Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:45:24.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A “constant of the motion” for the geodesic deviation equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

P. Dolan,
P. Choudhury and
J. L. Safko
P. Dolan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College of Science and Technology, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, U.K.
P. Choudhury
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of South Carolina, ColumbiaSouth Carolina 29200U.S.A.
J. L. Safko
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of South Carolina, ColumbiaSouth Carolina 29200U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this short paper, it is shown that the geodesic deviation equation admits a “constant of the motion” and so can be solved exactly. We also derive an expression for the energy E of relative motion between two freely falling test particles. We can infer that, in general, E will not be a linear superposition of kinetic and potential energies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 1980, pp. 28 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1980

References

[1]de Broglie, M. and Langevin, P., Report of 1911 Solvay conference, page 450.Google Scholar
[2]El'sin, M. I., “Qualitative problems on the linear differential equations of the second order”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk 68 (1949), 221–229.Google Scholar
[3]El'sin, M. I., “On the solution of the classical oscillation problem”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk 147 (1962), 1013–1016.Google Scholar
[4]Kruskal, M., “Asymptotic theory of Hamiltonian and other systems with all solutions nearly periodic”, J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962), 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kulsrud, R. M., “Adiabatic invariant of the harmonic oscillator”, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957), 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Leach, P. G. L., “On the generalization of the Lewis invariant for the time dependent harmonic oscillator”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 34 (1978), 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Lewis, H. R., “Class of exact invariants for classical and quantum time dependent harmonic oscillators”, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968), 1976–1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lutzky, M., “Noether's theorem and the time dependent harmonic oscillator”, Phys. Lett. 68A (1978), 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Moore, R. A., “The behaviour of solutions of a linear differential equation of second order”, Pacific J. Math. 5 (1955), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Pirani, F. A. E., “On the physical significance of the Riemann tensor”, Acta Phys. Polon. 13 (1956), 389–404.Google Scholar
[11]Synge, J. L., “The first and second variations of arc length”, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 25 (1925), 247–264.Google Scholar
[12]Synge, J. L., “On the geometry of dynamics”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 226A (1926), 31–106.Google Scholar
[13]Synge, J. L., “On the neighbourhood of a geodesic in Riemannian space”, Duke Math. J. 1 (1935), 527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Synge, J. L., Relativity, the general theory (North Holland, 1960).Google Scholar
[15]Tamor, S., “An extended adiabatic invariant”, J. Nuc. Energy C: Plasma Phys. 1 (1960), 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar