No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
[Unplanned] Language Policy and Planning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2008
Extract
Naturally enough, the field of language planning, as its name suggests, has concentrated its efforts on the description and practice of planned language development. This is after all its raison d'être, to provide future oriented, problem-solving language-change strategies to meet particular language needs. This orientation means that language planning is one of the key descriptive topics in applied linguistics, bringing together as it does theory from a variety of disciplines and putting that into practice. Grabe and Kaplan (1992) estimate that the applied linguistics aspects of language policy and planning make up one of four categories that accounts for about 45 percent of the items published in this field.
Information
- Type
- Foundations of Language Policy and Planning
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994
References
Unannotated Bibliography
Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J. A. (eds.) 1983. Progress in language planning:International perspectives. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 29–45.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R. B.. 1992. Introduction. In Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R. B. (eds.) Introduction to applied linguistics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1983. The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice.In Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J. A. (eds.) Progress in language planning: International perspectives. Berlin: Mouton. 269–289.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. 1989. Language and schooling in Western and American Samoa.World Englishes. 8.59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. E. 1990. Language-in-education planning. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. , (eds.) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 10. New York: Cambridge University Press. 53–78.Google Scholar
Jourdan, C. 1990. Solomons Pijin: An unrecognised national language. In Baldauf, R. B. Jr. and Luke, A. (eds.) Language planning and education in Australasia and the South Pacific. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters. 167–181.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. 1989. Language planning vs planning language. In Candlin, C. N. and McNamara, T. F. (eds.) Language, learning and community. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University. 193–203.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. 1990. Introduction: Language planning in theory and practice. InBaldauf, R. B. Jr and Luke, A. (eds.) Language planning and education in Australasia and the South Pacific. Clevedon, Avon: MultilingualMatters. 3–13.Google Scholar
LaPonce, J. A. 1987. Languages and their territories. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Luke, A., McHoul, A. W. and Mey, J. L.. 1990. On the limits of language planning: Class, state and power. In Baldauf, R. B. Jr., Luke, A.(eds.) Language planning and education in Australasia and the South Pacific. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters. 25–44.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. and Jernudd, B. H. 1971. Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing nations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Russo, C. and Baldauf, R. B. Jr. 1986. Language development without planning:A case study of tribal Aborigines in the Northern Territory, Australia.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 7.301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souaiaia, M. (1990) Language, education and politics in the Maghreb.Language, Culture and Curriculum. 3.109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66
- Cited by