar
Houston, W. R. (ed.) 1990. Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jarvis, J. 1992. Using diaries for teacher reflection on in-service courses. English language Teaching Journal. 46.133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. A. 1955. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. 1970. A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In Bannister, D. (ed.) Perspectives in personal construct theory. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R.. 1982. The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1983. Training teachers or educating a teacher? In Alatis, J. E., Stern, H. H. and Strevens, P. (eds.) Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Towards a rationale. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 264–274. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1983.]Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. H.. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Laycock, J. and Bunnag, P.. 1991. Developing teacher self-awareness: Feedback and use of video. English Language Teaching Journal. 45.43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. 1983. Training the second language teacher as classroom researcher. In Alatis, J. E., Stern, H. H. and Strevens, P. (eds.) Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Towards a rationale. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 281–297. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1983.]Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 1990. Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maley, A. 1986. XANADU—“A miracle of rare device”: The teaching of English in China. In Valdes, J. (ed.) Culture bound: Bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. 102–111.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. 1989a. A client-centered approach to teacher development. English Language Teaching Journal. 43.111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. 1989b. Understanding language classrooms: A guide for teacherinitiated action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. 1990. Action research in the language classroom. In Richards, J. and Nunan, D. (eds.) Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–81.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rea-Dickens, P. and Germaine, K.. 1992. Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 1987. The dilemma of teacher education in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 21.209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Reprinted in Richards, J. and Nunan, D. (eds.) Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–15 1990.]Google Scholar
Richards, J. 1990. Integrating theory and practice in second language teacher education. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice and research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 76–99. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990.]Google Scholar
Schoen, D. 1983. The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. 1988. The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. 1992. Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1983. Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittrock, M. C. (ed.) 1986. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar