Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:32:11.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classical Antiquity: the maritime dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

A. J. Parker
A. J. Parker*
Affiliation:
Department of Classics & Archaeology, University of Bristol, 11 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TB
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Introduction

Ships and the sea were an omnipresent theme of Greek and Roman art and life. Shipwreck was a well-recognized risk, and an essential ingredient of ‘lost and found’ stories in novels and comedies. Conversely, safe arrival in harbour, the successful end of a journey, was a frequent motif, especially of Roman art. These ideas were obviously underpinned by economic facts: the need for metals, the sea-girt nature of Greece, Rome’s central position in the Mediterranean, and the constant threat of food shortage in the cities of the Mediterranean world generally, necessarily involved transport and trade by sea.

Into this scene has stepped, still less than 50 years old, a new character, namely underwater archaeology. Since 1945, over 1000 ancient and medieval shipwrecks have been reported in the Mediterranean, and the roll continues to grow at an unslackened pace. This rapid increase in archaeological resource has been due, of course, mainly to the widespread use of compressed-air diving gear for sport, so that most of the known wreck sites lie in inshore waters, and in popular diving areas. However, recent developments in offshore position-fixing and in underwater communications and robotics have made it possible to explore much deeper sites; the deepest so far to have been surveyed under archaeological direction (by A.M. McCann) is a late Roman wreck at 800 m deep between Sicily and Sardinia.

Information

Type
Special Maritime Section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990, pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arribas, A., Trias, M.G., Cerda, D. & Dehoz., J. 1987. EI Barco de El Sec (Calviä, Mallorca): Estudio de los materiales. Mallorca.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F. & Van, F. Doorninck. 1982. Yassi Ada I: A seventh-century Byzantine shipwreck. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University Press. Nautical Archaeology Series 1.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F., Pulak, C., Collon, D. & Weinstein., J. 1989. The Bronze Age shipwreck at Ulu Burun: 1986 campaign, American Journal of Archaeology 93: 1–29.Google Scholar
Benoit, F. 1961. Fouilles sous-marines: I’épave du Grand Congloué ä Marseille. Gallia Supplement 14.Google Scholar
Berti, F. 1986. Rinvenimenti di archeologia fluviale ed endolagunare nel delta ferrarese, Archeologia Subacquea 3 (Bollettino d’Arte 38-39, Supp.): 19–38.Google Scholar
Bound, M. 1985a. Early observations on the construction of the preclassical wreck at Campese Bay, Island of Giglio: clues to the vessel’s nationality, in McGrail, S. & Kentley, E. (ed.), Sewn plank boats: 49–65. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S276.Google Scholar
Bound, M. 1985b. Una nave mercantile di età arcaica all’isola del Giglio, in II commercio Etrusco arcaico: 65–70. Rome.Google Scholar
Carre, M.-B. 1983. Grx00E9;ement et x00E9;quipement des navires de commerce romains d’apres les documents archx00E9;ologiques. Thése de 3éme cycle. Universite de Provence, 1983.Google Scholar
Cassien, M. 1981. Campagne des sauvetages 1980 sur les sites sous-marins de Nora-Pula. Privately printed.Google Scholar
Cassien, M. 1984. Rapport 82-84: Nora-Pula (CA) Italic: pros-pections et fouilles sous-marines, gisement phenico-punique de Colteilazzo. Privately printed.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1971. Ships and seamanship in the ancient world. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darmoul, A. 1985. Les épaves sarrasines: contribution à 1’étude des techniques de constructions navales musulmanes et mediterranéennes, in Galley & Ladjimi Sebai: 152–65.Google Scholar
DRASM [Direction des Recherches Archeologiques Sous-Marines]. 1983. Archeologie sous-marine, Aries 83. Aries. 1985. Archeologie sous-marine sur les cotes de France: vingt ans de recherche. Nantes.Google Scholar
Esieman, C.J. & Ridgway., B.S. 1987. The Porticello shipwreck: a Mediterranean merchant vessel of 415-385 BC. College Station (TX): Texas A&M name>University Press.Google Scholar
Frost, H. 1982. Stone anchors as clues to Bronze Age trade routes, in Thracia Pontica 1: 280–9. Sofia.Google Scholar
Galili, E., Shmueli, N. & Artzy., M. 1986. Bronze Age ship’s cargo of copper and tin, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 15: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galley, M. & Sebai, L.Ladjimi (ed.). 1985. L’Homme méditerraneen et la mer. Tunis.Google Scholar
Gianfrotta, P.A. & Hesnard., A. 1987. Due relitti augustei carichi di dolia: quelli di Ladispoli e del Grand Ribaud D, in Vi a, El 1’Antiguitat: econo-mia, producció i comerç al Mediterrani occidental: 285–97. Badalona: Museu de Badalona. Monografies Badalonines 9.Google Scholar
Gianfrotta, P.A. & Pomey., P. 1981. Archeologia subacquea. Milan.Google Scholar
Gill, D. 1987. Metru.Menece: an Etruscan painted inscription on a mid-5th-century BC red-figure cup from Populonia, Antiquity 61: 82–7.Google Scholar
Greene, K. 1986. The archaeology of the Roman economy. London.Google Scholar
Hesnard, A., CARRE, M.-B., Rival, M. & Dangreaux., B. 1988. L’Epave romaine ‘Grand Ribaud D’ (Hyeres, Var). Archaeonautica 8.Google Scholar
Jézégou, M.-P. 1983. L’epave 2 de 1’anse Saint-Gervais à Fos-sur-Mer. Thése de 3éme cycle, Université de Provence, 1983.Google Scholar
Katzev, M.L. 1989. Voyage of Kyrenia II, INA Newsletter 16. 1: 4–10.Google Scholar
Lequement, R. 1985. ‘La mer et ses rapports avec l’homme mx00E9;diterranéen’: l’apport de l’archéo-logie sous-marine, in Galley & Ladjimi Sebai: 108–18.Google Scholar
Linder, E. 1989. The Ma’agan-Michael shipwreck excavation — first season, 1988, CMS News 16.Google Scholar
Liou, B. 1975. Informations archéologiques: direction des recherches archéologiques sous-marines, Gallia 33: 571–605.Google Scholar
Long, L. 1987. Les épaves du Grand Congloué: etude du journal de fouille de Fernand Benoit, Archaeonautica 7: 9–36.Google Scholar
Mcgrail, S. 1989. The shipment of traded goods and of ballast in antiquity, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 8: 353–8.Google Scholar
Prieto, Nieto, al., F.J.et 1989. Excavacions Arqueològiques a Cala Culip I. Girona: Centre d’lnves-tigacions Arqueològiques de Girona. Série Monografica 9.Google Scholar
Pallarés, F. 1987. II relitto di Diano Marina nel commercio vinicolo antico, in El Vi a 1’Antiguitat: economia, producciò i comerç al Mediterrani occidental: 298–305. Badalona: Museu de Badalona. Monografies Badalonines 9.Google Scholar
Papathanassopoulos, G.A. 1976. [L’epave hella-dique ancienne de Dokos], Arkhaiologika Anal-ekta ex Athenon 9: 17–23.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1984. Shipwrecks and ancient trade in the Mediterranean, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 3: 99–113.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1986. The evidence provided by shipwrecks for the ancient economy, Thracia Pontica 3: 30–45. Sofia.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1989. Amphores Almagro 50 de l’épave de Ran-dello, Sicile, in Anfore romane e storia economica: un decennio di ricerche: 650–3. Rome.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. 1982. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. & Williams., D.F. 1986. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Perles, C. 1979. Des navigateurs méditerraneens il y a 10 000 ans, La Recherche 10 (no. 96): 82–3.Google Scholar
Pollino, A. 1987. L’épave romaine des Roches d’Aurelle, Cahiers d’Archeologie Subaquatique 6: 24–49.Google Scholar
Pulak, C. & Haldane, C., 1988. The Late Bronze Age shipwreck: the fourth excavation campaign, INA Newsletter 15 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Santamaria, C. 1982. Nouvelles recherches sur l’épave ‘A’ du Cap Dramont: qui était 1’armateur du navire?, Annales du Sud-Est Varois 7: 7–9.Google Scholar
Steffy, J.R. 1982. The reconstruction of the 11th century Serge Liman vessel: a preliminary report, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 11: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tailliez, P. 1965. Titan, in Taylor 1965: 76–93.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. P., DU (ed.) 1965. Marine archaeology: developments during sixty years in the Mediterranean. London.Google Scholar
Tchernia, A. 1986. Le Vin de 1’ltalie romaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Tchernia, A., Pomey, P. & Hesnard., A. 1978. L’épave Romaine de la Madrague de Giens (Var).fouilles de 1’Institut d’Archeologie Méditerraneenne. Paris.Google Scholar
Throckmorton, P. (ed.) 1987. History from the sea. London.Google Scholar
Doorninck, Van, H., F. 1976. The 4th century wreck at Yassi Ada: tan interim report on the hull, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 5: 115–31.Google Scholar