Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:04:08.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Childeish questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Andrew Sherratt
Andrew Sherratt*
Affiliation:
Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The criteria used in the British universities' current assessment of research quality prompt the question: how would Gordon Childe have fared, if assessed that way?

Information

Type
Reports
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 267 , March 1996 , pp. 18 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bernal, M. 1987. Black Athena: the Afroasiatic roots of classical civilization 1: The fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785-1985. London: Free Assocation Books.Google Scholar
Gathkkcole, P. 1994. Childe in history (6th Gordon Ghildo Memorial Lecture, 1994), Institute of Archaeology Bulletin 31:25–52.Google Scholar
Gathercole, P., Irving, T.H. & Melleuish, G. (ed.). 1995. Childe and Australia: archaeology, politics and ideas. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Harris, D.R. (ed.). 1995. The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe. London: UGL Press.Google Scholar