Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T10:27:42.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Paul Fletcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Language pathology is a broad term, used to refer to the symptoms of speech and language speech and language disorders, the aetiologies of these disorders, and the methods and results of the disciplines which study them. The major disciplines involved are medicine, psychology, and linguistics (including speech science). It is neither possible nore desirable, in an inter-disciplinary field, to ignore the contribution of other sciences. Here, however, the concentration will be, so far as is feasible, on the distincitve role of linguistics in the investigation of language disorders. The term language disorder is used as a general label for any persistent non-normal linguistic behaivor in children or adults.

Information

Type
Language in Society
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 10 , March 1989 , pp. 26 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ball, M. 1988. LARSP to LLARSP: The design of a grammatical profile for Welsh. Clinical linguistics and phonetics. 2.1.55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R., Rom, A., and Hirsch, M.. 1982. Working with HARSP. Internal publications (02). Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
Bol, G., and Kuiken, F.. 1980. Grammatike analyse von taalontwikkelingsstoornissen. [The grammatical analysis of disorders of language development.] Publications of the Linguistics Department 26. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. and Hirson, A.. 1987. From conceptual intention to utterances: A study of impaired language output in a child with development aphasia. British jornal of disorders of communication. 22.1.37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clashen, H.. 1986. Die profilanalyse. [Profile analysis.] Berlin: Marhold.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G. 1987. Mother-child talk with language-impaired children. In Martin, J. A. M. et al. , (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Specific Speech and Language Impairment in Children. London: AFASIC. 276–283.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G. and Gunn, M.. 1986. The development of a conversational disability: A case study. British Journal of disorders of communication. 21.3.339–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, W. and Zurif, E.. 1983 Aphasia: Information processing in language production and reception. In Butterworth, B. (ed.) Language production. 2 vols. London: Academic Press. 225–256.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. and Tallal, P.. In press. On the nature of language-impaired children. In Miller, J. (ed.) Research in child language disorders: A decade of progress. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. 1983. From sound to Syntax: A learner's guide. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Wisconsin on Symposium Child Language. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 1–28.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. 1990. Evidence from syntax for language impairment. In Miller, J. (ed.) Research in child language disorders: A decade of progress. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. and Garman, M.. 1983a. LARSPing by numbers. British journal of disorders of communication. 23.3.309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, P. and Garman, M.. 1988b. Normal language development and language impairment. Clinical linguistics and phonetics. 2.2.97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, P. and Peters, J.. 1984. Characterising language impairment in children: An exploratory study. Language testing. 1.1.33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, A. 1988. The LARSP profile of the normal five year old, with special reference to phrase structure. British journal of disorders of communication. 23.3.293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. 1982. Is Broca's aphasia a phonological deficit? In Crystal, D. (ed.) Linguistic controversies. London: Edward Arnold. 152–171.Google Scholar
Garman, M. 1990. Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrett, M. 1988. Processes in language production. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.) Linguuistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 69–96.Google Scholar
Gutfreund, M., Harrison, M., and Wells, G.. 1989. Bristol language development scales. Winsor: NFFR-Nelson.Google Scholar
Haas, W. 1963. Phonological analysis of a case of dyslalia. Journal of speech and hearing disorders. 28.239–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, M. 1987. The early acquisition of Irish: Grammatical patterns and the role of formulas. Reading, UK: University of Reading. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1968. Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. 1985. Cognitive prerequisites: The evidence from children learning English. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. 2 vols. Hillsadle, NJ: Erlbaum. 961–1004.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. and Kamhi, A.. 1984. Synactic and semantic aspects of the utterances of language-impaired children: The same can be less. Merrill-Palmer quarterly. 30. 65–85.Google Scholar
Keqn, M-L. 1977. The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example. Cognition. 5. 9–46.Google Scholar
Lenoard, L. et al. 1987. Specific language impairment in children: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and language. 32.233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoard, L. et al. 1988. Some influences on the grammar of English- and Italian- speaking children with specific language impirment. Applied psycholingustics. 9.39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTear, M. 1985. Pragmatic disorders: A case study of converational disability. British journal of disorders of communication. 20.2.129–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, C. and Behrmann, M.. 1986. Towards a classification scheme for aphasic syntax. British journal of disorders of communication. 21.1.21–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prutting, C. 1987. The pragmatic dimension: Discourse as a multi-level process. In Martin, J. A. M. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children. London: Association for all Speech-Impaired Children. 114–134.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. J. 1987. The causes of language disorder: Introduction and overview. In Martin, J. A. M. et al. , (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children. London: Association for all Speech-Impaired Children. 1–19.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. and Dunn, C.. 1985. Normal and disordered phonology in children. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. 1987. The neuropsychology of developmental language disorders. In Martin, J. A. M. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium of Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children in Children. London: Association for All Speech-Impaired Children. 36–47.Google Scholar
Ward, I. C. 1937. The use of the speech mechanism in certain African language. Speech. 2.3.28–32.Google Scholar