Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T09:50:38.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Museums of oblivion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Yannis Hamilakis
Yannis Hamilakis*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BF, UK (Email: y.hamilakis@soton.ac.uk)
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relationship between antiquity, archaeology and national imagination in Greece, the sacralisation of the Classical past, and the recasting of the Western Hellenism into an indigenous Hellenism have been extensively studied in the last 15 years or so (see e.g. Hamilakis 2007, 2009). In fact, Greece has proved a rich source of insights for other cases of nation-state heritage politics. The new Acropolis Museum project was bound to be shaped by the poetics of nationhood right from the start, given that its prime referent is the most sacred object of the Hellenic national imagination, the Acropolis of Athens. This site is at the same time, however, an object of veneration within the Western imagination (you only have to look at the UNESCO logo), a pilgrimage destination for millions of global tourists, with all its revenue implications, and an endlessly reproduced and modified global icon (in both senses of the word).

Information

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 328 , June 2011, pp. 625 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abungu, G. 2004. The declaration: a contested issue. ICOM News 1:4.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2010. Review of the ‘History of the World in One Hundred Objects’ by N. Macgregor. The Guardian, 13 November 2010.Google Scholar
Curtis, N.G.W. 2006. Universal Museums, museum objects, and repatriation: the tangled stories of things. Museum Management and Curatorship 21:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2007. The nation and its ruins: Antiquity, archaeology, and national imagination in Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2009. Indigenous Hellenisms/indigenous modernities: classical antiquity, materiality, and modern Greek society, in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B. & Vasunia, Ph. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of Hellenic studies: 19–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, T. 2010. Review of the ‘History of the World in One Hundred Objects’, by MacGregor, N.The Observer, 7 November 2010.Google Scholar
Lending, M. 2009. Negotiating absence: Bernard Tschumi's new Acropolis Museum in Athens. Journal of Architecture 14(5): 567–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcgregor, N. 2004. The whole world in our hands. The Guardian, 24 July 2004.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 2004. The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sandis, C. 2008. Two tales of one city: cultural understanding and the Parthenon sculptures. Museum Management and Curatorship 23(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar