Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T19:24:41.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aesthetic factors in geometric modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Binh Pham
Binh Pham
Affiliation:
Faculty of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434 Brisbane Qld 4001, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

CAD systems have traditionally catered for architectural and mechanical engineering designs which are somewhat constrained in scope. Problems concerning other types of design such as art design, industrial design or sculpting, where creativity and aesthetic factors play an important role, are not adequately addressed. These types of design require much more flexibility in both geometric modelling capability and user-machine interaction. This paper first gives a brief overview of recent work which deals with creative activities, and analyses important issues that need to be addressed in object representations for 3D creative activities. We then discuss a scheme to categorise and represent aesthetic factors in geometric modelling.

Information

Type
Appendix
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , July 2000, pp. 169 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[1]Barr, A. H., “Superquadrics and angle-preserving transformations”, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 1 (1981) 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Biederman, I., “Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding”, Psychological Rev. 94 (1987) 115–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3]Chen, Y. and Medioni, G., “Description of complex objects from multiple range images using an inflating balloon model”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61 (1995) 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Chua, Y. S., “Bezier brushstrokes”, Computer-Aided Design 22 (1990) 551–555.Google Scholar
[5]Cohen, L. D. and Cohen, I. C., “Finite-element methods for active contour models and balloons for 2D and 3D images”, IEEE Trans. Pan. Anal. Mach. Intell. 15 (1993) 1131–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Dickinson, S. J., Pentland, A. P. and Rosenfeld, A., “A representation for qualitative 3D object recognition integrating object-centered and viewer-centered models”, in Science of Vision (ed. Leiboviv, K. N.), (Springer-Verlag, 1990) 398–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dutta, D., Martin, R. R. and Pratt, M. J., “Cyclides in surface and solid modeling”, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 13 (1993) 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Dutta, D. and Srinivas, Y. L., “Intuitive procedure for constructing geometrically complex objects using cyclides”, Comput. Aided Des. 26 (1994) 327–335.Google Scholar
[9]Dyn, N. and Levin, D., “A butterfly subdivision scheme for surface interpolation with tension control”, ACM Trans. Graph. 9 (1980) 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Elliot, I. and Huxor, A., “Superquadric-based symbolic graphics for design”, in Computers in Art, Design and Animation (eds Landsdown, J. and Earnshaw, R. A.), (1989) 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ghosh, P. K. and Mudur, S. P., “The brush-trajectory approach to figure specification: some algebraic solutions”, ACM Trans. Graph. 3 (1984) 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hanson, A. J., “Hyperquadrics: smoothly deformable shapes with convex polyhedral bounds”, Comput. Vis. Graph. Imag. Proces. 44 (1988) 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Knuth, D. E., “Mathematical typography”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1979) 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Pang, Y. J., Yang, X. and Chi, Y., “Combining computer graphics with Chinese traditional painting”, Comput. Graph. 11 (1987) 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Pentland, A. P., “Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form”, Artificial Intell. 28 (1986) 293–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Pham, B., “From CAD to automation of creative design process”, Ann. Numer. Math. 3 (1996) 317–332.Google Scholar
[17]Pham, B., “Integration of aesthetic intents to CAD systems”, in Proceedings of the ASME 1996 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, (1996) 16–20.Google Scholar
[18]Pham, B., “A hybrid representation model for aesthetic factors in design”, Machine Graphics and Vision 6 (2) (1998) 1–12.Google Scholar
[19]Pham, B., “Expressive brush strokes”, CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53 (1991) 1–6.Google Scholar
[20]Pham, B., “Fuzzy logic application in CAD”, in Fuzzy Systems Design: Social and Engineering Applications (eds Reznik, I., Dimitrov, V. and Kacprzyk, J.), (Physica-Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
[21]Strassmann, S., “Hairy brushes”, Proc. SIGGRAPH 22 (1989) 225–232.Google Scholar
[22]Tanaka, H. T., “Accurate-based sampling and reconstruction with adaptive meshes for parallel hierarchical triangulation”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61 (1995) 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Terzopoulos, D. and Metaxas, D., “Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations: Deformable superquadrics”, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach Intell. 13 (1991) 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Wu, K. and Levine, M. D., “Parametric geons: A discrete set of shapes with parameterised attributes”, in Proc. IEEE Inter. Symposium on Optical Eng. and Photonics, in Aerospace Sensing: Visual Information Process 2239 (1994) 14–26.Google Scholar