* The following special abbreviations and Sigla are used:

Bergson = Bergson, Leif, Zur Stellung des Adjektivs in der älteren griechischen Prosa (Stockholm 1960), 60–1Google Scholar, 98-103, 167-8

Brunei = Brunei, Jean, La construction de l’adjectifdans lesgroupes nominaux du grec (Paris 1963), 102–12Google Scholar

Denniston = Denniston, J.D., Greek Prose Style (Oxford 1960)Google Scholar, Chap. 3

Dover = Dover, K.J., Greek Word Order (Cambridge 1960)Google Scholar, Chap. 4

Hude = Herodoti Historiae, ed. Hude, Carolus (O.C.T.) (Oxford 1940)Google Scholar

Palm = Palm, Jonas, ZurFunktion und Stellung des attributiven Demonstrativums in griechischen (Lund 1960)Google Scholar

Powell = Powell, J. Enoch, A Lexicon to Herodotus (Cambridge 1938)Google Scholar

¹ Dover 35 n. 5; Bergson 11; Palm 4.

² Harry, J.E., ‘The Omission of the Article with Substantives after ούτος, δδε, εκείνος in Prose’. TAPA 29 (1898), 48–64.Google Scholar

³ Powell s.v. ό A II 2, 3.

⁴ There are 82 examples of relationship words anarthrous, mostly in speeches, and 63 of βασιλεύς. This use is not a matter of familiar speech, as Schwyzer suggests. With the possessive adjective NoK:oNoK 21:3.

⁵ Powell s.v. όστις 2. a b c e needs some re-examination. Brunei 103: ‘Quant à son absence éventuelle, elle ne peut répondre en aucun cas à une valeur proprement indéfinie.’

⁶ This suggests a preference for the anarthrous instrumental; semantically it is a very short list: χερσί ώμοισι δυνάμι φύσι, τρόπω νόμω νόμοισι, όλεθρωψυχτ\σι, 'όχω νηοσι. ΝοΑ31:οΝοΑ2.

⁷ Deictic δδε. All in speeches except the epigram. Add to Powell's list 5.49.5* bis before: 5.49.5*, 6* bis after, all proper names. NP 1.206.2; 3.21.3; 4.118.4; 5.49.6; 5.77.5s epigram: 7.8a.2, 35.2s; 8.65.5, 140ß.2; 9.27.1. NP 1.9.1, 108.5; 4.9.4; 5.49.6.

⁸ Emphasis is always relative, and is indicated here only crudely; to mark the varying degrees of emphasis in a sentence would need something as elaborate as anopera score.

⁹ referring forward. Hude anarthrous, rightly: 1.31.2*; 3.3.1; 5.6.1; 7.167.1; 8.135.5::2.43.1, 131.1.

¹⁰ PN 2.169.2; 3.21.3*; 4.139.1, 179.1. PQN 2.166.1; 3.100.

¹¹ Internal object NP 2.65.4; 3.137.2, 160.1; 4.148.4; 7.8a.l*; 8.111.2. NqP 2.115.4, 156.4;6.56. NsP2.177.2;5.45.1;7.5.3;8.137.4;9.120.3*. With . 1.16.2. Internal subject NqP 2.48.3. NsP 1.132.1; 2.17.5, 38.3; 4.?23.3; 6.23.3. Existence NP 3.128.4, 153.1. NsP 2.168.1; 7.123.3. Have opinion NP 2.56.1. Use NP 2.147.3. Prep. pNqP 2.164.2. pNAMP 1.70.2. Postp. NqP 4.135.2. Acc. respectNP1.99.1;2.41.1 θεούς μούνους?^??4.59.1. PsTN5.7. HAP7.109.1 bis.

¹² Proper names NP 4.150.2; 6.127.4. Common all* 1.31.5,35.4; 2.39.3,114.3,115.6; 4.9.3, 97.3; 5.19.2, 20.1, 2; 7.49.1, 130.1, 209.2. 1.160.5 refers back rather (deictic arthrous Powell).

¹³ The examples with numbers are preceded by lists of proper names. 1.102.2 probably δύο ταύτα εθνεα κα'ι αμφότερα ισχυρά 4.37 asyndeton! ταύτα τέσσερα εθνεα 6.98. 2 τριών τοοτεων επεζίις χενέων really a weak central demonstrative.

¹⁴ For9.11.2* see note 4.

¹⁵ See Denniston, Chap. 3; Dover, Chap. 4; Bergson 101–8 passim.

¹⁶ Palm 24.

¹⁷ Central 3 οδε 27 ούτος (8.47 is not an example). Preceded by:

ώυτός(16) 1.44.2, 187.1, 185.2; 3.131.3; 4.35.1,38.2,145.1,147.1; 5.77.2; 6.27.2,

69.3*, 92J; 7.15.3*, 151; 8.15.1; 9.98.4 suspect,

participle (5) 2.212.2*; 9.60.3* (both όδε); 4.92; 7.127.2; 8.135.2.

number (1) 7.83.1.

proper adjective (5) 4.81.4; 6.22.2; 7.199; 9.14, 33.5.

proper noun genitive (1) 8.119.

common noun as adjective (1) 4.19.

But note the effect of separators in

7.160.1 τον τελευτάίόν σφι τόνδε έξέφαινε λόγον