Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:46:45.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules of engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John Carman
John Carman*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A two-day conference, Fields of Conflict: progress and prospect in battlefield archaeology, held at the University of Glasgow, 15–16 April 2000, began by considering techniques of research and the interpretation of events and moved to consideration of site management and preservation

Information

Type
Report
Information
Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 287 , March 2001, pp. 191 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Freeman, P. & Pollard, T.. Forthcoming 2000. Fields of conflict: progress and prospect in battlefield archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A., Hall, M. & Jones, S. (ed.). 1999. Historical archaeology: back from the edge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carman, J. 1999a. Bloody meadows: the places of battle, in Tarlow, S. & West, S. (ed.), The familiar past? Archaeologies of later historical Britain: 233–45. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carman, J. 1999b. Beyond the western way of war: ancient battlefields in comparative perspective, in Carman, J. & Harding, A. (ed.), Ancient warfare: archaeological perspectives: 39–55. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Carman, J. Forthcoming Experiencing A. places of slaughter: walking the line of difference between past and present, in Fowler, C. & Thomas, J. (ed.), Hermeneutics and phenomenology in archaeological interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carman, J. Forthcoming Paradox b. in places: 20th century battlefields in long-term perspective, in Schofield, J. Johnson, W.G. & Beck, C. (ed.), Matériel culture: the archaeology of 20th century conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Department Of The Environment (DoE). 1994. Planning Policy Guideline Note 15: The Historic Environment. London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
English Heritage. 1995. Register of Historic Battlefields. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Foard, G. 1995. Naseby. The decisive campaign. Whitstable: Pryor Publications.Google Scholar
Newman, P. 1981. The Battle of Marston Moor. Strettington: Anthony Bird Publications.Google Scholar
Scott, D.D., Fox, M.A. Connor, R.A. & Harmon, D.. 1989. Archaeological perspectives on the Battle of the Little Bighorn. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar