Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T07:21:34.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cicada on the omphalos: an iconological excursion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Herbert Hoffmann
Herbert Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Podere Istine, 53017 Radda in Chianti (Siena), Italy
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chartres is made of stone and glass. But it is not just stone and glass; it is a cathedral, and not only a cathedral, but a particular cathedral built at a particular time by certain members of a particular society. To understand what it means, to perceive it for what it is, you need to know rather more than the generic properties of stone and glass and rather more than what is common to all cathedrals. You need to understand also – and, in my opinion, most critically – the specific concepts of the relations among God, man and architecture that, since they have governed its creation, it consequently embodies. (Geertz 1973: 50.)

Information

Type
Special section: Classical matters
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 237 , December 1988, pp. 744 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbman, E. 1970. Ecstasy or religious trance. Uppsala: Svenska Bokførlaget.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 1982. Death, women and power, in Bloch, M. & Parry, J. (ed.), Death and the regeneration of life: 211ff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothmer, D. Von. 1962. A gold libation bowl, Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin (1962): 154–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, J. 1983. The early Greek concept of soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, L. 1985. Honey pots: three white-ground cups by the Sotades painter, Antike Kunst 28: 93–105 & plate 26.Google Scholar
Carson, A. 1986. Eros the bittersweet. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. & Kathirithamby, J.. 1986. Greek insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, J.M. 1931. Elegy and Iambus II. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G.R.F. 1988. Listening to the cicadas: a study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. 1968. Anthropologie de la Grèce antique II(1): La notion de la valeur en Grèce. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Gladigow, B. 1974. Jenseitsvorstellungen und Kulturkritik, Zeitschrift fur Religion und Geistesgeschichte 26: 290–309.Google Scholar
Head, B.V. 1911. Historia Numorum 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. 1986. From Charos to Charon: some notes on the human encounter with death in Attic red-figured vase-painting, Visible Religion 4–5: 173–94.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. 1988. Why did the Greeks need imagery? An anthropological approach to the study of Greek vase-painting, Hephaistos 9: 143–62.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. Forthcoming. Rhyta and Kantharoi in Greek ritual, Greek Vases 4. Malibu: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S.C. 1981. Death and time, in Humphreys, S.C. & King, H. (ed.), Mortality and immortality: the anthropology and archaeology of death: 261–83. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaempf-Dimitriadou, S. 1979. Die Liebe der Götter in der attischen Kunst des 5. Jahrhunderts vor Christ, Antike Kunst, Beiheft II. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Kron, U. 1976. Die zehn attischen Phylenheroen: Geschichte, Mythos, Kult und Darstellungen. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1986. The invention of Athens. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luschey, H. 1939. Die Phiale. Bleicherod: C. Nieft.Google Scholar
Luschey, H. 1983. Thrakien als Ort der Begegnung der Kelten mit der iranischen Metallkunst, in Beiträge zur Altertumskunde Kleinasiens: Festschrift für K. Bittel: 313–29. Mainz: Zabern.Google Scholar
Metzler, D. 1983. Zum Schamanismus in Griechenland, in Antidoron: Festschrift für J. Thimme: 75–82. Karlsruhe: C.F. Miiller.Google Scholar
Nock, A.D. 1944. The cult of heroes, Harvard Theological Review 37: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. 1986. Myths of early Athens, in Bremmer, J. (ed.), Interpretations of Greek mythology: 187–214. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rouget, G. 1985. Music and trance: a theory of the relation between music and possession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rumpf, A. 1949. Tettix, in Symbola Coloniensia: Festschrift für J. Kroll: 85–99. Cologne: B. Pick.Google Scholar
Shefton, B.B. 1971. Persian gold and Attic black-glaze: Achaemenid influence on Attic pottery of the 5th and 4th centuries BC, Annales Archéologiques de Syrie 21: 109–11.Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1953. Opfernde Götter. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.B. 1956. The Persian spoils in Athens, in The Aegean and the Near East: Festschrift for Hetty Goldman: 281–91. Locust Valley (NY): J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1988. Demus’s gold phiale, American Journal of Ancient History 9: 48–53.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. Forthcoming. Panagyurishte, Dalboki, Lukovit and Rogozen: questions of metrology and status-Proceedings of the British Museum Rogozen Conference, March 1987.Google Scholar