An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Beck, CM.2002. The archaeology of scientific experiments at a nuclear testing ground, in Schofield, et al. (ed.): 65–79.Google Scholar
Cocroft, W.D.2000. Dangerous energy: the archaeology ofgunpowderandmilitary explosives manufacture. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Beck, CM.2001. Cold War monuments: an assessment by the Monuments Protection Programme (CD). London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Dobinson, C., Lake, J. & Schofield, A.J.1997. Monuments of war: defining England’s 20th-century defence heritage, Antiquity71: 288–99.Google Scholar
English Heritage. 2000. Twentieth-century military sites. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Johnson, W.G. & Beck, C.1998. Nevada Test Site, in Schofield, (ed.): 20.Google Scholar
Mccamley, N.J.Cold War secret nuclear hunkers: the passive defence of the Western world during the Cold War. Barnsley: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. (ed.). 1998. Monuments of war: tlie evaluation, recording and management of twentieth-century military sites. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. & Anderton, M.2000. The queer archaeology of Green Gate: interpreting contested space at Greenham Common Airhase, World Archaeology32(2): 236–51.Google Scholar
Schofield, J., Johnson, W.G. & Beck, C.M. (ed.). 2002. Matériel mi-ture: the archaeology of twentieth century conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D.1998. The hot interpretation of the Cold War, in Schofield, (ed.): 18–21.Google Scholar
Whorton, M.2002. Evaluating and managing Cold War era historic properties: the cultural significance of US Air Force defensive radar systems, in Schofield, et al. (ed.): 216–26.Google Scholar